SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Sascha Spors

Publications and source records attributed to Sascha Spors.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimizing In Vivo Oral Lesion Classification from Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Using Data-driven Approaches

Oral cancer is a significant global health burden, and early detection remains a critical clinical need. Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) offers a promising non-invasive approach for real-time tissue characterization, but classification frameworks that jointly leverage multiple impedance features for in vivo oral lesion discrimination remain underdeveloped. This paper presents a machine-learning (ML) pipeline to optimize classification of in vivo oral pathology from EIS data collected using a handheld, bedside device. Impedance measurements were acquired from 104 patients undergoing oral cancer resection or biopsy. Three classification tasks were evaluated: (1) healthy vs. cancer, (2) multi-class lesion-type discrimination (cancer, high-grade dysplasia, non-malignant), and (3) multi-class discrimination between the three lesion pathologies and healthy tissue. For each task, signal frequencies were independently ranked and reduced using PCA, and different current injection/voltage measurement (IIVV) pattern geometries were tested. Classification performance was assessed through leave-one-patient-group-out cross-validation to ensure robustness on unseen patients. Input data dimensionality was reduced by up to 99% across all tasks while improving diagnostic accuracy over baseline models trained on the full dataset. A logistic regression model achieved the highest binary classification accuracy of 80% with an AUC of 0.90, while multi-class scenarios maintained AUCs above 0.82. All top-performing models utilized the significantly reduced IIVV set as input. The proposed pipeline advances EIS-based cancer detection by providing a robust, computationally efficient, and clinically practical framework for early diagnosis of oral cancer lesions, with a methodology readily generalizable to other EIS devices and applications.

eess.SP

A multi-level analysis of data quality for formal software citation

Software is a central part of modern science, and knowledge of its use is crucial for the scientific community with respect to reproducibility and attribution of its developers. Several studies have investigated in-text mentions of software and its quality, while the quality of formal software citations has only been analyzed superficially. This study performs an in-depth evaluation of formal software citation based on a set of manually annotated software references. It examines which resources are cited for software usage, to what extend they allow proper identification of software and its specific version, how this information is made available by scientific publishers, and how well it is represented in large-scale bibliographic databases. The results show that software articles are the most cited resource for software, while direct software citations are better suited for identification of software versions. Moreover, we found current practices by both, publishers and bibliographic databases, to be unsuited to represent these direct software citations, hindering large-scale analyses such as assessing software impact. We argue that current practices for representing software citations -- the recommended way to cite software by current citation standards -- stand in the way of their adaption by the scientific community, and urge providers of bibliographic data to explicitly model scientific software.

cs.DL

Reproducible Research is more than Publishing Research Artefacts: A Systematic Analysis of Jupyter Notebooks from Research Articles

With the advent of Open Science, researchers have started to publish their research artefacts (i. e., data, software, and other products of the investigations) in order to allow others to reproduce their investigations. While this publication is beneficial for science in general, it often lacks a comprehensive documentation and completeness with respect to the artefacts. This, in turn, prevents the successful reproduction of the analyses. Typical examples are missing scripts, incomplete datasets or specification of used software. Moreover, issues about licences often create legal concerns. This is true for the use of commercial software but also for the publication of research artefacts without proper sharing licence. As a result, the sole publication of research artefacts does not automatically result in reproducible research. To empirically confirm this, we have been systematically analysing research publications that also published their investigations as Jupyter notebooks. In this paper, we present preliminary results of this analysis for five publications. The results show, that the quality of the published research artefacts must be improved in order to assure reproducibility.

cs.DL