Sebastien Andre-Sloan

arXiv2026

Generalization Bounds for Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations

This work establishes rigorous first-of-its-kind upper bounds on the generalization error for the method of approximating solutions to the (d+1)-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations by training depth-2 neural networks trained via the unsupervised Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework. This is achieved by bounding the Rademacher complexity of the PINN risk. For appropriately weight bounded net classes our derived generalization bounds do not explicitly depend on the network width and our framework characterizes the generalization gap in terms of the fluid's kinematic viscosity and loss regularization parameters. In particular, the resulting sample complexity bounds are dimension-independent. Our generalization bounds suggest using novel activation functions for solving fluid dynamics. We provide empirical validation of the suggested activation functions and the corresponding bounds on a PINN setup solving the Taylor-Green vortex benchmark.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNs

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are increasingly used to approximate solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), particularly in high dimensions. In real-world settings, data are often noisy, making it crucial to understand when a predictor can still achieve low empirical risk. Yet, little is known about the conditions under which a PINN can do so effectively. We analyse PINNs applied to the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) PDE and establish a lower bound on the network size required for the supervised PINN empirical risk to fall below the variance of noisy supervision labels. Specifically, if a predictor achieves empirical risk $O(\eta)$ below $\sigma^2$ (the variance of the supervision data), then necessarily $d_N\log d_N\gtrsim N_s \eta^2$, where $N_s$ is the number of samples and $d_N$ the number of trainable parameters. A similar constraint holds in the fully unsupervised PINN setting when boundary labels are noisy. Thus, simply increasing the number of noisy supervision labels does not offer a ``free lunch'' in reducing empirical risk. We also give empirical studies on the HJB PDE, the Poisson PDE and the the Navier-Stokes PDE set to produce the Taylor-Green solutions. In these experiments we demonstrate that PINNs indeed need to be beyond a threshold model size for them to train to errors below $\sigma^2$. These results provide a quantitative foundation for understanding parameter requirements when training PINNs in the presence of noisy data.

cs.LG↗