arXiv subjects

Shuangge Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Shuangge Wang.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Enhancing Goal Inference via Correction Timing

Corrections offer a natural modality for people to provide feedback to a robot, by (i) intervening in the robot's behavior when they believe the robot is failing (or will fail) the task objectives and (ii) modifying the robot's behavior to successfully fulfill the task. Each correction offers information on what the robot should and should not do, where the corrected behavior is more aligned with task objectives than the original behavior. Most prior work on learning from corrections involves interpreting a correction as a new demonstration (consisting of the modified robot behavior), or a preference (for the modified trajectory compared to the robot's original behavior). However, this overlooks one essential element of the correction feedback, which is the human's decision to intervene in the robot's behavior in the first place. This decision can be influenced by multiple factors including the robot's task progress, alignment with human expectations, dynamics, motion legibility, and optimality. In this work, we investigate whether the timing of this decision can offer a useful signal for inferring these task-relevant influences. In particular, we investigate three potential applications for this learning signal: (1) identifying features of a robot's motion that may prompt people to correct it, (2) quickly inferring the final goal of a human's correction based on the timing and initial direction of their correction motion, and (3) learning more precise constraints for task objectives. Our results indicate that correction timing results in improved learning for the first two of these applications. Overall, our work provides new insights on the value of correction timing as a signal for robot learning.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

TReF-6: Inferring Task-Relevant Frames from a Single Demonstration for One-Shot Skill Generalization

Robots often struggle to generalize from a single demonstration due to the lack of a transferable and interpretable spatial representation. In this work, we introduce TReF-6, a method that infers a simplified, abstracted 6DoF Task-Relevant Frame from a single trajectory. Our approach identifies an influence point purely from the trajectory geometry to define the origin for a local frame, which serves as a reference for parameterizing a Dynamic Movement Primitive (DMP). This influence point captures the task's spatial structure, extending the standard DMP formulation beyond start-goal imitation. The inferred frame is semantically grounded via a vision-language model and localized in novel scenes by Grounded-SAM, enabling functionally consistent skill generalization. We validate TReF-6 in simulation and demonstrate robustness to trajectory noise. We further deploy an end-to-end pipeline on real-world manipulation tasks, showing that TReF-6 supports one-shot imitation learning that preserves task intent across diverse object configurations.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Effects of Robot Competency and Motion Legibility on Human Correction Feedback

As robot deployments become more commonplace, people are likely to take on the role of supervising robots (i.e., correcting their mistakes) rather than directly teaching them. Prior works on Learning from Corrections (LfC) have relied on three key assumptions to interpret human feedback: (1) people correct the robot only when there is significant task objective divergence; (2) people can accurately predict if a correction is necessary; and (3) people trade off precision and physical effort when giving corrections. In this work, we study how two key factors (robot competency and motion legibility) affect how people provide correction feedback and their implications on these existing assumptions. We conduct a user study ($N=60$) under an LfC setting where participants supervise and correct a robot performing pick-and-place tasks. We find that people are more sensitive to suboptimal behavior by a highly competent robot compared to an incompetent robot when the motions are legible ($p=0.0015$) and predictable ($p=0.0055$). In addition, people also tend to withhold necessary corrections ($p < 0.0001$) when supervising an incompetent robot and are more prone to offering unnecessary ones ($p = 0.0171$) when supervising a highly competent robot. We also find that physical effort positively correlates with correction precision, providing empirical evidence to support this common assumption. We also find that this correlation is significantly weaker for an incompetent robot with legible motions than an incompetent robot with predictable motions ($p = 0.0075$). Our findings offer insights for accounting for competency and legibility when designing robot interaction behaviors and learning task objectives from corrections.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

Active Probing and Influencing Human Behaviors Via Autonomous Agents

Autonomous agents (robots) face tremendous challenges while interacting with heterogeneous human agents in close proximity. One of these challenges is that the autonomous agent does not have an accurate model tailored to the specific human that the autonomous agent is interacting with, which could sometimes result in inefficient human-robot interaction and suboptimal system dynamics. Developing an online method to enable the autonomous agent to learn information about the human model is therefore an ongoing research goal. Existing approaches position the robot as a passive learner in the environment to observe the physical states and the associated human response. This passive design, however, only allows the robot to obtain information that the human chooses to exhibit, which sometimes doesn't capture the human's full intention. In this work, we present an online optimization-based probing procedure for the autonomous agent to clarify its belief about the human model in an active manner. By optimizing an information radius, the autonomous agent chooses the action that most challenges its current conviction. This procedure allows the autonomous agent to actively probe the human agents to reveal information that's previously unavailable to the autonomous agent. With this gathered information, the autonomous agent can interactively influence the human agent for some designated objectives. Our main contributions include a coherent theoretical framework that unifies the probing and influence procedures and two case studies in autonomous driving that show how active probing can help to create better participant experience during influence, like higher efficiency or less perturbations.

cs.RO↗