arXiv subjects

Shantilal G. Goradia

Publications and source records attributed to Shantilal G. Goradia.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2010

Linking inverse square law with quantum mechanical probabilities

We use entropy to link fine-structure constant and cosmological constant. We also link nuclear force and gravity. We step on the fundamentals of consciousness for this new millennium with a scientific approach. Statistical and quantum mechanical probabilistic approach to explain gravity has a potential to extend physics to other branches of science. We meet the minds of giants such as Newton, Einstein, and Gamow. Implicitly we show gravity as the cumulative effect of all other forces, dominated by the strong force.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2002

Potential Links: Gravity and Nuclear Force

The gravitational inverse square law is microscopic approximation. I suggest that it should be modified for elementary particles to use the surface-to-surface separation of the particles rather than the center-to-center separations. For small particles at macroscopic separations, the ratio between the center-to-center distance D and the surface-to-surface distance d, D/d, approaches unity. At microscopic separations, this ratio grows very large. Here I apply this ratio to several microscopic situations and derive the nuclear coupling constants. I will then present a model of a gluon/graviton transformation to justify my surface originating modification.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2001

Microscopic Implications of General Relativity

The unification of gravity to the other forces has been a major problem for most of the last century. I use a modification to Newtonian gravitation to extract the strong and weak nuclear coupling constants. Some of the possible implications of this are discussed, including the feasibility of quantum gravity theories and a probe into the nature of light.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2000

Consistent Equation of Classical Gravitation to Quantum Limit and Beyond

General Relativity makes a distinction between mass and space. Mass tells space how to curve and space tells mass how to move. Newtonian gravity equation makes a distinction between them by having its numerator as mass effect and its denominator as inverse square law space effect at macroscopic approximation. At microscopic distances it makes sense to substitute surface-to-surface distance between two nucleons for center-to-center distance between them to account for the mass space distinction, keeping in mind the smallest distance between coupled nucleons is Planck length. Any distance less than Planck makes no sense in the classical world. When we calculate the force between two nucleons of one femtometer diameter each, separated by a surface-to-surface distance of Planck length, we get the force that matches well known nuclear force i.e. 10E40 times the value of the force of gravitation ``g'' calculated by assuming the Newtonian center-to-center distance of 1 femtometer. What we get is what is described as the nuclear force in scientific literature. This leads to the question: Is the nuclear force (well recognized secondary effect of color force) high intensity gravitation?

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2000

The Nuclear Force is Gravitation. Was Einstein Right?

I combine the effects of Planck length, general relativity and Newtonian gravity in one equation, to come up with a semi-classical model of gravity in the form of deviation from Newtonian gravity. Einstein explained nuclear forces in terms of gravity (Ref. 2). This reference is explicit in expressing Einstein's attempts and describes them as misguided. My model shows Einstein was not misguided in his attempts to explain nuclear forces in terms of gravity. My model shows just the contrary. I use Planck length as what it is: minimum distance that makes any sense. I make a subatomic distinction between mass and space, a lesson learned from general relativity. General relativity is about mass telling space how to curve and space telling mass how to move. Unlike string theory, I use no imaginary dimensions. My model predicts maximum nuclear force as the limit of gravitation and clearly yields Newtonian gravity at a macroscopic scale in an unprecedented and consistent manner: Good-by to quantum gravity. I am combining Newton, Planck and Einstein and to predict a limit of gravity as Chandrashekhar did to predict his limit.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2000

Classical Equation of Gravity to Quantum Limit

The fact that mass has an effect on surrounding space is the first essential element of general relativity. This paper unifies this mass/space distinction of general relativity with Newtonian gravity at a subatomic scale and with reported experimental findings of the last century. The subatomic distinction of mass concentration mainly in nucleons surrounded by empty space as we know it now was not known when the general relativity was written. The author uses this distinction to set forth a consistent classical equation of gravity valid to the Planck length and peeps into the quantum world. It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of fundamental nuclear theory for the understanding of matter in the universe and its cosmological evaluation, and also for the inclusion of gravity in the unified family of all four forces.

math-ph↗