arXiv subjects

Shadikur Rahman

Publications and source records attributed to Shadikur Rahman.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

VisEditBench: Can Vision-Language Models Edit Visualization Code from Multimodal Feedback?

Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown strong capabilities in generating visualization code from textual or visual specifications. However, real-world visualization authoring is inherently iterative: users frequently revise existing visualizations to repair flawed charts or adapt them to desired styles. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate generation from scratch, leaving visualization code editing from multimodal feedback largely unexplored. We introduce VisEditBench, a benchmark of 1,395 human-annotated visualization code-editing tasks grounded in realistic visualization workflows and failure cases. VisEditBench covers two practical settings: feedback-guided repair, where models revise visualization code using buggy or marked charts together with textual feedback, and reference-guided restyling, where models modify code to match a target chart image. Evaluating 20 state-of-the-art VLMs reveals that visualization code editing remains challenging: Claude-4.6-Sonnet achieves the best overall pass rate of 74.46%, while most open-source models remain below 50%. Performance is particularly weak on visually grounded style adaptation, where Claude-4.6-Sonnet achieves only 55.71%. To establish a strong baseline, we further propose VisEditAgent, a render-grounded editing framework that iteratively generates, executes, validates, and refines candidate edits. Built on GPT-4o, VisEditAgent improves overall pass rate from 55.75% to 67.99%, demonstrating the importance of render-grounded feedback for faithful visualization editing. We will release VisEditBench at https://github.com/vis-nlp/VisEditBench.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Pseudo2CodeQA: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Structured Algorithmic Reasoning in Code Generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in natural language-to-code generation; however, their ability to follow structured algorithmic reasoning remains insufficiently understood. We introduce Pseudo2Code, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the impact of structured pseudocode on code generation quality and algorithmic faithfulness. The benchmark consists of 300 manually validated real-world programming tasks spanning multiple domains and three difficulty levels (Easy, Medium, and Hard). Each task contains a problem description, structured pseudocode, reference implementation, and executable test suite. To ensure benchmark reliability, we adopt a dual-stage human validation protocol and release fully executable benchmark instances. Beyond the benchmark, we propose the Pseudo2Code Agentic Framework, a multi-stage pipeline that leverages pseudocode as an explicit intermediate reasoning representation for code generation. We evaluate both commercial and open-source language models using a rubric-based evaluation framework that measures correctness, completeness, relevance, clarity, reasoning quality, and pseudocode adherence, complemented by execution-based testing. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed Pseudo2Code Agentic Pipeline consistently outperforms strong commercial and open-source baselines, achieving an overall score of 4.78 compared to 4.31 for the strongest baseline model. Furthermore, a human evaluation study involving 100 benchmark tasks shows strong agreement between human judgments and automated assessments. Our findings provide empirical evidence that structured pseudocode improves functional correctness, reasoning quality, and algorithmic faithfulness in code generation. We release Pseudo2Code to support future research on structured reasoning, interpretable code generation, and reliable AI-assisted software development.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

DATAREEL: Automated Data-Driven Video Story Generation with Animations

Data videos combine animated visualizations with synchronized narration to communicate quantitative information and are widely used in journalism, education, and public communication. Automatically generating them requires deciding what story to tell, designing effective visualizations, and producing executable animations synchronized with narration. Despite rapid progress in vision-language models (VLMs), it remains unclear how well they can perform this task from a high-level communicative intent, largely because no standardized benchmark exists. We introduce DATAREEL, a benchmark for automated data-driven video story generation containing 328 real-world data reels. Given a data table, a communicative intent, a target duration, and a style reference image, a model must generate executable animation code with synchronized subtitles, which we render and evaluate. Evaluating eight proprietary and open-weight VLMs reveals a substantial capability gap: open-weight models exhibit execution failure rates of up to 39.8%, whereas proprietary models achieve stronger overall performance. Yet even the best-performing models frequently generate static charts, subtitle-animation desynchronization, unstable layouts, and poor adherence to the reference style. We further introduce a strong agentic baseline that decomposes generation into planning, coding, and verification, consistently outperforming direct prompting in both human and automatic evaluations. The task remains far from solved; we release DATAREEL at https://github.com/vis-nlp/DataReel to support future work.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Automated Research Article Classification and Recommendation Using NLP and ML

In the digital era, the exponential growth of scientific publications has made it increasingly difficult for researchers to efficiently identify and access relevant work. This paper presents an automated framework for research article classification and recommendation that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and machine learning. Using a large-scale arXiv.org dataset spanning more than three decades, we evaluate multiple feature extraction approaches (TF--IDF, Count Vectorizer, Sentence-BERT, USE, Mirror-BERT) in combination with diverse machine learning classifiers (Logistic Regression, SVM, Na\"ive Bayes, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Trees, and k-Nearest Neighbour). Our experiments show that Logistic Regression with TF--IDF consistently yields the best classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 69\%. To complement classification, we incorporate a recommendation module based on the cosine similarity of vectorized articles, enabling efficient retrieval of related research papers. The proposed system directly addresses the challenge of information overload in digital libraries and demonstrates a scalable, data-driven solution to support literature discovery.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2025

Toward Green Code: Prompting Small Language Models for Energy-Efficient Code Generation

There is a growing concern about the environmental impact of large language models (LLMs) in software development, particularly due to their high energy use and carbon footprint. Small Language Models (SLMs) offer a more sustainable alternative, requiring fewer computational resources while remaining effective for fundamental programming tasks. In this study, we investigate whether prompt engineering can improve the energy efficiency of SLMs in code generation. We evaluate four open-source SLMs, StableCode-Instruct-3B, Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct, CodeLlama-7B-Instruct, and Phi-3-Mini-4K-Instruct, across 150 Python problems from LeetCode, evenly distributed into easy, medium, and hard categories. Each model is tested under four prompting strategies: role prompting, zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought (CoT). For every generated solution, we measure runtime, memory usage, and energy consumption, comparing the results with a human-written baseline. Our findings show that CoT prompting provides consistent energy savings for Qwen2.5-Coder and StableCode-3B, while CodeLlama-7B and Phi-3-Mini-4K fail to outperform the baseline under any prompting strategy. These results highlight that the benefits of prompting are model-dependent and that carefully designed prompts can guide SLMs toward greener software development.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

RefactorCoderQA: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Domain Coding Question Solutions in Cloud and Edge Deployment

To optimize the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we propose a novel cloud-edge collaborative architecture that enables a structured multi-agent prompting framework. This framework comprises three specialized components: GuideLLM, a lightweight model deployed at the edge to provide methodological guidance; SolverLLM, a more powerful model hosted in the cloud and responsible for generating code solutions; and JudgeLLM, an automated evaluator for assessing solution correctness and quality. To evaluate and demonstrate the effectiveness of this architecture in realistic settings, we introduce RefactorCoderQA, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance the performance of LLMs across multi-domain coding tasks. Motivated by the limitations of existing benchmarks, RefactorCoderQA systematically covers multiple technical domains, including Software Engineering, Data Science, Machine Learning, and Natural Language Processing, using authentic coding challenges sourced from Stack Overflow. We propose RefactorCoder-MoE, a fine-tuned mixture-of-experts (MoE) code language model based on DeepSeek-Coder-7B-Instruct, adapted to the RefactorCoderQA benchmark using QLoRA for domain-specific coding question answering. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RefactorCoder-MoE achieves strong and competitive performance, significantly outperforming all evaluated open-source and commercial baselines, with an overall accuracy of 76.84%.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

DashboardQA: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Question Answering on Interactive Dashboards

Dashboards are powerful visualization tools for data-driven decision-making, integrating multiple interactive views that allow users to explore, filter, and navigate data. Unlike static charts, dashboards support rich interactivity, which is essential for uncovering insights in real-world analytical workflows. However, existing question-answering benchmarks for data visualizations largely overlook this interactivity, focusing instead on static charts. This limitation severely constrains their ability to evaluate the capabilities of modern multimodal agents designed for GUI-based reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce DashboardQA, the first benchmark explicitly designed to assess how vision-language GUI agents comprehend and interact with real-world dashboards. The benchmark includes 112 interactive dashboards from Tableau Public and 405 question-answer pairs with interactive dashboards spanning five categories: multiple-choice, factoid, hypothetical, multi-dashboard, and conversational. By assessing a variety of leading closed- and open-source GUI agents, our analysis reveals their key limitations, particularly in grounding dashboard elements, planning interaction trajectories, and performing reasoning. Our findings indicate that interactive dashboard reasoning is a challenging task overall for all the VLMs evaluated. Even the top-performing agents struggle; for instance, the best agent based on Gemini-Pro-2.5 achieves only 38.69% accuracy, while the OpenAI CUA agent reaches just 22.69%, demonstrating the benchmark's significant difficulty. We release DashboardQA at https://github.com/vis-nlp/DashboardQA

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Measuring the effectiveness of code review comments in GitHub repositories: A machine learning approach

This paper illustrates an empirical study of the working efficiency of machine learning techniques in classifying code review text by semantic meaning. The code review comments from the source control repository in GitHub were extracted for development activity from the existing year for three open-source projects. Apart from that, programmers need to be aware of their code and point out their errors. In that case, it is a must to classify the sentiment polarity of the code review comments to avoid an error. We manually labelled 13557 code review comments generated by three open source projects in GitHub during the existing year. In order to recognize the sentiment polarity (or sentiment orientation) of code reviews, we use seven machine learning algorithms and compare those results to find the better ones. Among those Linear Support Vector Classifier(SVC) classifier technique achieves higher accuracy than others. This study will help programmers to make any solution based on code reviews by avoiding misconceptions.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Estimating the Effective Topics of Articles and journals Abstract Using LDA And K-Means Clustering Algorithm

Analyzing journals and articles abstract text or documents using topic modelling and text clustering has become a modern solution for the increasing number of text documents. Topic modelling and text clustering are both intensely involved tasks that can benefit one another. Text clustering and topic modelling algorithms are used to maintain massive amounts of text documents. In this study, we have used LDA, K-Means cluster and also lexical database WordNet for keyphrases extraction in our text documents. K-Means cluster and LDA algorithms achieve the most reliable performance for keyphrase extraction in our text documents. This study will help the researcher to make a search string based on journals and articles by avoiding misunderstandings.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2025

Multi-Armed Bandits-Based Optimization of Decision Trees

Decision trees, without appropriate constraints, can easily become overly complex and prone to overfit, capturing noise rather than generalizable patterns. To resolve this problem,pruning operation is a crucial part in optimizing decision trees, as it not only reduces the complexity of trees but also decreases the probability of generating overfit models. The conventional pruning techniques like Cost-Complexity Pruning (CCP) and Reduced Error Pruning (REP) are mostly based on greedy approaches that focus on immediate gains in performance while pruning nodes of the decision tree. However, this might result in a lower generalization in the long run, compromising the robust ability of the tree model when introduced to unseen data samples, particularly when trained with small and complex datasets. To address this challenge, we are proposing a Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB)-based pruning approach, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based technique, that will dynamically prune the tree to generate an optimal decision tree with better generalization. Our proposed approach assumes the pruning process as an exploration-exploitation problem, where we are utilizing the MAB algorithms to find optimal branch nodes to prune based on feedback from each pruning actions. Experimental evaluation on several benchmark datasets, demonstrated that our proposed approach results in better predictive performance compared to the traditional ones. This suggests the potential of utilizing MAB for a dynamic and probabilistic way of decision tree pruning, in turn optimizing the decision tree-based model.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering

Charts are ubiquitous, as people often use them to analyze data, answer questions, and discover critical insights. However, performing complex analytical tasks with charts requires significant perceptual and cognitive effort. Chart Question Answering (CQA) systems automate this process by enabling models to interpret and reason with visual representations of data. However, existing benchmarks like ChartQA lack real-world diversity and have recently shown performance saturation with modern large vision-language models (LVLMs). To address these limitations, we introduce ChartQAPro, a new benchmark that includes 1,341 charts from 157 diverse sources, spanning various chart types, including infographics and dashboards, and featuring 1,948 questions in various types, such as multiple-choice, conversational, hypothetical, and unanswerable questions, to better reflect real-world challenges. Our evaluations with 21 models show a substantial performance drop for LVLMs on ChartQAPro; e.g., Claude Sonnet 3.5 scores 90.5% on ChartQA but only 55.81% on ChartQAPro, underscoring the complexity of chart reasoning. We complement our findings with detailed error analyses and ablation studies, identifying key challenges and opportunities for advancing LVLMs in chart understanding and reasoning. We release ChartQAPro at https://github.com/vis-nlp/ChartQAPro.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Examining Ownership Models in Software Teams: A Systematic Literature Review and a Replication Study

Effective ownership of software artifacts, particularly code, is crucial for accountability, knowledge sharing, and code quality enhancement. Researchers have proposed models linking ownership of software artifacts with developer performance and code quality. Our study aims to systematically examine various ownership models and provide a structured literature overview. Conducting a systematic literature review, we identified 79 relevant papers published between 2005 and 2022. We developed a taxonomy of ownership artifacts based on type, owners, and degree of ownership, along with compiling modeling variables and analytics types used in each study. Additionally, we assessed the replication status of each study. As a result, we identified nine distinct software artifacts whose ownership has been discussed in the literature, with "Code" being the most frequently analyzed artifact. We found that only three papers (3.79%) provided code and data, whereas nine papers (11.4%) provided only data. Using our systematic literature review results, we replicated experiments on nine priority projects at \texttt{Brightsquid}. The company aimed to compare its code quality against ownership factors in other teams, so we conducted a replication study using their data. Unlike prior studies, we found no strong correlation between minor contributors and bug numbers. Surprisingly, we found no strong link between the total number of developers modifying a file and bug counts, contrasting previous findings. However, we observed a significant correlation between major contributors and bug counts, diverging from earlier research.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2023

Mining Reddit Data to Elicit Students' Requirements During COVID-19 Pandemic

Data-driven requirements engineering leverages the abundance of openly accessible and crowdsourced information on the web. By incorporating user feedback provided about a software product, such as reviews in mobile app stores, these approaches facilitate the identification of issues, bug fixes, and implementation of change requests. However, relying solely on user feedback about a software product limits the possibility of eliciting all requirements, as users may not always have a clear understanding of their exact needs from the software, despite their wealth of experience with the problem, event, or challenges they encounter and use the software to assist them. In this study, we propose a shift in requirements elicitation, focusing on gathering feedback related to the problem itself rather than relying solely on feedback about the software product. We conducted a case study on student requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic in a higher education institution. We gathered their communications from Reddit during the pandemic and employed multiple machine-learning and natural language processing techniques to identify requirement sentences. We achieved the F-score of 0.79 using Naive Bayes with TF-IDF when benchmarking multiple techniques. The results lead us to believe that mining requirements from communication about a problem are feasible. While we present the preliminary results, we envision a future where these requirements complement conventionally elicited requirements and help to close the requirements gap.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

Example Driven Code Review Explanation

Background: Code reviewing is an essential part of software development to ensure software quality. However, the abundance of review tasks and the intensity of the workload for reviewers negatively impact the quality of the reviews. The short review text is often unactionable, which needs further interaction between the reviewer and the developer. The problem becomes more critical in dynamic teams and in the case of new team members who are less familiar with their reviewers and perspectives. Aims: We are proposing the Example Driven Review Explanation (EDRE) method to facilitate the code review process by adding additional explanations through examples. EDRE recommends similar code reviews as examples to further explain a review and help a developer to understand the received reviews with less communication overhead. Method: Through an empirical study in an industrial setting and by analyzing 3,722 code reviews across three open-source projects, we compared five methods of data retrieval, text classification, and text recommendation. Results: EDRE using TF-IDF word embedding along with an SVM classifier can provide practical examples for each code review with 92% F-score and 90% Accuracy. Conclusions: The example-based explanation is an established method for assisting experts in explaining decisions. EDRE was developed based on the same philosophy and can accurately provide a set of context-specific examples to facilitate the code review process in software teams.

cs.SE↗