arXiv subjects

Sara Ahmadi-Abhari

Publications and source records attributed to Sara Ahmadi-Abhari.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

LearnAD: Learning Interpretable Rules for Brain Networks in Alzheimer's Disease Classification

We introduce LearnAD, a neuro-symbolic method for predicting Alzheimer's disease from brain magnetic resonance imaging data, learning fully interpretable rules. LearnAD applies statistical models, Decision Trees, Random Forests, or GNNs to identify relevant brain connections, and then employs FastLAS to learn global rules. Our best instance outperforms Decision Trees, matches Support Vector Machine accuracy, and performs only slightly below Random Forests and GNNs trained on all features, all while remaining fully interpretable. Ablation studies show that our neuro-symbolic approach improves interpretability with comparable performance to pure statistical models. LearnAD demonstrates how symbolic learning can deepen our understanding of GNN behaviour in clinical neuroscience.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Deep Unlearn: Benchmarking Machine Unlearning for Image Classification

Machine unlearning (MU) aims to remove the influence of particular data points from the learnable parameters of a trained machine learning model. This is a crucial capability in light of data privacy requirements, trustworthiness, and safety in deployed models. MU is particularly challenging for deep neural networks (DNNs), such as convolutional nets or vision transformers, as such DNNs tend to memorize a notable portion of their training dataset. Nevertheless, the community lacks a rigorous and multifaceted study that looks into the success of MU methods for DNNs. In this paper, we investigate 18 state-of-the-art MU methods across various benchmark datasets and models, with each evaluation conducted over 10 different initializations, a comprehensive evaluation involving MU over 100K models. We show that, with the proper hyperparameters, Masked Small Gradients (MSG) and Convolution Transpose (CT), consistently perform better in terms of model accuracy and run-time efficiency across different models, datasets, and initializations, assessed by population-based membership inference attacks (MIA) and per-sample unlearning likelihood ratio attacks (U-LiRA). Furthermore, our benchmark highlights the fact that comparing a MU method only with commonly used baselines, such as Gradient Ascent (GA) or Successive Random Relabeling (SRL), is inadequate, and we need better baselines like Negative Gradient Plus (NG+) with proper hyperparameter selection.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

A study on the impact of Self-Supervised Learning on automatic dysarthric speech assessment

Automating dysarthria assessments offers the opportunity to develop practical, low-cost tools that address the current limitations of manual and subjective assessments. Nonetheless, the small size of most dysarthria datasets makes it challenging to develop automated assessment. Recent research showed that speech representations from models pre-trained on large unlabelled data can enhance Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) performance for dysarthric speech. We are the first to evaluate the representations from pre-trained state-of-the-art Self-Supervised models across three downstream tasks on dysarthric speech: disease classification, word recognition and intelligibility classification, and under three noise scenarios on the UA-Speech dataset. We show that HuBERT is the most versatile feature extractor across dysarthria classification, word recognition, and intelligibility classification, achieving respectively $+24.7\%, +61\%, \text{and} +7.2\%$ accuracy compared to classical acoustic features.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Evaluating The Robustness of Self-Supervised Representations to Background/Foreground Removal

Despite impressive empirical advances of SSL in solving various tasks, the problem of understanding and characterizing SSL representations learned from input data remains relatively under-explored. We provide a comparative analysis of how the representations produced by SSL models differ when masking parts of the input. Specifically, we considered state-of-the-art SSL pretrained models, such as DINOv2, MAE, and SwaV, and analyzed changes at the representation levels across 4 Image Classification datasets. First, we generate variations of the datasets by applying foreground and background segmentation. Then, we conduct statistical analysis using Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) and Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) to evaluate the robustness of the representations learned in SSL models. Empirically, we show that not all models lead to representations that separate foreground, background, and complete images. Furthermore, we test different masking strategies by occluding the center regions of the images to address cases where foreground and background are difficult. For example, the DTD dataset that focuses on texture rather specific objects.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2022

FIB: A Method for Evaluation of Feature Impact Balance in Multi-Dimensional Data

Errors might not have the same consequences depending on the task at hand. Nevertheless, there is limited research investigating the impact of imbalance in the contribution of different features in an error vector. Therefore, we propose the Feature Impact Balance (FIB) score. It measures whether there is a balanced impact of features in the discrepancies between two vectors. We designed the FIB score to lie in [0, 1]. Scores close to 0 indicate that a small number of features contribute to most of the error, and scores close to 1 indicate that most features contribute to the error equally. We experimentally study the FIB on different datasets, using AutoEncoders and Variational AutoEncoders. We show how the feature impact balance varies during training and showcase its usability to support model selection for single output and multi-output tasks.

cs.LG↗