Sahil S. Patel | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Win Time In Favor of Treatment (WINFT) for Hierarchical Endpoints

Standard win statistics methods determine a win, loss, or tie for a pair of subjects based on their worst outcomes (up to the end of study) that may not fully utilize all patients' conditions or disease experience throughout the follow-up period. While the newly developed win-time statistics fully utilize all patients' longitudinal information, these statistics have been limited to time-to-event endpoints and require monotonic pattern of the events. As such, they are not applicable to any type nor number of hierarchical longitudinal endpoints. We propose the win time in favor of treatment (WINFT), a general measure for any hierarchical longitudinal endpoints, that summarizes the total time a subject in the treatment group spends in a more favorable health state than a subject in the control group. Unlike existing win time methods, the WINFT does not require the component outcomes to be monotone and does not rely on modeling assumptions for estimating state probabilities. This flexibility allows analysis of a complex and diverse set of endpoints, and includes existing win time methods as special cases. Moreover, the WINFT is estimated based on U-statistics, which provide direct framework for variance estimation and confidence interval derivation, under independent censoring and missing at random assumptions, without expensive bootstrapping. We examine the performance of the proposed WINFT estimation method through simulation studies, and illustrate the method using data from the ACTT-1 COVID-19 and HF-ACTION trials. Overall, the WINFT offers a flexible and interpretable estimand for assessing treatment in clinical trial data with complex longitudinal outcomes.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Randomized Basket Trial with an Interim Analysis (RaBIt) and Applications in Mental Health

Basket trials can efficiently evaluate a single treatment across multiple diseases with a common shared target. Prior methods for randomized basket trials required baskets to have the same sample and effect sizes. To that end, we developed a general randomized basket trial with an interim analysis (RaBIt) that allows for unequal sample sizes and effect sizes per basket. RaBIt is characterized by pruning at an interim stage and then analyzing a pooling of the remaining baskets. We derived the analytical power and type 1 error for the design. We first show that our results are consistent with the prior methods when the sample and effect sizes were the same across baskets. As we adjust the sample allocation between baskets, our threshold for the final test statistic becomes more stringent in order to maintain the same overall type 1 error. Finally, we notice that if we fix a sample size for the baskets proportional to their accrual rate, then at the cost of an almost negligible amount of power, the trial overall is expected to take substantially less time than the non-generalized version.

stat.ME↗