Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Shinsaku Sakaue

Publications and source records attributed to Shinsaku Sakaue.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Improved Generalization Bound and Learning of Sparsity Patterns for Data-Driven Low-Rank Approximation

Learning sketching matrices for fast and accurate low-rank approximation (LRA) has gained increasing attention. Recently, Bartlett, Indyk, and Wagner (COLT 2022) presented a generalization bound for the learning-based LRA. Specifically, for rank-$k$ approximation using an $m \times n$ learned sketching matrix with $s$ non-zeros in each column, they proved an $\tilde{\mathrm{O}}(nsm)$ bound on the \emph{fat shattering dimension} ($\tilde{\mathrm{O}}$ hides logarithmic factors). We build on their work and make two contributions. 1. We present a better $\tilde{\mathrm{O}}(nsk)$ bound ($k \le m$). En route to obtaining this result, we give a low-complexity \emph{Goldberg--Jerrum algorithm} for computing pseudo-inverse matrices, which would be of independent interest. 2. We alleviate an assumption of the previous study that sketching matrices have a fixed sparsity pattern. We prove that learning positions of non-zeros increases the fat shattering dimension only by ${\mathrm{O}}(ns\log n)$. In addition, experiments confirm the practical benefit of learning sparsity patterns.

cs.LG↗

Lazy and Fast Greedy MAP Inference for Determinantal Point Process

The maximum a posteriori (MAP) inference for determinantal point processes (DPPs) is crucial for selecting diverse items in many machine learning applications. Although DPP MAP inference is NP-hard, the greedy algorithm often finds high-quality solutions, and many researchers have studied its efficient implementation. One classical and practical method is the lazy greedy algorithm, which is applicable to general submodular function maximization, while a recent fast greedy algorithm based on the Cholesky factorization is more efficient for DPP MAP inference. This paper presents how to combine the ideas of "lazy" and "fast", which have been considered incompatible in the literature. Our lazy and fast greedy algorithm achieves almost the same time complexity as the current best one and runs faster in practice. The idea of "lazy + fast" is extendable to other greedy-type algorithms. We also give a fast version of the double greedy algorithm for unconstrained DPP MAP inference. Experiments validate the effectiveness of our acceleration ideas.

cs.DS↗

Sample Complexity of Learning Heuristic Functions for Greedy-Best-First and A* Search

Greedy best-first search (GBFS) and A* search (A*) are popular algorithms for path-finding on large graphs. Both use so-called heuristic functions, which estimate how close a vertex is to the goal. While heuristic functions have been handcrafted using domain knowledge, recent studies demonstrate that learning heuristic functions from data is effective in many applications. Motivated by this emerging approach, we study the sample complexity of learning heuristic functions for GBFS and A*. We build on a recent framework called \textit{data-driven algorithm design} and evaluate the \textit{pseudo-dimension} of a class of utility functions that measure the performance of parameterized algorithms. Assuming that a vertex set of size $n$ is fixed, we present $\mathrm{O}(n\lg n)$ and $\mathrm{O}(n^2\lg n)$ upper bounds on the pseudo-dimensions for GBFS and A*, respectively, parameterized by heuristic function values. The upper bound for A* can be improved to $\mathrm{O}(n^2\lg d)$ if every vertex has a degree of at most $d$ and to $\mathrm{O}(n \lg n)$ if edge weights are integers bounded by $\mathrm{poly}(n)$. We also give $Ω(n)$ lower bounds for GBFS and A*, which imply that our bounds for GBFS and A* under the integer-weight condition are tight up to a $\lg n$ factor. Finally, we discuss a case where the performance of A* is measured by the suboptimality and show that we can sometimes obtain a better guarantee by combining a parameter-dependent worst-case bound with a sample complexity bound.

cs.LG↗

Discrete-Convex-Analysis-Based Framework for Warm-Starting Algorithms with Predictions

Augmenting algorithms with learned predictions is a promising approach for going beyond worst-case bounds. Dinitz, Im, Lavastida, Moseley, and Vassilvitskii~(2021) have demonstrated that a warm start with learned dual solutions can improve the time complexity of the Hungarian method for weighted perfect bipartite matching. We extend and improve their framework in a principled manner via \textit{discrete convex analysis} (DCA), a discrete analog of convex analysis. We show the usefulness of our DCA-based framework by applying it to weighted perfect bipartite matching, weighted matroid intersection, and discrete energy minimization for computer vision. Our DCA-based framework yields time complexity bounds that depend on the $\ell_\infty$-distance from a predicted solution to an optimal solution, which has two advantages relative to the previous $\ell_1$-distance-dependent bounds: time complexity bounds are smaller, and learning of predictions is more sample efficient. We also discuss whether to learn primal or dual solutions from the DCA perspective.

cs.LG↗

Algorithmic Bayesian persuasion with combinatorial actions

Bayesian persuasion is a model for understanding strategic information revelation: an agent with an informational advantage, called a sender, strategically discloses information by sending signals to another agent, called a receiver. In algorithmic Bayesian persuasion, we are interested in efficiently designing the sender's signaling schemes that lead the receiver to take action in favor of the sender. This paper studies algorithmic Bayesian-persuasion settings where the receiver's feasible actions are specified by combinatorial constraints, e.g., matroids or paths in graphs. We first show that constant-factor approximation is NP-hard even in some special cases of matroids or paths. We then propose a polynomial-time algorithm for general matroids by assuming the number of states of nature to be a constant. We finally consider a relaxed notion of persuasiveness, called CCE-persuasiveness, and present a sufficient condition for polynomial-time approximability.

cs.GT↗

Differentiable Equilibrium Computation with Decision Diagrams for Stackelberg Models of Combinatorial Congestion Games

We address Stackelberg models of combinatorial congestion games (CCGs); we aim to optimize the parameters of CCGs so that the selfish behavior of non-atomic players attains desirable equilibria. This model is essential for designing such social infrastructures as traffic and communication networks. Nevertheless, computational approaches to the model have not been thoroughly studied due to two difficulties: (I) bilevel-programming structures and (II) the combinatorial nature of CCGs. We tackle them by carefully combining (I) the idea of \textit{differentiable} optimization and (II) data structures called \textit{zero-suppressed binary decision diagrams} (ZDDs), which can compactly represent sets of combinatorial strategies. Our algorithm numerically approximates the equilibria of CCGs, which we can differentiate with respect to parameters of CCGs by automatic differentiation. With the resulting derivatives, we can apply gradient-based methods to Stackelberg models of CCGs. Our method is tailored to induce Nesterov's acceleration and can fully utilize the empirical compactness of ZDDs. These technical advantages enable us to deal with CCGs with a vast number of combinatorial strategies. Experiments on real-world network design instances demonstrate the practicality of our method.

cs.GT↗

Learning Individually Fair Classifier with Path-Specific Causal-Effect Constraint

Machine learning is used to make decisions for individuals in various fields, which require us to achieve good prediction accuracy while ensuring fairness with respect to sensitive features (e.g., race and gender). This problem, however, remains difficult in complex real-world scenarios. To quantify unfairness under such situations, existing methods utilize {\it path-specific causal effects}. However, none of them can ensure fairness for each individual without making impractical functional assumptions on the data. In this paper, we propose a far more practical framework for learning an individually fair classifier. To avoid restrictive functional assumptions, we define the {\it probability of individual unfairness} (PIU) and solve an optimization problem where PIU's upper bound, which can be estimated from data, is controlled to be close to zero. We elucidate why our method can guarantee fairness for each individual. Experimental results show that our method can learn an individually fair classifier at a slight cost of accuracy.

cs.LG↗

Differentiable Greedy Submodular Maximization: Guarantees, Gradient Estimators, and Applications

Motivated by, e.g., sensitivity analysis and end-to-end learning, the demand for differentiable optimization algorithms has been significantly increasing. In this paper, we establish a theoretically guaranteed versatile framework that makes the greedy algorithm for monotone submodular function maximization differentiable. We smooth the greedy algorithm via randomization, and prove that it almost recovers original approximation guarantees in expectation for the cases of cardinality and $κ$-extensible system constrains. We also show how to efficiently compute unbiased gradient estimators of any expected output-dependent quantities. We demonstrate the usefulness of our framework by instantiating it for various applications.

cs.DS↗

Guarantees of Stochastic Greedy Algorithms for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization with Cardinality Constraint

Submodular maximization with a cardinality constraint can model various problems, and those problems are often very large in practice. For the case where objective functions are monotone, many fast approximation algorithms have been developed. The stochastic greedy algorithm (SG) is one such algorithm, which is widely used thanks to its simplicity, efficiency, and high empirical performance. However, its approximation guarantee has been proved only for monotone objective functions. When it comes to non-monotone objective functions, existing approximation algorithms are inefficient relative to the fast algorithms developed for the case of monotone objectives. In this paper, we prove that SG (with slight modification) can achieve almost $1/4$-approximation guarantees in expectation in linear time even if objective functions are non-monotone. Our result provides a constant-factor approximation algorithm with the fewest oracle queries for non-monotone submodular maximization with a cardinality constraint. Experiments validate the performance of (modified) SG.

cs.DS↗

On Maximization of Weakly Modular Functions: Guarantees of Multi-stage Algorithms, Tractability, and Hardness

Maximization of {\it non-submodular} functions appears in various scenarios, and many previous works studied it based on some measures that quantify the closeness to being submodular. On the other hand, many practical non-submodular functions are actually close to being {\it modular}, which has been utilized in few studies. In this paper, we study cardinality-constrained maximization of {\it weakly modular} functions, whose closeness to being modular is measured by {\it submodularity} and {\it supermodularity ratios}, and reveal what we can and cannot do by using the weak modularity. We first show that guarantees of multi-stage algorithms can be proved with the weak modularity, which generalize and improve some existing results, and experiments confirm their effectiveness. We then show that weakly modular maximization is {\it fixed-parameter tractable} under certain conditions; as a byproduct, we provide a new time--accuracy trade-off for $\ell_0$-constrained minimization. We finally prove that, even if objective functions are weakly modular, no polynomial-time algorithms can improve the existing approximation guarantees achieved by the greedy algorithm.

cs.DS↗

Best-first Search Algorithm for Non-convex Sparse Minimization

Non-convex sparse minimization (NSM), or $\ell_0$-constrained minimization of convex loss functions, is an important optimization problem that has many machine learning applications. NSM is generally NP-hard, and so to exactly solve NSM is almost impossible in polynomial time. As regards the case of quadratic objective functions, exact algorithms based on quadratic mixed-integer programming (MIP) have been studied, but no existing exact methods can handle more general objective functions including Huber and logistic losses; this is unfortunate since those functions are prevalent in practice. In this paper, we consider NSM with $\ell_2$-regularized convex objective functions and develop an algorithm by leveraging the efficiency of best-first search (BFS). Our BFS can compute solutions with objective errors at most $Δ\ge0$, where $Δ$ is a controllable hyper-parameter that balances the trade-off between the guarantee of objective errors and computation cost. Experiments demonstrate that our BFS is useful for solving moderate-size NSM instances with non-quadratic objectives and that BFS is also faster than the MIP-based method when applied to quadratic objectives.

cs.DS↗

Beyond Adaptive Submodularity: Approximation Guarantees of Greedy Policy with Adaptive Submodularity Ratio

We propose a new concept named adaptive submodularity ratio to study the greedy policy for sequential decision making. While the greedy policy is known to perform well for a wide variety of adaptive stochastic optimization problems in practice, its theoretical properties have been analyzed only for a limited class of problems. We narrow the gap between theory and practice by using adaptive submodularity ratio, which enables us to prove approximation guarantees of the greedy policy for a substantially wider class of problems. Examples of newly analyzed problems include important applications such as adaptive influence maximization and adaptive feature selection. Our adaptive submodularity ratio also provides bounds of adaptivity gaps. Experiments confirm that the greedy policy performs well with the applications being considered compared to standard heuristics.

cs.LG↗

Practical Adversarial Combinatorial Bandit Algorithm via Compression of Decision Sets

We consider the adversarial combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) problem, whose decision set can be exponentially large with respect to the number of given arms. To avoid dealing with such large decision sets directly, we propose an algorithm performed on a zero-suppressed binary decision diagram (ZDD), which is a compressed representation of the decision set. The proposed algorithm achieves either $O(T^{2/3})$ regret with high probability or $O(\sqrt{T})$ expected regret as the any-time guarantee, where $T$ is the number of past rounds. Typically, our algorithm works efficiently for CMAB problems defined on networks. Experimental results show that our algorithm is applicable to various large adversarial CMAB instances including adaptive routing problems on real-world networks.

cs.DS↗

On maximizing a monotone k-submodular function subject to a matroid constraint

A $k$-submodular function is an extension of a submodular function in that its input is given by $k$ disjoint subsets instead of a single subset. For unconstrained nonnegative $k$-submodular maximization, Ward and Živný proposed a constant-factor approximation algorithm, which was improved by the recent work of Iwata, Tanigawa and Yoshida presenting a $1/2$-approximation algorithm. Iwata et al. also provided a $k/(2k-1)$-approximation algorithm for monotone $k$-submodular maximization and proved that its approximation ratio is asymptotically tight. More recently, Ohsaka and Yoshida proposed constant-factor algorithms for monotone $k$-submodular maximization with several size constraints. However, while submodular maximization with various constraints has been extensively studied, no approximation algorithm has been developed for constrained $k$-submodular maximization, except for the case of size constraints. In this paper, we prove that a greedy algorithm outputs a $1/2$-approximate solution for monotone $k$-submodular maximization with a matroid constraint. The algorithm runs in $O(M|E|(\text{MO} + k\text{EO}))$ time, where $M$ is the size of a maximal optimal solution, $|E|$ is the size of the ground set, and $\text{MO}, \text{EO}$ represent the time for the membership oracle of the matroid and the evaluation oracle of the $k$-submodular function, respectively.

cs.DS↗