arXiv subjects

Sajad Amiri

Publications and source records attributed to Sajad Amiri.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Infrared Imaging Empowered by Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Skeletal Triage: A Narrative Review and Future Perspectives

Background. Pediatric musculoskeletal trauma represents up to 18% of pediatric ED visits, yet diagnosis still depends on ionizing radiography. Cumulative low-dose radiation in early life raises lifetime leukemia and brain malignancy risk, motivating radiation-free triage alternatives. Objective. To synthesize evidence for a hybrid framework coupling broad-spectrum infrared (IR) imaging with deep-learning cross-modal translation to generate clinically interpretable synthetic-radiograph reconstructions from non-ionizing data. Approach. We review five IR spectral windows spanning 650 nm to 1 mm - NIR-I, NIR-II, SWIR, MIR/LWIR, and THz - and how dual-geometry (transmission/reflection) acquisition exploits wavelength-specific tissue depth and biochemical sensitivity. We summarize image-to-image translation networks (Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, Swin-Unet) and feature-matching algorithms (SuperPoint, SuperGlue, ALIKED, LightGlue) used to align and fuse IR data into radiograph-equivalent reconstructions. Implications. Pediatric anatomy - smaller cross-sections, thinner cortical bone - favors IR penetration, enabling compact, portable, non-ionizing triage hardware. Feasibility is grounded in fNIRS and transcranial photobiomodulation evidence: near-infrared light passes through skin, skull, and cortex with sufficient signal for hemodynamic monitoring - a longer, more attenuating path than through a pediatric forearm or distal leg. Key barriers: paired IR/X-ray dataset construction, AI-as-medical-device regulatory pathways, generalization across body habitus and skin pigmentation, and acquisition-protocol standardization. Conclusions. Integrated multi-spectral IR+AI imaging is a promising radiation-free complement to pediatric skeletal radiography. Progress requires multi-center paired datasets, externally validated models, and IR source safety qualification under IEC 60825-1.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Enhancement Without Contrast: Stability-Aware Multicenter Machine Learning for Glioma MRI Imaging

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are central to glioma imaging but raise safety, cost, and accessibility concerns. Predicting contrast enhancement from non-contrast MRI using machine learning (ML) offers a safer alternative, as enhancement reflects tumor aggressiveness and informs treatment planning. Yet scanner and cohort variability hinder robust model selection. We propose a stability-aware framework to identify reproducible ML pipelines for multicenter prediction of glioma MRI contrast enhancement. We analyzed 1,446 glioma cases from four TCIA datasets (UCSF-PDGM, UPENN-GB, BRATS-Africa, BRATS-TCGA-LGG). Non-contrast T1WI served as input, with enhancement derived from paired post-contrast T1WI. Using PyRadiomics under IBSI standards, 108 features were extracted and combined with 48 dimensionality reduction methods and 25 classifiers, yielding 1,200 pipelines. Rotational validation was trained on three datasets and tested on the fourth. Cross-validation prediction accuracies ranged from 0.91 to 0.96, with external testing achieving 0.87 (UCSF-PDGM), 0.98 (UPENN-GB), and 0.95 (BRATS-Africa), with an average of 0.93. F1, precision, and recall were stable (0.87 to 0.96), while ROC-AUC varied more widely (0.50 to 0.82), reflecting cohort heterogeneity. The MI linked with ETr pipeline consistently ranked highest, balancing accuracy and stability. This framework demonstrates that stability-aware model selection enables reliable prediction of contrast enhancement from non-contrast glioma MRI, reducing reliance on GBCAs and improving generalizability across centers. It provides a scalable template for reproducible ML in neuro-oncology and beyond.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Machine Learning Evaluation Metric Discrepancies across Programming Languages and Their Components: Need for Standardization

This study evaluates metrics for tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, correlation analysis, statistical tests, segmentation, and image-to-image (I2I) translation. Metrics were compared across Python libraries, R packages, and Matlab functions to assess their consistency and highlight discrepancies. The findings underscore the need for a unified roadmap to standardize metrics, ensuring reliable and reproducible ML evaluations across platforms. This study examined a wide range of evaluation metrics across various tasks and found only some to be consistent across platforms, such as (i) Accuracy, Balanced Accuracy, Cohens Kappa, F-beta Score, MCC, Geometric Mean, AUC, and Log Loss in binary classification; (ii) Accuracy, Cohens Kappa, and F-beta Score in multi-class classification; (iii) MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE, Explained Variance, Median AE, MSLE, and Huber in regression; (iv) Davies-Bouldin Index and Calinski-Harabasz Index in clustering; (v) Pearson, Spearman, Kendall's Tau, Mutual Information, Distance Correlation, Percbend, Shepherd, and Partial Correlation in correlation analysis; (vi) Paired t-test, Chi-Square Test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis Test, Shapiro-Wilk Test, Welchs t-test, and Bartlett's test in statistical tests; (vii) Accuracy, Precision, and Recall in 2D segmentation; (viii) Accuracy in 3D segmentation; (ix) MAE, MSE, RMSE, and R-Squared in 2D-I2I translation; and (x) MAE, MSE, and RMSE in 3D-I2I translation. Given observation of discrepancies in a number of metrics (e.g. precision, recall and F1 score in binary classification, WCSS in clustering, multiple statistical tests, and IoU in segmentation, amongst multiple metrics), this study concludes that ML evaluation metrics require standardization and recommends that future research use consistent metrics for different tasks to effectively compare ML techniques and solutions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Biological and Radiological Dictionary of Radiomics Features: Addressing Understandable AI Issues in Personalized Prostate Cancer; Dictionary Version PM1.0

We investigate the connection between visual semantic features defined in PI-RADS and associated risk factors, moving beyond abnormal imaging findings, establishing a shared framework between medical and AI professionals by creating a standardized dictionary of biological/radiological RFs. Subsequently, 6 interpretable and seven complex classifiers, linked with nine interpretable feature selection algorithms (FSA) applied to risk factors, were extracted from segmented lesions in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) multiparametric-prostate MRI sequences to predict the UCLA scores. We then utilized the created dictionary to interpret the best-predictive models. Combining T2WI, DWI, and ADC with FSAs including ANOVA F-test, Correlation Coefficient, and Fisher Score, and utilizing logistic regression, identified key features: The 90th percentile from T2WI, which captures hypo-intensity related to prostate cancer risk; Variance from T2WI, indicating lesion heterogeneity; shape metrics including Least Axis Length and Surface Area to Volume ratio from ADC, describing lesion shape and compactness; and Run Entropy from ADC, reflecting texture consistency. This approach achieved the highest average accuracy of 0.78, significantly outperforming single-sequence methods (p-value<0.05). The developed dictionary for Prostate-MRI (PM1.0) serves as a common language, fosters collaboration between clinical professionals and AI developers to advance trustworthy AI solutions that support reliable/interpretable clinical decisions.

physics.med-ph↗