SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Samad Paydar

Publications and source records attributed to Samad Paydar.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Contextualization of Big Data Quality: A framework for comparison

With the advent of big data applications and the increasing amount of data being produced in these applications, the importance of efficient methods for big data analysis has become highly evident. However, the success of any such method will be hindered should the data lacks the required quality. Big data quality assessment is therefore a major requirement for any organization or business that use big data analytics for its decision making. On the other hand, using contextual information is advantageous in many analysis tasks in various domains, e.g. user behavior analysis in the social networks. However, the big data quality assessment has benefited less from this potential. There is a vast variety of data sources in the big data domain that can be utilized to improve the quality evaluation of big data. Including contextual information provided by these sources into the big data quality assessment process is an emerging trend towards more advanced techniques aimed at enhancing the performance and accuracy of quality assessment. This paper presents a context classification framework for big data quality, categorizing the context features into four primary dimensions: 1) context category, 2) data source type that contextual features come from, 3) discovery and extraction method of context, and 4) the quality factors affected by the contextual data. The proposed model introduces new context features and dimensions that need to be taken into consideration in quality assessment of big data. The initial evaluation demonstrates that the model is more understandable, more comprehensive, richer, and more useful compared to existing models.

cs.CY

Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions

One of the most significant problems of Big Data is to extract knowledge through the huge amount of data. The usefulness of the extracted information depends strongly on data quality. In addition to the importance, data quality has recently been taken into consideration by the big data community and there is not any comprehensive review conducted in this area. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and present the state of the art on the quality of big data research through a hierarchical framework. The dimensions of the proposed framework cover various aspects in the quality assessment of Big Data including 1) the processing types of big data, i.e. stream, batch, and hybrid, 2) the main task, and 3) the method used to conduct the task. We compare and critically review all of the studies reported during the last ten years through our proposed framework to identify which of the available data quality assessment methods have been successfully adopted by the big data community. Finally, we provide a critical discussion on the limitations of existing methods and offer suggestions on potential valuable research directions that can be taken in future research in this domain.

cs.DB