Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Saisandri Saini

Publications and source records attributed to Saisandri Saini.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Power law $α$-Starobinsky inflation

In this work we consider a generalization of Starobinsky inflation obtained by combining power law ($R^β$), and $α$-Starobinsky inflation ($E$-model). The Einstein frame potential for this model is that of power law Starobinsky inflation modified by a parameter $α$ in the exponential. After computing power spectra for scalar and tensor perturbations numerically, we perform MCMC analysis to put constraints on the potential parameters $α$, $β$ and $M$, and the number of e-foldings $N_{pivot}$ during inflation, using Planck-2018, BICEP/Keck (BK18), DES and BAO observations. We find $\log_{10}α= 0.37^{+0.82}_{-0.85}$, $β= 1.969^{+0.020}_{-0.023}$, $M=\left(3.54^{+2.62}_{-1.73}\right)\times 10^{-5}$ and $N_{pivot} = 47\pm{10}$. With these mean values of the potential parameters $α$ and $β$, and varying $N_{pivot}$ between $40$ to $55$, we also find that the $r-n_s$ predictions of our model lie well within the $1σ$ bounds of joint constraints from combined analysis of ACT, Planck-2018, BICEP and BAO observations. We compute the Bayesian evidences for our proposed model, power law Starobinsky inflation, $α$-Starobinsky inflation and Starobinsky inflation. Considering the Starobinsky model as the base model, we calculate the Bayes factor and find that our proposed model is mildly favored by the CMB and LSS observations.

astro-ph.CO↗

Observational constraints on $α$-Starobinsky inflation

In this work we revisit $α$-Starobinsky inflation, also know as $E$-model, in the light of current CMB and LSS observations. The inflaton potential in the Einstein frame for this model contains a parameter $α$ in the exponential, which alters the predictions for the scalar and tensor power spectra of Starobinsky inflation. We obtain these power spectra numerically without using slow-roll approximation and perform MCMC analysis to put constraints on parameters $M$ and $α$ from Planck-2018, BICEP/Keck (BK18) and other LSS observations. We consider general reheating scenario by varying the number of e-foldings during inflation, $N_{pivot}$, along with the other parameters. We find $\log_{10}α= 0.0^{+1.6}_{-5.6}$, $\log_{10}M= -4.91^{+0.69}_{-2.7}$ and $N_{pivot} = 53.2^{+3.9}_{-5}$ with $95\%$ C. L.. This implies that the present CMB and LSS observations are insufficient to constrain the parameter $α$. We also find that there is no correlation between $N_{pivot}$ and $α$.

astro-ph.CO↗

Exploring generalized Starobinsky Model of Inflation: Observational Constraints

We examine the power-law Starobinsky model, a generalized version of the Starobinsky inflation model, characterized by a power-law correction to Einstein gravity. Employing the $f(R)$ formalism, the scalar and tensor power spectra were numerically computed as functions of the dimensionless parameters $M$ and $β$. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis was conducted using Planck-2018, BICEP3 and BAO observational data, yielding precise constraints on $β= 1.987^{+0.013}_{-0.016},\, 95\%\, C.\, L.$. and $ \log_{10}M = -4.72^{+0.21}_{-0.20}$. The derived scalar spectral index $n_s=0.9676^{+0.0069}_{-0.0068}$ and tensor-to-scalar ratio $r=0.0074^{+0.0061}_{-0.0044}$ lie within the bounds set by Planck observations. We analyse a general reheating scenario while keeping the number of e-folds during inflation, $N_{pivot}$, fixed. The analysis confirms that deviations from the Starobinsky $R^2$ model are observationaly viable, with implications for high-energy physics and supergravity-based inflationary models.

astro-ph.CO↗

Observational constraints on power law Starobinsky inflation

In this work we revisit power law, $\frac{1}{M^2}R^β$, inflation to find the deviations from $R^2$ inflation allowed by current CMB and LSS observations. We compute the power spectra for scalar and tensor perturbations numerically and perform MCMC analysis to put constraints on parameters $M$ and $β$ from Planck-2018, BICEP3 and other LSS observations. We consider general reheating scenario and also vary the number of e-foldings during inflation, $N_{pivot}$, along with the other parameters. We find $β= 1.966^{+0.035}_{-0.042}$, $M= \left(3.31^{+5}_{-2}\right)\times 10^{-5}$ and $N_{pivot} = 41^{+10}_{-10}$ with $95\%\, C.\, L.$. This indicates that the current observations allow deviation from Starobinsky inflation. The scalar spectral index, $n_s$, and tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, derived from these parameters, are consistent with the Planck and BICEP3 observations.

astro-ph.CO↗