arXiv subjects

Shimaa Ibrahim

Publications and source records attributed to Shimaa Ibrahim.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

AraEngage: Interpretable Linguistic Correlates of Engagement in Arabic Facebook News

Engagement features developed for English are routinely applied to Arabic, but unvocalized Arabic changes what a lexical feature measures. We introduce AraEngage, a query-defined sample of 10,000 public Arabic Facebook news posts from 2,451 pages in 57 countries (2023-2024) that pairs engagement counts with interpretable linguistic features. We use it to examine which interpretable Arabic indicators are associated with follower-normalized engagement, and how far those associations can be trusted given publisher context, the definition of engagement, and lexical ambiguity. Religious expressions, message length, sentence length, and lexical density are the leading correlates in a Random Forest model ($R^2$ = 0.38 on a post-level split) interpreted with SHAP. Unlike English news, positive sentiment is associated with higher engagement in this Arabic news sample. Message length shows a length paradox: unadjusted raw engagement is highest for long posts, whereas the model's attributions for follower-normalized engagement favor short posts. A linguistic audit identifies why standard lexicon features are fragile in unvocalized Arabic: imperative lists contain homographs such as the form read as "express!" that is also the frequent preposition "via", hedge lists conflate the possibility marker qad + imperfect ("may") with the emphatic qad + perfect ("has indeed"), and religious lists mix devotional formulas with place names in political news. These are plausible sources of measurement error that may attenuate the near-zero associations of imperatives and hedges. All findings are observational associations with operationalized indicators. We release the derived linguistic features, engagement counts, refined lexicons, and analysis code; raw posts are not redistributed, in line with CrowdTangle terms.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Beyond the Keyword: A Human-Annotated Benchmark for Arabic Anxiety-Related Discourse

Keyword retrieval returns expressions of personal anxiety together with many other uses of anxiety-related language. We present a benchmark of 1,000 Arabic Twitter/X posts retrieved with the keyword qalaq ("anxiety/worry") and annotated for six discourse functions. Two native Arabic-speaking annotators labeled every post independently, reaching 51.1% raw agreement (Cohen's $κ= 0.378$). We then reviewed all 489 disagreements and all 511 agreements under the same guidelines. The review changed 120 of the agreed labels (23.5%), which shows that agreements need auditing as well as disagreements. The final labels form a consensus reference; on a random sample of 200 posts, an additional annotator agreed with it on 60.5% of posts ($κ= 0.517$). Against this reference, Fanar-C-2-27B reaches 79.8% accuracy and macro-F1 0.784 ($κ= 0.749$). Its errors concentrate in the residual category (41.1% of errors; precision 0.905, recall 0.447), whose definition is internally inconsistent in the executed prompt, so the low recall cannot be attributed to the model alone. Sociopolitical Anxiety (27.1%) outnumbers Personal Emotional Expression (22.0%); these are assignment proportions in the sample, not estimates of prevalence or retrieval precision. We release the guidelines, a residual-subtype scheme, a fixed data split, label provenance, and evaluation code.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

StanceNakba Shared Task: Actor and Topic-Aware Stance Detection in Public Discourse

We present StanceNakba 2026, a shared task on stance detection in polarized social media discourse related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, organized as part of Nakba-NLP 2026 at LREC-COLING 2026. The task introduces two subtasks: Subtask A (Actor-Level Stance Detection), which classifies English social media posts as Pro-Palestine, Pro-Israel, or Neutral; and Subtask B (Cross-Topic Stance Detection), which identifies Favor, Against, or Neither stances in Arabic posts toward two conflict-related topics, normalization with Israel and refugee presence in Jordan. The task is grounded in an annotated dataset of 2,606 social media posts. A total of 7 teams participated in Subtask A and 6 teams in Subtask B. Participating systems primarily fine-tuned Arabic and multilingual transformer-based models, including MARBERT, AraBERT, and DeBERTa-v3 variants, with several teams employing cross-validation, ensemble methods, and topic-conditioned architectures. The best-performing systems achieved a Macro F1 of 0.9620 on Subtask A and 0.8724 on Subtask B, demonstrating that transformer-based approaches are highly effective for conflict-domain stance detection while highlighting persistent challenges in cross-topic generalization and neutral class prediction.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

ClimateChat-300K: A Multi-Modal Facebook Dataset for Understanding Diverse Perspectives in Climate Communication

We present ClimateChat-300K, a large-scale dataset of 299,329 public Facebook posts about climate change collected between May 2020 and May 2024 through the CrowdTangle platform. The dataset contains 41 metadata features including post content, engagement metrics, and page attributes, covering material from more than 26,000 global pages. Each post includes rich contextual information such as language, timestamp, page category, and interaction counts, enabling comprehensive analyses of public discourse around climate communication. Using topic modeling and sentiment analysis, we identify ten main themes grouped into five domains: policy, activism, cooperation, science, and conservation. The results reveal that emotional tone, post format, and page identity strongly influence audience engagement, with visually rich and emotionally charged content receiving the highest levels of interaction. The dataset also demonstrates how online discussions evolved in response to major events such as international climate summits and the COVID-19 pandemic period. ClimateChat-300K provides an open resource for reproducible and interdisciplinary research on polarization, misinformation, and the dynamics of digital climate discourse. By releasing this dataset, we aim to support transparent, data-driven research and contribute to a deeper un-derstanding of how public engagement with climate issues develops across time, geography, and institutional contexts.

cs.CL↗