SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Saeed Mahmoudpour

Publications and source records attributed to Saeed Mahmoudpour.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

From Explicit References to Scene Manifolds: Distributional Fidelity and Realism for Radiance Field Quality Assessment

Radiance field representations such as 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enable high-quality novel view synthesis but can introduce complex, view-dependent artifacts from reconstruction, rendering, and compression. Reliable perceptual quality assessment (QA) is thus essential for evaluating rendered views and guiding the design of perceptually faithful scene representations. Existing full-reference QA metrics require an aligned reference image, while recent cross-reference metrics relax this requirement by comparing a test view with non-aligned references. However, under wide-baseline radiance field settings, selecting a reliable nearby reference can be difficult, particularly when evaluating views along arbitrary trajectories and poses. We propose SCODA, a lightweight scene-conditioned objective QA method that shifts QA from explicit image-to-image comparison to scene-manifold modeling. High-quality observations of each scene are represented as a multivariate Gaussian distribution in deep feature space, producing a semantic fidelity score that measures deviation from the scene distribution. A weakly-supervised distortion-aware patch discriminator provides a complementary realism signal, and both cues are combined through an unsupervised bounded fusion strategy. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show strong agreement with human judgments and robust generalization across GS- and NeRF-generated views and trajectories. Code is publicly available at https://gitlab.com/saeedmp/scoda.

cs.CV

Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation

Benchmarking immersive media coding solutions, especially in the standardization context, requires reliable and reproducible subjective quality assessment (QA) procedures, along with objective quality metrics that remain accurate across different distortion types. This paper presents a standardized workflow for light field QA, developed and deployed in the context of JPEG Pleno standardization activities, which integrates benchmark generation, a hybrid subjective evaluation, and objective metric analysis into a common workflow. The benchmark is designed to encompass not only traditional coding-only artifacts but also distortions that arise in processing pipelines in which light field encoding is accompanied with view synthesis and reconstruction techniques. A hybrid subjective method is proposed enabling fine-grained assessment by combining reference-anchored quality rating with targeted pairwise refinement in perceptually ambiguous regions. The reliability of subjective scores is verified using statistical consistency analyses between observers of two cohorts. Finally, a large set of objective metrics is systematically evaluated in terms of global prediction accuracy, local agreement in ambiguous quality regions, and robustness across distortion families. The results show that several metrics achieve strong agreement for coding-only stimuli, but their performance consistently drops when view synthesis distortions are included. The analysis further highlights the importance of view-pooling strategy in the design of future light field quality metrics. The work provides a reproducible and standardization-ready framework for fine-grained light field QA, while identifying key limitations of current objective metrics under emerging coding pipelines. The subjectively annotated dataset is publicly available at https://plenodb.jpeg.org/lfqa/objectivecfp.

cs.CV

No-reference Quality Assessment of Contrast-distorted Images using Contrast-enhanced Pseudo Reference

Contrast change is an important factor that affects the quality of images. During image capturing, unfavorable lighting conditions can cause contrast change and visual quality loss. While various methods have been proposed to assess the quality of images under different distortions such as blur and noise, contrast distortion has been largely overlooked as its visual impact and properties are different from other conventional types of distortions. In this paper, we propose a no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) metric for contrast-distorted images. Using a set of contrast enhancement algorithms, we aim to generate pseudo-reference images that are visually close to the actual reference image, such that the NR problem is transformed to a Full-reference (FR) assessment with higher accuracy. To this end, a large dataset of contrast-enhanced images is produced to train a classification network that can select the most suitable contrast enhancement algorithm based on image content and distortion for pseudo-reference image generation. Finally, the evaluation is performed in the FR manner to assess the quality difference between the contrast-enhanced (pseudoreference) and degraded images. Performance evaluation of the proposed method on three databases containing contrast distortions (CCID2014, TID2013, and CSIQ), indicates the promising performance of the proposed method.

cs.CV

Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Objective Quality Metrics for Digital Holography

Objective quality assessment of digital holograms has proven to be a challenging task. While prediction of perceptual quality of the recorded 3D content from the holographic wavefield is an open problem; perceptual quality assessment from content after rendering, requires a time-consuming rendering step and a multitude of possible viewports. In this research, we use 96 Fourier holograms of the recently released HoloDB database to evaluate the performance of well-known and state-of-the-art image quality metrics on digital holograms. We compare the reference holograms with their distorted versions: (i) before rendering on the real and imaginary parts of the quantized complex-wavefield, (ii) after converting Fourier to Fresnel holograms, (iii) after rendering, on the quantized amplitude of the reconstructed data, and (iv) after subsequently removing speckle noise using a Wiener filter. For every experimental track, the quality metric predictions are compared to the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) gathered on a 2D screen, light field display and a holographic display. Additionally, a statistical analysis of the results and a discussion on the performance of the metrics are presented. The tests demonstrate that while for each test track a few quality metrics present a highly correlated performance compared to the multiple sets of available MOS, none of them demonstrates a consistently high-performance across all four test-tracks.

eess.IV