Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Saeideh Sekhavat

Publications and source records attributed to Saeideh Sekhavat.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Stacked Ensemble Learning for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation in CT Angiography

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk assessment increasingly relies on patient-specific biomechanical computations, which require accurate three-dimensional aneurysm geometry from computed tomography angiography (CTA). Manual and semi-automated segmentation remain time-consuming and observer-dependent, limiting their use in large-scale clinical workflows. In this study, we developed a stacked ensemble framework for automated AAA seg-mentation from CTA images. We used 40 anonymised contrast-enhanced CTA scans from AAA patients and generated reference segmentations using the nnInteractive extension in 3D Slicer. We partitioned the dataset into 32 training cases and 8 held-out test cases. Three nnUNetv2 configurations, Default, DA5, and ResEncL, were trained as base learners, and their voxel-wise probability out-puts were combined using an L2-regularised logistic regression meta-model trained from out-of-sample cross-validation predictions. We evaluated segmentation performance using Dice Coefficient and Separation Distance, a mean boundary-to-boundary distance measure introduced in this study to quantify average surface agreement. On the held-out test set, the ensemble achieved the highest mean Dice Coefficient of 0.9752 and the lowest mean Separation Distance of 0.4598 mm, indicating improved volumetric overlap and average boundary agreement compared with the individual base learners. Overall, stacked ensemble learning provided small but meaningful improvements in AAA segmentation, particularly for boundary accuracy relevant to downstream patient-specific bio-mechanical computations.

cs.CE↗

Impact of Geometric Uncertainty on the Computation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Strain

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by permanent enlargement of the aorta, often detected incidentally during imaging for unrelated conditions. Current management relies primarily on aneurysm diameter and growth rate, which may not reliably predict patient-specific rupture risk. Computation of AAA wall stress and strain has the potential to improve individualized risk assessment, but these analyses depend on image-derived geometry, which is subject to segmentation uncertainty and lacks a definitive ground truth for the wall boundary. While the effect of geometric uncertainty on wall stress has been studied, its influence on wall strain remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the impact of geometric uncertainty on AAA wall strain computed using deformable image registration of time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA). Controlled perturbations were applied to the wall geometry along the surface normal, parameterized by the standard deviation for random variation and the mean for systematic inward or outward bias, both scaled relative to wall thickness. Results show that uncertainties in AAA wall geometry reduce the accuracy of computed strain, with inward bias (toward the blood lumen and intraluminal thrombus) consistently causing greater deviations than outward bias (toward regions external to the aortic wall). Peak strain is more sensitive but less robust, whereas the 99th percentile strain remains more stable under perturbations. We concluded that, for sufficiently accurate strain estimation, geometric uncertainty should remain within one wall thickness (typically 1.5 mm).

cs.CE↗

Towards personalised assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm structural integrity

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the progressive dilation of the aorta, which can lead to rupture if undetected or untreated. Stress-based rupture risk estimation using computational biomechanics has been widely studied; however, it requires wall strength data that cannot be measured in humans in vivo. To overcome this limitation, the goal of this study is to present a new method for biomechanical assessment of AAA via simultaneous consideration of tension and strain in AAA wall. We present a patient-specific, non-invasive method for assessing the structural integrity of the AAA wall using only time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images and blood pressure data. The proposed approach integrates wall strain (throughout the cardiac cycle) and wall tension analysis to compute a novel index, the Relative Structural Integrity Index (RSII), which quantifies local wall stiffness independently of wall thickness, wall material properties, and blood pressure measurement conditions. We applied our method to twenty patients from three different hospitals to extract visual RSII maps over the AAA wall of each individual patient and to compare the RSII values between aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal aortas in one patient. Our results primarily show similar RSII values across all patients, indicating the consistency of the method. Additionally, we observed patterns consistent with experimental findings reported in the literature: AAA walls exhibited higher stiffness than healthy aortic walls, while localized low-stiffness zones in the AAA wall were predominantly found in the most dilated regions.

cs.CE↗

4D-CTA Image and geometry dataset for kinematic analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms

This article presents a dataset used in the article "Kinematics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms", published in the Journal of Biomechanics. The dataset is publicly available for download from the Zenodo data repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15477710). The dataset includes time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) captured throughout the cardiac cycle from ten patients diagnosed with AAA, along with ten patient-specific AAA geometries extracted from these images. Typically, the 4D-CTA dataset for each patient contains ten electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 3D-CTA image frames acquired over a cardiac cycle, capturing both the systolic and diastolic phases of the AAA configuration. For method verification, the dataset also includes synthetic ground truth data generated from Patient 1's 3D-CTA AAA image in the diastolic phase. The ground truth data includes the patient-specific finite element (FE) biomechanical model and a synthetic systolic 3D-CTA image. The synthetic systolic image was generated by warping Patient 1's diastolic 3D-CTA image using the realistic displacement field obtained from the AAA biomechanical FE model. The images were acquired at Fiona Stanley Hospital in Western Australia and provided to the researchers at the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory at The University of Western Australia (ISML-UWA), where image-based AAA kinematic analysis was performed. Our dataset enabled the analysis of AAA wall displacement and strain throughout the cardiac cycle using a non-invasive, in vivo, image registration-based approach. The use of widely adopted, open-source file formats (NRRD for images and STL for geometries) facilitates broad applicability and reusability in AAA biomechanics studies that require patient-specific geometry and information about AAA kinematics during cardiac cycle.

cs.CE↗

Abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress: A 7-line code in MATLAB and a one-click software application

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the irreversible dilation of the lower aorta, usually detected incidentally during imaging for other health issues. Current clinical practice for managing AAA relies on a one-size-fits-all approach, based on the aneurysm's maximum diameter and growth rate, which can lead to underestimation or overestimation of AAA rupture risk. Patient-specific AAA wall stress, computed using biomechanical models derived from medical images without needing patient-specific material properties, has been widely investigated for developing individualized AAA rupture risk predictors. Therefore, AAA wall stress, determined reliably and quickly, has the potential to enhance patient-specific treatment plans. This paper presents a 7-line code, written in MATLAB using the Partial Differential Equation Toolbox, for AAA wall stress computations via finite element analysis. The code takes AAA wall geometry as input and outputs stress components over the AAA wall domain. Additionally, we present a one-click standalone software application for AAA wall stress computation, developed based on our 7-line code using MATLAB Compiler. After verification, we used our code to compute AAA wall stress in ten patients. Our analysis indicated that the 99th percentile of maximum principal stress across all patients ranged from 0.307 MPa to 0.466 MPa, with an average of 0.380 MPa and a standard deviation of 0.048 MPa. Moreover, for every case, the MATLAB simulation time was less than a minute on a laptop workstation.

cs.CE↗

Kinematics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

A search in Scopus within "Article title, Abstract, Keywords" unveils 2,444 documents focused on the biomechanics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA), mostly on AAA wall stress. Only 24 documents investigated AAA kinematics, an important topic that could potentially offer significant insights into the biomechanics of AAA. In this paper, we present an image-based approach for patient-specific, in vivo, and non-invasive AAA kinematic analysis using patient's time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images, with an objective to measure wall displacement and strain during the cardiac cycle. Our approach relies on regularized deformable image registration for estimating wall displacement, estimation of the local wall strain as the ratio of its normal displacement to its local radius of curvature, and local surface fitting with non-deterministic outlier detection for estimating the wall radius of curvature. We verified our approach against synthetic ground truth image data created by warping a 3D-CTA image of AAA using a realistic displacement field obtained from a finite element biomechanical model. We applied our approach to assess AAA wall displacements and strains in ten patients. Our kinematic analysis results indicated that the 99th percentile of circumferential wall strain, among all patients, ranged from 2.62% to 5.54%, with an average of 4.45% and a standard deviation of 0.87%. We also observed that AAA wall strains are significantly lower than those of a healthy aorta. Our work demonstrates that the registration-based measurement of AAA wall displacements in the direction normal to the wall is sufficiently accurate to reliably estimate strain from these displacements.

cs.CE↗