arXiv subjects

Satoshi Usami

Publications and source records attributed to Satoshi Usami.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Matrix Decomposition Latent Growth Model Tree

Latent growth models (LGMs) have been widely used to describe individual trajectories of change, average change patterns, and individual differences in change within a group. Structural equation model tree (SEM Tree) partitions samples through recursive partitioning using external covariates and characterizes between-group differences via parameters of prespecified SEM template models. An SEM Tree with an LGM as its template model may therefore serve as a useful classification method for longitudinal data. However, current SEM Tree implementations may face important practical obstacles, including high computational cost and frequent improper solutions caused by model misspecification or data characteristics (e.g., a limited number of measurement occasions). In the present study, we developed a matrix decomposition LGM tree (MDLGM Tree), which applies the matrix decomposition factor analysis (MDFA) approach, an eigenvalue-decomposition-based method for model estimation. Previous studies on MDFA and its extensions to SEM have shown that this approach can reduce the risk of improper solutions while yielding estimates highly similar to those obtained by maximum likelihood estimation. Through a series of simulations, we demonstrated that, compared with conventional SEM Tree, the MDLGM Tree greatly reduces the occurrence of improper solutions and is also highly efficient in terms of computation time.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Statistical Models for the Inference of Within-person Relations: A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model and Its Interpretation

The cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) has been widely used, particularly in psychology, to infer longitudinal relations among variables. At the same time, controlling for between-person heterogeneity and capturing within-person relations as processes of within-person change are regarded as key components to causal inference based on longitudinal data. Since Hamaker, Kuiper, and Grasman (2015) criticized the CLPM for its limitations in inferring within-person relations, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), which incorporates stable trait factors representing stable individual differences, has rapidly spread, especially in psychology. At the same time, although many statistical models are available for inferring within-person relations, the distinctions among them have not been clearly delineated, and discussions over the interpretation and selection of statistical models remain active. In this paper, I position the RI-CLPM as one useful method for inferring within-person relations, explain its practical issues, and organize its mathematical and conceptual relationships with other statistical models, as well as potential problems that may arise in their application. In particular, I point out that a distinctive feature of the stable trait factors in the RI-CLPM, in representing between-person heterogeneity, is the assumption that they are uncorrelated with within-person variability, and that this point serves as an important link to the mathematical relationship with the dynamic panel model, another promising alternative.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Matrix Decomposition-Based Approach to Estimate the STARTS Model

We propose a new estimation method for the Stable Trait, Auto Regressive Trait, and State (STARTS) model, which is well known for its frequent occurrence of improper solutions. The proposed approach is implemented through a two-stage estimation procedure that combines matrix decomposition factor analysis (MDFA) based on eigenvalue decomposition with conventional SEM estimation principles. By reformulating the STARTS model within a factor-analytic framework, this study presents a novel way of applying MDFA in the context of structural equation modeling (SEM). Through a simulation study and an empirical application to ToKyo Teen Cohort data, the proposed method was shown to entail a substantially lower risk of improper solutions than commonly used maximum likelihood, conditional ML, and (unweighted) least squares estimators, while tending to yield solutions similar to those obtained by ML. Compared with Bayesian estimation, the proposed method does not require the specification of appropriate (weakly informative) prior distributions and may effectively mitigate bias issues that arise when the number of time points is small. Applying the proposed method, as well as conducting sensitivity analyses informed by it, will enable researchers to more effectively delineate the range of plausible conclusions from data in estimating the STARTS model and other SEMs.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Within-Person Variability Score-Based Causal Inference: A Two-Step Estimation for Joint Effects of Time-Varying Treatments

Behavioral science researchers have shown strong interest in disaggregating within-person relations from between-person differences (stable traits) using longitudinal data. In this paper, we propose a method of within-person variability score-based causal inference for estimating joint effects of time-varying continuous treatments by effectively controlling for stable traits. After explaining the assumed data-generating process and providing formal definitions of stable trait factors, within-person variability scores, and joint effects of time-varying treatments at the within-person level, we introduce the proposed method, which consists of a two-step analysis. Within-person variability scores for each person, which are disaggregated from stable traits of that person, are first calculated using weights based on a best linear correlation preserving predictor through structural equation modeling (SEM). Causal parameters are then estimated via a potential outcome approach, either marginal structural models (MSMs) or structural nested mean models (SNMMs), using calculated within-person variability scores. Unlike the approach that relies entirely on SEM, the present method does not assume linearity for observed time-varying confounders at the within-person level. We emphasize the use of SNMMs with G-estimation because of its property of being doubly robust to model misspecifications in how observed time-varying confounders are functionally related with treatments/predictors and outcomes at the within-person level. Through simulation, we show that the proposed method can recover causal parameters well and that causal estimates might be severely biased if one does not properly account for stable traits. An empirical application using data regarding sleep habits and mental health status from the Tokyo Teen Cohort study is also provided.

stat.ME↗