SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Sam Choi

Publications and source records attributed to Sam Choi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gradient descent-based programming of analog in-memory computing cores

The precise programming of crossbar arrays of unit-cells is crucial for obtaining high matrix-vector-multiplication (MVM) accuracy in analog in-memory computing (AIMC) cores. We propose a radically different approach based on directly minimizing the MVM error using gradient descent with synthetic random input data. Our method significantly reduces the MVM error compared with conventional unit-cell by unit-cell iterative programming. It also eliminates the need for high-resolution analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) to read the small unit-cell conductance during programming. Our method improves the experimental inference accuracy of ResNet-9 implemented on two phase-change memory (PCM)-based AIMC cores by 1.26%.

cs.AR

In-memory Realization of In-situ Few-shot Continual Learning with a Dynamically Evolving Explicit Memory

Continually learning new classes from a few training examples without forgetting previous old classes demands a flexible architecture with an inevitably growing portion of storage, in which new examples and classes can be incrementally stored and efficiently retrieved. One viable architectural solution is to tightly couple a stationary deep neural network to a dynamically evolving explicit memory (EM). As the centerpiece of this architecture, we propose an EM unit that leverages energy-efficient in-memory compute (IMC) cores during the course of continual learning operations. We demonstrate for the first time how the EM unit can physically superpose multiple training examples, expand to accommodate unseen classes, and perform similarity search during inference, using operations on an IMC core based on phase-change memory (PCM). Specifically, the physical superposition of a few encoded training examples is realized via in-situ progressive crystallization of PCM devices. The classification accuracy achieved on the IMC core remains within a range of 1.28%--2.5% compared to that of the state-of-the-art full-precision baseline software model on both the CIFAR-100 and miniImageNet datasets when continually learning 40 novel classes (from only five examples per class) on top of 60 old classes.

cs.LG