SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Sarah Houdaigoui

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah Houdaigoui.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

An almost quadratic bound for the minimal excluded minors for a surface

As part of the graph minor project, Robertson and Seymour showed in 1990 that the class of graphs embeddable in a given surface can be characterized by a finite set of minimal excluded minors. However, the proof is purely existential and therefore provides no explicit information about these excluded minors. In 1993, Seymour established the first general upper bound on the order of such minimal excluded minors. Recently, Houdaigoui and Kawarabayashi improved this result by deriving a quasi-polynomial upper bound. Despite this advance, the gap between this bound and the known linear lower bound $Ω(g)$ (where $g$ denotes the genus) remains substantial. In particular, they conjectured that a polynomial upper bound should hold. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture by showing that the order of the minimal excluded minors for a surface of genus $g$ is $g^{2+o(1)}$. This result significantly narrows the gap between the known lower and upper bounds, bringing the asymptotic behavior much closer to the conjectured optimum. Our approach relies on a new structural property of minimal excluded minors. Let $G$ be a minimal excluded minor for a surface of Euler genus $g$. Houdaigoui and Kawarabayashi showed that $G$ contains $O(\log g)$ pairwise disjoint cycles that are contractible and nested in some embedding of $G$. We strengthen this result by proving a separator-based variant: for any contractible subgraph $H \subseteq G$ with a separator of size $s$ (with $H$ contained entirely in one side), the subgraph $H$ contains $O(\log s)$ disjoint cycles that are contractible and nested in some embedding of $G$. This allows us to replace a genus-dependent bound with a separator-dependent one, which is the main new ingredient in deriving our polynomial bound.

math.CO

A quasi-polynomial bound for the minimal excluded minors for a surface

As part of their graph minor project, Robertson and Seymour showed in 1990 that the class of graphs that can be embedded in a given surface can be characterized by a finite set of minimal excluded minors. However, their proof, because existential, does not provide any information on these excluded minors. Seymour proved in 1993 the first and, until now, only known upper bound on the order of the minimal excluded minors for a given surface. This bound is double exponential in the Euler genus $g$ of the surface and, therefore, very far from the $Ω(g)$ lower bound on the maximal order of minimal excluded minors for a surface and most likely far from the best possible bound. More than thirty years later, this paper finally makes progress in lowering this bound to a quasi-polynomial in the Euler genus of the surface. The main catalyzer to reach a quasi-polynomial bound is a breakthrough on the characteristic size of a forbidden structure for a minimal excluded minor $G$ for a surface of Euler genus $g$: although it is not hard to show that $G$ does not contain $O(g)$ disjoint cycles that are contractible and nested in some embedding of $G$ as demonstrated by Seymour, this bound can be lowered to $O(\log g)$ which is essential to obtain the quasi-polynomial bound in this paper. As subsidiary results, we also improve the current bound on the treewidth of a minimal excluded minor $G$ for a surface by improving the first and, until now, only known bound provided by Seymour.

math.CO

The Complexity of Finding and Counting Subtournaments

We study the complexity of counting and finding small tournament patterns inside large tournaments. Given a fixed tournament $T$ of order $k$, we write ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ for the problem whose input is a tournament $G$ and the task is to compute the number of subtournaments of $G$ that are isomorphic to $T$. Previously, Yuster [Yus25] obtained that ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ is hard to compute for random tournaments $T$. We consider a new approach that uses linear combinations of subgraph-counts [CDM17] to obtain a finer analysis of the complexity of ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$. We show that for all tournaments $T$ of order $k$ the problem ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ is always at least as hard as counting $\lfloor 3k/4 \rfloor$-cliques. This immediately yields tight bounds under ETH. Further, we consider the parameterized version of ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\mathcal{T})$ where we only consider patterns $T \in \mathcal{T}$ and that is parameterized by the pattern size $|V(T)|$. We show that ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\mathcal{T})$ is ${\#}W[1]$-hard as long as $\mathcal{T}$ contains infinitely many tournaments.

cs.CC