Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Sanat K. Sarkar

Publications and source records attributed to Sanat K. Sarkar.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Generalizing Simes' test and Hochberg's stepup procedure

In a multiple testing problem where one is willing to tolerate a few false rejections, procedure controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) can potentially be improved in terms of its ability to detect false null hypotheses by generalizing it to control the $k$-FWER, the probability of falsely rejecting at least $k$ null hypotheses, for some fixed $k>1$. Simes' test for testing the intersection null hypothesis is generalized to control the $k$-FWER weakly, that is, under the intersection null hypothesis, and Hochberg's stepup procedure for simultaneous testing of the individual null hypotheses is generalized to control the $k$-FWER strongly, that is, under any configuration of the true and false null hypotheses. The proposed generalizations are developed utilizing joint null distributions of the $k$-dimensional subsets of the $p$-values, assumed to be identical. The generalized Simes' test is proved to control the $k$-FWER weakly under the multivariate totally positive of order two (MTP$_2$) condition [J. Multivariate Analysis 10 (1980) 467--498] of the joint null distribution of the $p$-values by generalizing the original Simes' inequality. It is more powerful to detect $k$ or more false null hypotheses than the original Simes' test when the $p$-values are independent. A stepdown procedure strongly controlling the $k$-FWER, a version of generalized Holm's procedure that is different from and more powerful than [Ann. Statist. 33 (2005) 1138--1154] with independent $p$-values, is derived before proposing the generalized Hochberg's procedure. The strong control of the $k$-FWER for the generalized Hochberg's procedure is established in situations where the generalized Simes' test is known to control its $k$-FWER weakly.

math.ST↗

False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures

Results on the false discovery rate (FDR) and the false nondiscovery rate (FNR) are developed for single-step multiple testing procedures. In addition to verifying desirable properties of FDR and FNR as measures of error rates, these results extend previously known results, providing further insights, particularly under dependence, into the notions of FDR and FNR and related measures. First, considering fixed configurations of true and false null hypotheses, inequalities are obtained to explain how an FDR- or FNR-controlling single-step procedure, such as a Bonferroni or uSidák procedure, can potentially be improved. Two families of procedures are then constructed, one that modifies the FDR-controlling and the other that modifies the FNR-controlling uSidák procedure. These are proved to control FDR or FNR under independence less conservatively than the corresponding families that modify the FDR- or FNR-controlling Bonferroni procedure. Results of numerical investigations of the performance of the modified uSidák FDR procedure over its competitors are presented. Second, considering a mixture model where different configurations of true and false null hypotheses are assumed to have certain probabilities, results are also derived that extend some of Storey's work to the dependence case.

math.ST↗