Sam Lapp | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Centering Ecological Goals in Automated Identification of Individual Animals

Recognizing individual animals over time is central to many ecological and conservation questions, including estimating abundance, survival, movement, and social structure. Recent advances in automated identification from images and even acoustic data suggest that this process could be greatly accelerated, yet their promise has not translated well into ecological practice. We argue that the main barrier is not the performance of the automated methods themselves, but a mismatch between how those methods are typically developed and evaluated, and how ecological data is actually collected, processed, reviewed, and used. Future progress, therefore, will depend less on algorithmic gains alone than on recognizing that the usefulness of automated identification is grounded in ecological context: it depends on what question is being asked, what data are available, and what kinds of mistakes matter. Only by centering these questions can we move toward automated identification of individuals that is not only accurate but also ecologically useful, transparent, and trustworthy.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2025

Foundation Models for Bioacoustics -- a Comparative Review

Automated bioacoustic analysis is essential for biodiversity monitoring and conservation, requiring advanced deep learning models that can adapt to diverse bioacoustic tasks. This article presents a comprehensive review of large-scale pretrained bioacoustic foundation models and systematically investigates their transferability across multiple bioacoustic classification tasks. We overview bioacoustic representation learning by analysing pretraining data sources and benchmarks. On this basis, we review bioacoustic foundation models, dissecting the models' training data, preprocessing, augmentations, architecture, and training paradigm. Additionally, we conduct an extensive empirical study of selected models on the BEANS and BirdSet benchmarks, evaluating generalisability under linear and attentive probing. Our experimental analysis reveals that Perch~2.0 achieves the highest BirdSet score (restricted evaluation) and the strongest linear probing result on BEANS, building on diverse multi-taxa supervised pretraining; that BirdMAE is the best model among probing-based strategies on BirdSet and second on BEANS after BEATs$_{NLM}$, the encoder of NatureLM-audio; that attentive probing is beneficial to extract the full performance of transformer-based models; and that general-purpose audio models trained with self-supervised learning on AudioSet outperform many specialised bird sound models on BEANS when evaluated with attentive probing. These findings provide valuable guidance for practitioners selecting appropriate models to adapt them to new bioacoustic classification tasks via probing.

cs.SD↗