arXiv subjects

Shivika Narang

Publications and source records attributed to Shivika Narang.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Menu Selection: A Computational Approach to Minimizing Food Waste

We introduce a novel collective decision making problem that captures the ubiquitous issue of ordering food to cater for varied dietary preferences and requirements. Our settings involve agents with diverse dietary requirements over menu options with varied serving sizes. The goal is to select a menu where everyone has enough food they can consume and wastage of food is minimized. We introduce two different consumption models: optimistic and pessimistic. Optimistic consumption assumes a situation when a central planner can optimally allocate the food ordered among the agents to maximize the number of people who get enough to eat. Pessimistic considers the worst case guarantee on consumption when agents fill their own plates in an arbitrary order. Under either consumption model, we seek valid menus (under which all agents are sufficiently fed) of minimum size. Our work provides two sets of characterizations: (1) we characterize valid menus under either consumption model and (2) we characterize the space of instances that admit polynomial-time algorithms to find minimum sized menus. Our results also help us design Integer Linear Programs to find minimum sized menus in general settings. Furthermore, we present polynomial-time algorithms for important special cases. We then consider the worst case discrepancy between the size of minimum sized optimistic and pessimistic menus. We call this the waste of pessimism, captured by the ratio of the minimum sized pessimistic menu to that of the minimum sized optimistic menu. We show tight upper bounds on this ratio. Our results also provide additional insights on the problem of finding a minimum sized maximal matching, which may be of independent interest.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Maximum Welfare Allocations under Quantile Valuations

We propose a new model for aggregating preferences over a set of indivisible items based on a quantile value. In this model, each agent is endowed with a specific quantile, and the value of a given bundle is defined by the corresponding quantile of the individual values of the items within it. Our model captures the diverse ways in which agents may perceive a bundle, even when they agree on the values of individual items. It enables richer behavioral modeling that cannot be easily captured by additive valuation functions. We study the problem of maximizing utilitarian and egalitarian welfare within the quantile-based valuation setting. For each of the welfare functions, we analyze the complexity of the objectives. Interestingly, our results show that the complexity of both objectives varies significantly depending on whether the allocation is required to be balanced. We provide near-optimal approximation algorithms for utilitarian welfare, and for egalitarian welfare, we present exact algorithms whenever possible.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Capacity Modification in the Stable Matching Problem

We study the problem of capacity modification in the many-to-one stable matching of workers and firms. Our goal is to systematically study how the set of stable matchings changes when some seats are added to or removed from the firms. We make three main contributions: First, we examine whether firms and workers can improve or worsen upon changing the capacities under worker-proposing and firm-proposing deferred acceptance algorithms. Second, we study the computational problem of adding or removing seats to either match a fixed worker-firm pair in some stable matching or make a fixed matching stable with respect to the modified problem. We develop polynomial-time algorithms for these problems when only the overall change in the firms' capacities is restricted, and show NP-hardness when there are additional constraints for individual firms. Lastly, we compare capacity modification with the classical model of preference manipulation by firms and identify scenarios under which one mode of manipulation outperforms the other. We find that a threshold on a given firm's capacity, which we call its peak, crucially determines the effectiveness of different manipulation actions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Fair Distribution of Delivery Orders

We initiate the study of fair distribution of delivery tasks among a set of agents wherein delivery jobs are placed along the vertices of a graph. Our goal is to fairly distribute delivery costs (modeled as a submodular function) among a fixed set of agents while satisfying some desirable notions of economic efficiency. We adopt well-established fairness concepts -- such as envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) and minimax share (MMS) -- to our setting and show that fairness is often incompatible with the efficiency notion of social optimality. We then characterize instances that admit fair and socially optimal solutions by exploiting graph structures. We further show that achieving fairness along with Pareto optimality is computationally intractable. We complement this by designing an XP algorithm (parameterized by the number of agents) for finding MMS and Pareto optimal solutions on every tree instance, and show that the same algorithm can be modified to find efficient solutions along with EF1, when such solutions exist. The latter crucially relies on an intriguing result that in our setting EF1 and Pareto optimality jointly imply MMS. We conclude by theoretically and experimentally analyzing the price of fairness.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Distance Preservation Games

We introduce and analyze distance preservation games (DPGs). In DPGs, agents express ideal distances to other agents and need to choose locations in the unit interval while preserving their ideal distances as closely as possible. We analyze the existence and computation of location profiles that are jump stable (i.e., no agent can benefit by moving to another location) or welfare optimal for DPGs, respectively. Specifically, we prove that there are DPGs without jump stable location profiles and identify important cases where such outcomes always exist and can be computed efficiently. Similarly, we show that finding welfare optimal location profiles is NP-complete and present approximation algorithms for finding solutions with social welfare close to optimal. Finally, we prove that DPGs have a price of anarchy of at most $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Strategyproof Matching of Roommates and Rooms

We initiate the study of matching roommates and rooms wherein the preferences of agents over other agents and rooms are complementary and represented by Leontief utilities. In this setting, 2n agents must be paired up and assigned to n rooms. Each agent has cardinal valuations over the rooms as well as compatibility values over all other agents. Under Leontief preferences, an agents utility for a matching is the minimum of the two values. We focus on the tradeoff between maximizing utilitarian social welfare and strategyproofness. Our main result shows that, in a stark contrast to the additive case, under binary Leontief utilities, there exist strategyproof mechanisms that maximize the social welfare. We further devise a strategyproof mechanism that implements such a welfare maximizing algorithm and is parameterized by the number of agents. Along the way, we highlight several possibility and impossibility results, and give upper bounds and lower bounds for welfare with or without strategyproofness.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Sublinear Approximation Algorithm for Nash Social Welfare with XOS Valuations

We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents with the objective of maximizing Nash social welfare (NSW). This welfare function is defined as the geometric mean of the agents' valuations and, hence, it strikes a balance between the extremes of social welfare (arithmetic mean) and egalitarian welfare (max-min value). Nash social welfare has been extensively studied in recent years for various valuation classes. In particular, a notable negative result is known when the agents' valuations are complement-free and are specified via value queries: for XOS valuations, one necessarily requires exponentially many value queries to find any sublinear (in $n$) approximation for NSW. Indeed, this lower bound implies that stronger query models are needed for finding better approximations. Towards this, we utilize demand oracles and XOS oracles; both of these query models are standard and have been used in prior work on social welfare maximization with XOS valuations. We develop the first sublinear approximation algorithm for maximizing Nash social welfare under XOS valuations, specified via demand and XOS oracles. Hence, this work breaks the $O(n)$-approximation barrier for NSW maximization under XOS valuations. We obtain this result by developing a novel connection between NSW and social welfare under a capped version of the agents' valuations. In addition to this insight, which might be of independent interest, this work relies on an intricate combination of multiple technical ideas, including the use of repeated matchings and the discrete moving knife method. In addition, we partially complement the algorithmic result by showing that, under XOS valuations, an exponential number of demand and XOS queries are necessarily required to approximate NSW within a factor of $\left(1 - \frac{1}{e}\right)$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Repeatedly Matching Items to Agents Fairly and Efficiently

We consider a novel setting where a set of items are matched to the same set of agents repeatedly over multiple rounds. Each agent gets exactly one item per round, which brings interesting challenges to finding efficient and/or fair {\em repeated matchings}. A particular feature of our model is that the value of an agent for an item in some round depends on the number of rounds in which the item has been used by the agent in the past. We present a set of positive and negative results about the efficiency and fairness of repeated matchings. For example, when items are goods, a variation of the well-studied fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) can be satisfied under certain conditions. Furthermore, it is intractable to achieve fairness and (approximate) efficiency simultaneously, even though they are achievable separately. For mixed items, which can be goods for some agents and chores for others, we propose and study a new notion of fairness that we call {\em swap envy-freeness} (swapEF).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

On Achieving Leximin Fairness and Stability in Many-to-One Matchings

The past few years have seen a surge of work on fairness in allocation problems where items must be fairly divided among agents having individual preferences. In comparison, fairness in settings with preferences on both sides, that is, where agents have to be matched to other agents, has received much less attention. Moreover, two-sided matching literature has largely focused on ordinal preferences. This paper initiates the study of fairness in stable many-to-one matchings under cardinal valuations. Motivated by real-world settings, we study leximin optimality over stable many-to-one matchings. We first investigate matching problems with ranked valuations where all agents on each side have the same preference orders or rankings over the agents on the other side (but not necessarily the same valuations). Here, we provide a complete characterisation of the space of stable matchings. This leads to FaSt, a novel and efficient algorithm to compute a leximin optimal stable matching under ranked isometric valuations (where, for each pair of agents, the valuation of one agent for the other is the same). Building upon FaSt, we present an efficient algorithm, FaSt-Gen, that finds the leximin optimal stable matching for a more general ranked setting. When there are exactly two agents on one side who may be matched to many agents on the other, strict preferences are enough to guarantee an efficient algorithm. We next establish that, in the absence of rankings and under strict preferences (with no restriction on the number of agents on either side), finding a leximin optimal stable matching is NP-Hard. Further, with weak rankings, the problem is strongly NP-Hard, even under isometric valuations. In fact, when additivity and non-negativity are the only assumptions, we show that, unless P=NP, no efficient polynomial factor approximation is possible.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

On the Coexistence of Stability and Incentive Compatibility in Fractional Matchings

Stable matchings have been studied extensively in social choice literature. The focus has been mostly on integral matchings, in which the nodes on the two sides are wholly matched. A fractional matching, which is a convex combination of integral matchings, is a natural extension of integral matchings. The topic of stability of fractional matchings has started receiving attention only very recently. Further, incentive compatibility in the context of fractional matchings has received very little attention. With this as the backdrop, our paper studies the important topic of incentive compatibility of mechanisms to find stable fractional matchings. We work with preferences expressed in the form of cardinal utilities. Our first result is an impossibility result that there are matching instances for which no mechanism that produces a stable fractional matching can be incentive compatible or even approximately incentive compatible. This provides the motivation to seek special classes of matching instances for which there exist incentive compatible mechanisms that produce stable fractional matchings. Our study leads to a class of matching instances that admit unique stable fractional matchings. We first show that a unique stable fractional matching for a matching instance exists if and only if the given matching instance satisfies the conditional mutual first preference (CMFP) property. To this end, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that makes ingenious use of envy-graphs to find a non-integral stable matching whenever the preferences are strict and the given instance is not a CMFP matching instance. For this class of CMFP matching instances, we prove that every mechanism that produces the unique stable fractional matching is (a) incentive compatible and further (b) resistant to coalitional manipulations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Design of Trusted Market Platforms using Permissioned Blockchains and Game Theory

The blockchain concept forms the backbone of a new wave technology that promises to be deployed extensively in a wide variety of industrial and societal applications. Governments, financial institutions, banks, industrial supply chains, service companies, and even educational institutions and hospitals are investing in a substantial manner in the hope of improving business efficiency and operational robustness through deployment of blockchain technology. This thesis work is concerned with designing trustworthy business-to-business (B2B) market platforms drawing upon blockchain technology and game theory. The proposed platform is built upon three key ideas. First, we use permissioned blockchains with smart contracts as a technically sound approach for building the B2B platform. The blockchain deploys smart contracts that govern the interactions of enterprise buyers and sellers. Second, the smart contracts are designed using a rigorous analysis of a repeated game model of the strategic interactions between buyers and sellers. We show that such smart contracts induce honest behavior from buyers and sellers. Third, we embed cryptographic regulation protocols into the permissioned blockchain to ensure that business sensitive information is not revealed to the competitors. We believe our work is an important step in the direction of building a powerful B2B platform that maximizes social welfare and enables trusted collaboration between strategic enterprise agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Fair Division of Indivisible Goods Among Strategic Agents

We study fair division of indivisible goods in a single-parameter environment. In particular, we develop truthful social welfare maximizing mechanisms for fairly allocating indivisible goods. Our fairness guarantees are in terms of solution concepts which are tailored to address allocation of indivisible goods and, hence, provide an appropriate framework for fair division of goods. This work specifically considers fairness in terms of envy freeness up to one good (EF1), maximin share guarantee (MMS), and Nash social welfare (NSW). Our first result shows that (in a single-parameter environment) the problem of maximizing welfare, subject to the constraint that the allocation of the indivisible goods is EF1, admits a polynomial-time, 1/2-approximate, truthful auction. We further prove that this problem is NP-Hard and, hence, an approximation is warranted. This hardness result also complements prior works which show that an arbitrary EF1 allocation can be computed efficiently. We also establish a bi-criteria approximation guarantee for the problem of maximizing social welfare under MMS constraints. In particular, we develop a truthful auction which efficiently finds an allocation wherein each agent gets a bundle of value at least $\left(1/2 - \varepsilon \right)$ times her maximin share and the welfare of the computed allocation is at least the optimal, here $\varepsilon >0$ is a fixed constant. We complement this result by showing that maximizing welfare is computationally hard even if one aims to only satisfy the MMS constraint approximately.

cs.GT↗