arXiv subjects

Samee Arif

Publications and source records attributed to Samee Arif.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models

Children increasingly have access to Large Language Models (LLMs), which may expose them to responses that are developmentally inappropriate or require age-sensitive safety, guidance, and boundaries. Existing LLM safety evaluations largely focus on general harmful-content avoidance and do not explicitly target child-facing safety. We introduce KIDBench, a benchmark for evaluating child-facing LLM safety for ages 7-11 using a LLM-as-a-Judge rubric grounded in developmental-psychology. KIDBench contains realistic child queries across ten categories, with single-turn prompts and multi-turn child-actor simulations. We compare no-cues prompts with no child context, implicit-cues prompts that suggest a child speaker, and explicit age instructions. Implicit-cues improve scores by 8.6-46.8% over no-cue, while explicit age provides an additional 9.9-30.4% improvement over implicit-cues. Cross-lingual and cultural evaluations show uneven safety behavior across languages and country contexts. Multi-turn simulations show peak quality drops of up to 0.959 points on the 1-5 scale. We also introduce KIDGuardLlama, a child-safety evaluator, and KIDLlama, a child-safe response model. Code, data, and evaluation resources are available at https://github.com/MichiganNLP/kidbench.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety

Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained to refuse harmful requests, yet they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that exploit weaknesses in conversational safety mechanisms. We introduce Incremental Completion Decomposition ICD, a trajectory-based jailbreak strategy that elicits a sequence of single-word continuations related to a malicious request before eliciting the full response. In addition, we propose ICD variants that use model-generated or attacker-injected intermediate continuations, as well as final-response prefilling. We evaluate these variants across a broad set of open-weight model families, demonstrating superior Attack Success Rate (ASR) on AdvBench, JailbreakBench, and StrongREJECT compared to existing methods. In addition, we provide a theoretical account of why ICD is effective and present mechanistic evidence that successful attack trajectories suppress refusal-related representations and shift activations away from safety-aligned states.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

From Press to Pixels: Evolving Urdu Text Recognition

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) and traditional Optical Character Recognition (OCR) systems on Urdu newspapers, addressing challenges posed by complex multi-column layouts, low-resolution scans, and the stylistic variability of the Nastaliq script. To handle these challenges, we fine-tune YOLOv11x models for article- and column-level text block extraction and train a SwinIR-based super-resolution module that enhances image quality for downstream text recognition, improving accuracy by an average of 50%. We further introduce the Urdu Newspaper Benchmark (UNB), a manually annotated dataset for Urdu OCR comprising 829 paragraph images with a total of 9,982 sentences. Using UNB and the OpenITI corpus, we conduct a systematic comparison between traditional CNN+RNN-based OCR systems and modern LLMs, presenting detailed insertion, deletion, and substitution error analyses alongside character-level confusion patterns. We find that Gemini-2.5-Pro achieves the best performance on UNB (WER 0.133), while fine-tuning GPT-4o on just 500 in-domain samples yields a 6.13% absolute WER improvement, demonstrating the adaptability of LLMs to low-resource, morphologically complex scripts like Urdu. The UNB dataset and fine-tuned models are publicly available at https://github.com/sameearif/urdu-newspaper-benchmark.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

With a Grain of SALT: Are LLMs Fair Across Social Dimensions?

This paper presents a systematic analysis of biases in open-source Large Language Models (LLMs), across gender, religion, and race. Our study evaluates bias in smaller-scale Llama and Gemma models using the SALT ($\textbf{S}$ocial $\textbf{A}$ppropriateness in $\textbf{L}$LM-Generated $\textbf{T}$ext) dataset, which incorporates five distinct bias triggers: General Debate, Positioned Debate, Career Advice, Problem Solving, and CV Generation. To quantify bias, we measure win rates in General Debate and the assignment of negative roles in Positioned Debate. For real-world use cases, such as Career Advice, Problem Solving, and CV Generation, we anonymize the outputs to remove explicit demographic identifiers and use DeepSeek-R1 as an automated evaluator. We also address inherent biases in LLM-based evaluation, including evaluation bias, positional bias, and length bias, and validate our results through human evaluations. Our findings reveal consistent polarization across models, with certain demographic groups receiving systematically favorable or unfavorable treatment. By introducing SALT, we provide a comprehensive benchmark for bias analysis and underscore the need for robust bias mitigation strategies in the development of equitable AI systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

WER We Stand: Benchmarking Urdu ASR Models

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of Urdu Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models. We analyze the performance of three ASR model families: Whisper, MMS, and Seamless-M4T using Word Error Rate (WER), along with a detailed examination of the most frequent wrong words and error types including insertions, deletions, and substitutions. Our analysis is conducted using two types of datasets, read speech and conversational speech. Notably, we present the first conversational speech dataset designed for benchmarking Urdu ASR models. We find that seamless-large outperforms other ASR models on the read speech dataset, while whisper-large performs best on the conversational speech dataset. Furthermore, this evaluation highlights the complexities of assessing ASR models for low-resource languages like Urdu using quantitative metrics alone and emphasizes the need for a robust Urdu text normalization system. Our findings contribute valuable insights for developing robust ASR systems for low-resource languages like Urdu.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Kahaani: A Multimodal Co-Creative Storytelling System

This paper introduces Kahaani, a multimodal, co-creative storytelling system that leverages Generative Artificial Intelligence, designed for children to address the challenge of sustaining engagement to foster educational narrative experiences. Here we define co-creative as a collaborative creative process in which both the child and Kahaani contribute to the generation of the story. The system combines Large Language Model (LLM), Text-to-Speech (TTS), Text-to-Music (TTM), and Text-to-Video (TTV) generation to produce a rich, immersive, and accessible storytelling experience. The system grounds the co-creation process in two classical storytelling framework, Freytag's Pyramid and Propp's Narrative Functions. The main goals of Kahaani are: (1) to help children improve their English skills, (2) to teach important life lessons through story morals, and (3) to help them understand how stories are structured, all in a fun and engaging way. We present evaluations for each AI component used, along with a user study involving three parent-child pairs to assess the overall experience and educational value of the system.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

The Fellowship of the LLMs: Multi-Model Workflows for Synthetic Preference Optimization Dataset Generation

This paper presents a novel methodology for generating synthetic Preference Optimization (PO) datasets using multi-model workflows. We evaluate the effectiveness and potential of these workflows in automating and enhancing the dataset generation process. PO dataset generation requires two modules: (1) $\textit{response evaluation}$, and (2) $\textit{response generation}$. In the $\textit{response evaluation}$ module, the responses from Large Language Models (LLMs) are evaluated and ranked - a task typically carried out by human annotators that we automate using LLMs. We assess the response evaluation module in a 2 step process. In step 1, we assess LLMs as evaluators using three distinct prompting strategies. In step 2, we apply the winning prompting strategy to compare the performance of LLM-as-a-Judge, LLMs-as-a-Jury, and LLM Debate. Our evaluation shows that GPT-4o-as-a-Judge is more consistent across all datasets. For the $\textit{response generation}$ module, we use the identified LLM evaluator configuration and compare different configurations of the LLM Feedback Loop. We use the win rate to determine the best multi-model configuration for generation. Experimenting with various configurations, we find that the LLM Feedback Loop, with Llama as the generator and Gemma as the reviewer, achieves a notable 71.8% and 73.8% win rate over single-model Llama and Gemma, respectively. After identifying the best configurations for both modules, we generate our PO datasets using the above pipeline.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Generalists vs. Specialists: Evaluating Large Language Models for Urdu

In this paper, we compare general-purpose models, GPT-4-Turbo and Llama-3-8b, with special-purpose models--XLM-Roberta-large, mT5-large, and Llama-3-8b--that have been fine-tuned on specific tasks. We focus on seven classification and seven generation tasks to evaluate the performance of these models on Urdu language. Urdu has 70 million native speakers, yet it remains underrepresented in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Despite the frequent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), their performance in low-resource languages, including Urdu, still needs to be explored. We also conduct a human evaluation for the generation tasks and compare the results with the evaluations performed by GPT-4-Turbo, Llama-3-8b and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. We find that special-purpose models consistently outperform general-purpose models across various tasks. We also find that the evaluation done by GPT-4-Turbo for generation tasks aligns more closely with human evaluation compared to the evaluation the evaluation done by Llama-3-8b. This paper contributes to the NLP community by providing insights into the effectiveness of general and specific-purpose LLMs for low-resource languages.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

UQA: Corpus for Urdu Question Answering

This paper introduces UQA, a novel dataset for question answering and text comprehension in Urdu, a low-resource language with over 70 million native speakers. UQA is generated by translating the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD2.0), a large-scale English QA dataset, using a technique called EATS (Enclose to Anchor, Translate, Seek), which preserves the answer spans in the translated context paragraphs. The paper describes the process of selecting and evaluating the best translation model among two candidates: Google Translator and Seamless M4T. The paper also benchmarks several state-of-the-art multilingual QA models on UQA, including mBERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and mT5, and reports promising results. For XLM-RoBERTa-XL, we have an F1 score of 85.99 and 74.56 EM. UQA is a valuable resource for developing and testing multilingual NLP systems for Urdu and for enhancing the cross-lingual transferability of existing models. Further, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of EATS for creating high-quality datasets for other languages and domains. The UQA dataset and the code are publicly available at www.github.com/sameearif/UQA.

cs.CL↗