Refining asymptotic complexity bounds for nonconvex optimization methods, including why steepest descent is $o(ε^{-2})$ rather than $\mathcal{O}(ε^{-2})$
We revisit the standard ``telescoping sum'' argument ubiquitous in the final steps of analyzing evaluation complexity of algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization, and obtain a refined formulation of the resulting bound as a function of the requested accuracy $ε$. While bounds obtained using the standard argument typically are of the form $\mathcal{O}(ε^{-α})$ for some positive $α$, the refined results are of the form $o(ε^{-α})$. We then explore to which known algorithms our refined bounds are applicable and finally describe an example showing how close the standard and refined bounds can be.