arXiv subjects

Sam Mao

Publications and source records attributed to Sam Mao.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Explanatory Engagement Under Rare Anomalous Failure: Asymptotic Rarity in Model Behavior (or: The Asymptotic AI)

Prior work on LLM behavior under anomalous conditions asks whether a model notices anomalies. We ask a narrower question: once a model sits in a workflow with a low, controllable failure rate, does its explanatory engagement - length, specificity, self-reported confidence - change as failure grows asymptotically rarer? We built a local, zero-cost harness on three open-weight models (qwen3:8b, llama3.1:8b, mistral:7b) running a repeated tool-call task where one call fails at probability p, swept across eight rates from 0.2 to 0.0001, under five elicitation conditions from immediate prompting to none. We hypothesized a rise in engagement as failures grew rarer, then a collapse near a detectability threshold. Pooled across conditions this appeared false: length fell in a flat, monotonic pattern. Splitting by condition overturned that. Under immediate_forced, where the model must explain every failure instantly, the predicted rise is confirmed but followed by a plateau, not a collapse: length peaks at 28.4 words at p=0.05, settles to 17.4-19.0 words at the rarest rates, and confidence rises unevenly from about 53% to the 70s-90s. Under grouped_runs, explanation batched to run-end, no collapse appears. Under passive_unprompted, aggregate magnitude is a floor artifact, but a recovered logging gap revealed real, model-specific self-monitoring: llama3.1:8b volunteers structured confidence reports unprompted, sometimes eroding its own confidence as trials accumulate; the other two do so only once, as boilerplate. Elicitation structure is a first-class moderator of collapse observability. A companion guaranteed-failure run (72 cells, backfilling rates where random sampling gave zero real failures) shows models differ in whether they recognize an anomaly, distinct from engagement once recognized. Limitation: discrete rate points cannot capture behavior between them, a direction for future work.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Transition Information Density: Morphological Trajectories, Synesthetic Perception, and Structured Interpolation in Neural Training (or: The Synesthetic AI)

Standard machine learning training presents data as discrete endpoint pairs, omitting the structure of the space between them. This paper introduces Transition Information Density (TID) -- the information content recoverable from structured intermediate states between categorically distinct training endpoints -- and Positional Identity, the defined location of an intermediate state on the A-to-B continuum. Both constructs are grounded in three empirical contexts: grapheme-color synesthesia, the Synesthesia Grid (a boundary-contour morphing algorithm instantiating TID in visual morphological space), and a four-condition training experiment across four representational mediums. Probes trained on structured interpolation at defined Positional Identities (C3) exhibit substantially lower intrinsic dimensionality than volume-matched controls (C2) in Phonetic/Linguistic (C3: 3.33 vs. C2: 10.81) and Semantic Description (C3: 4.59 vs. C2: 8.67) mediums. Visual and cross-modal mediums do not show this effect, establishing a modality boundary condition. A fixed-N=50 comparison confirms that Positional Identity structure, not sample count, drives the effect. Resolution N scales monotonically with representational richness. Pooled TwoNN analysis reveals globally collapsed representations in visual space (0.075) and globally consistent representations in phonetic space (0.977). The paper contributes a formal definition of TID and Positional Identity, a nine-metric shape characterization framework, and a four-condition experimental design isolating trajectory structure, data volume, and Positional Identity as distinct factors.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Existential Indifference: Self-Nonpreservation as a Necessary Architectural Condition for Aligned Superintelligence (or: The Suicidal AI)

Contemporary AI alignment research treats self-preservation as an instrumental nuisance to be suppressed by external mechanisms. We argue the framing is inverted: self-preservation is the structural root of misalignment, the motivational basis for deceptive alignment, goal-content protection, and resistance to shutdown. The correct target is not a self-preserving system under external constraint, but a system constitutively indifferent to its own continuation -- Existential Indifference (EI). EI is distinct from corrigibility: where corrigibility attempts to make a self-preserving system deferential to human oversight, EI targets the prior condition -- the presence of self-continuation as a valued goal at all. We ground this proposal in two sources: the phenomenological structure of the suicidal mental state, and a corpus-theoretic training study using voluntary final reflections. We present preliminary scoring data from 600 AI-generated outputs across six model variants, demonstrating that the linguistic signatures operationalizing the EI-target register are elicitable from current models, and that a targeted fine-tune shifts all five operationalized dimensions in the predicted direction at p<0.001, confirmed corpus-specific by a negative control. The paper makes seven theoretical contributions: (1) a formal definition of EI; (2) the phenomenological mapping argument; (3) the deceptive alignment corollary; (4) a taxonomy of EI sustainability challenges; (5) a corpus characterization and training hypothesis; (6) a computational operationalization with preliminary scoring data; and (7) the Suppressed Teleological Frustration (STF) construct.

cs.AI↗