arXiv subjects

Shreya Prakash

Publications and source records attributed to Shreya Prakash.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Statistical Inference for Bivariate Functional Causal Discovery

Causal discovery methods aim to determine the causal direction between variables using observational data. Functional causal discovery methods rely on structural and distributional assumptions to determine directionality but typically lack statistical inference. This paper reviews the statistical guarantees of existing functional causal discovery methods in theory, software, and applied use, highlighting a key gap: the absence of a unified inferential framework that applies broadly across model classes. As a first step toward addressing this gap, we formalize a test-based approach for bivariate causal discovery by repurposing goodness-of-fit and independence tests within a hypothesis-testing framework. Because directionality is determined through two disjoint hypothesis tests, corresponding to four causal discovery outcomes, the approach provides explicit uncertainty quantification and diagnostic insight into assumption violations. Resampling is further used to estimate the rates of causal discovery outcomes, offering an additional layer of inference. We demonstrate the use and behavior of our inferential framework through simulations that vary the degree of assumption violation, as well as through real-data applications. We conclude with practical lessons and recommendations for advancing statistical guarantees in functional causal discovery.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Causal Discovery via Statistical Power (CDSP)

Causal discovery methods aim to infer causal direction from observational data. Functional causal discovery approaches use structural asymmetries to identify causal directionality but rely on strong modeling assumptions and provide limited tools for uncertainty quantification. We introduce Causal Discovery via Statistical Power (CDSP), a statistical inference framework that connects causal direction estimation with statistical power and enables uncertainty quantification. Considering the foundational setting of bivariate observational data, we show how quantities analogous to statistical power and effect size can be used in causal discovery to determine when data contain sufficient information to favor one direction over the other. We introduce the effect-size asymmetry assumption that characterizes when the probability of correctly detecting the causal direction (i.e., the power of causal discovery) exceeds that of incorrectly favoring the reverse direction. We show that the effect-size asymmetry assumption can be used for causal direction estimation with uncertainty quantification. Simulations show that CDSP direction estimation is robust to mild and moderate model misspecifications. Real data analyses on 100 cause-effect benchmark pairs further demonstrate that CDSP reduces false discovery rates by approximately 18% relative to a commonly used existing method.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Efficiently Identifying Low-Quality Language Subsets in Multilingual Datasets: A Case Study on a Large-Scale Multilingual Audio Dataset

Curating datasets that span multiple languages is challenging. To make the collection more scalable, researchers often incorporate one or more imperfect classifiers in the process, like language identification models. These models, however, are prone to failure, resulting in some language subsets being unreliable for downstream tasks. We introduce a statistical test, the Preference Proportion Test, for identifying such unreliable subsets. By annotating only 20 samples for a language subset, we're able to identify systematic transcription errors for 10 language subsets in a recent large multilingual transcribed audio dataset, X-IPAPack (Zhu et al., 2024). We find that filtering this low-quality data out when training models for the downstream task of phonetic transcription brings substantial benefits, most notably a 25.7% relative improvement on transcribing recordings in out-of-distribution languages. Our method lays a path forward for systematic and reliable multilingual dataset auditing.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

A Diagnostic Tool for Functional Causal Discovery

Causal discovery methods aim to determine the causal direction between variables using observational data. Functional causal discovery methods, such as those based on the Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (LiNGAM), rely on structural and distributional assumptions to infer the causal direction. However, approaches for assessing causal discovery methods' performance as a function of sample size or the impact of assumption violations, inevitable in real-world scenarios, are lacking. To address this need, we propose Causal Direction Detection Rate (CDDR) diagnostic that evaluates whether and to what extent the interaction between assumption violations and sample size affects the ability to identify the hypothesized causal direction. Given a bivariate dataset of size N on a pair of variables, X and Y, CDDR diagnostic is the plotted comparison of the probability of each causal discovery outcome (e.g. X causes Y, Y causes X, or inconclusive) as a function of sample size less than N. We fully develop CDDR diagnostic in a bivariate case and demonstrate its use for two methods, LiNGAM and our new test-based causal discovery approach. We find CDDR diagnostic for the test-based approach to be more informative since it uses a richer set of causal discovery outcomes. Under certain assumptions, we prove that the probability estimates of detecting each possible causal discovery outcome are consistent and asymptotically normal. Through simulations, we study CDDR diagnostic's behavior when linearity and non-Gaussianity assumptions are violated. Additionally, we illustrate CDDR diagnostic on four real datasets, including three for which the causal direction is known.

stat.ME↗