arXiv subjects

Sajjad Arzemanzadeh

Publications and source records attributed to Sajjad Arzemanzadeh.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mechanical behaviour of brain-skull interface (meninges) under shear loading through experiment and finite element modelling: Preliminary results

The brain-skull interface (meninges) plays a critical role in governing brain motion during head impacts, yet computational models often simplify this interface using idealized contact conditions due to limited experimental data. This study presents an improved protocol combining experimental testing and computational modelling to determine the mechanical properties of the brain-skull interface under shear loading. Brain tissue and brain-skull complex samples were extracted from sheep cadaver heads and subjected to shear loading. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to obtain accurate 3D geometries of the samples, which were then used to create computational grids (meshes) for simulation of the experiments using finite element (FE) models to determine subject-specific properties of the brain tissue and brain-skull interface. A second-order Ogden hyperelastic model was used for the brain tissue, and a cohesive layer was employed to model the brain-skull interface. Our results indicate that a cohesive layer captures the force-displacement and damage initiation of the brain-skull interface. The calibrated cohesive properties showed consistent patterns across samples, with maximum normal tractions ranging from 2.8-3.4 kPa and maximum tangential tractions from 1.8-2.1 kPa. This framework provides a foundation for improving the biofidelity of computational head models used in injury prediction and neurosurgical planning by replacing arbitrary boundary conditions with formulations derived from experimental data on brain-skull interface (meninges) biomechanical behaviour.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

On the validity of using idealised sample geometries for interpreting mechanical tests of very soft tissues

Mechanical characterisation of soft tissues often relies on inverse analysis of experimental data in which constitutive models are calibrated to match experimental force-displacement curves, yet the vast majority of such studies use idealised (nominal) sample geometries even though experimental samples unavoidably deviate from these nominal shapes because of imperfections in excision and mounting. The influence of these geometric simplifications on the material parameters determined through inverse analysis remains poorly quantified. We investigate the appropriateness of using idealised sample geometries in mechanical characterisation of brain tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to reconstruct the exact (real) geometry of each nominally cuboidal tissue sample. We determined a stress parameter (the shear modulus) by modelling, using the finite element method, tensile, compressive, and shear tests of brain tissue samples with both the MRI-based (real) and idealised cuboidal geometries, enabling a controlled comparison of geometry. Idealised geometries consistently yielded a lower stress parameter. The discrepancy in shear modulus between the real and idealised geometries varied across loading modes, averaging approximately 10% in shear and 48% under axial loading, predominantly arising from the compressive response. These discrepancies can be attributed to the inability of idealised-geometry models to accurately represent contact interactions and predict strain distributions, particularly under compressive loading. Idealisation of sample geometry may introduce systematic bias in the mechanical characterisation of very soft tissues; therefore, the actual measured sample geometry should be used in inverse analysis to identify constitutive models and their parameters.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

Stacked Ensemble Learning for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation in CT Angiography

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk assessment increasingly relies on patient-specific biomechanical computations, which require accurate three-dimensional aneurysm geometry from computed tomography angiography (CTA). Manual and semi-automated segmentation remain time-consuming and observer-dependent, limiting their use in large-scale clinical workflows. In this study, we developed a stacked ensemble framework for automated AAA seg-mentation from CTA images. We used 40 anonymised contrast-enhanced CTA scans from AAA patients and generated reference segmentations using the nnInteractive extension in 3D Slicer. We partitioned the dataset into 32 training cases and 8 held-out test cases. Three nnUNetv2 configurations, Default, DA5, and ResEncL, were trained as base learners, and their voxel-wise probability out-puts were combined using an L2-regularised logistic regression meta-model trained from out-of-sample cross-validation predictions. We evaluated segmentation performance using Dice Coefficient and Separation Distance, a mean boundary-to-boundary distance measure introduced in this study to quantify average surface agreement. On the held-out test set, the ensemble achieved the highest mean Dice Coefficient of 0.9752 and the lowest mean Separation Distance of 0.4598 mm, indicating improved volumetric overlap and average boundary agreement compared with the individual base learners. Overall, stacked ensemble learning provided small but meaningful improvements in AAA segmentation, particularly for boundary accuracy relevant to downstream patient-specific bio-mechanical computations.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2024

Towards Determining Mechanical Properties of Brain-Skull Interface Under Tension and Compression

Computational biomechanics models of the brain have become an important tool for investigating the brain responses to mechanical loads. The geometry, loading conditions, and constitutive properties of such brain models are well-studied and generally accepted. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence to support models of the layers of tissues (brain-skull interface) connecting the brain with the skull which determine boundary conditions for the brain. We present a new protocol for determining the biomechanical properties of the brain-skull interface and present the preliminary results (for a small number of tissue samples extracted from sheep cadaver heads). The method consists of biomechanical experiments using brain tissue and brain-skull complex (consisting of the brain tissue, brain-skull interface, and skull bone) and comprehensive computer simulation of the experiments using the finite element (FE) method. Application of the FE simulations allowed us to abandon the traditionally used approaches that rely on analytical formulations that assume cuboidal (or cylindrical) sample geometry when determining the parameters that describe the biomechanical behaviour of the brain tissue and brain-skull interface. In the simulations, we used accurate 3D geometry of the samples obtained from magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Our results indicate that the behaviour of the brain-skull interface under compressive loading appreciably differs from that under tension. Rupture of the interface was clearly visible for tensile load while no obvious indication of mechanical failure was observed under compression. These results suggest that assuming a rigid connection or frictionless sliding contact between the brain tissue and skull bone, the approaches often used in computational biomechanics models of the brain, may not accurately represent the mechanical behaviour of the brain-skull interface.

cs.CE↗