SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Shubhan Patni

Publications and source records attributed to Shubhan Patni.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Human-Inspired Thumb-Index Robotic Hand with Strain Gauges Embedded in Soft Joints

Human hand grasp adaptation depends mainly on the synergy between physical structure and biological feedback. Inspired by this biomechanical principle, the Safe Thumb-Index Robotic (STIR) Hand was developed as a minimal, lightweight, and low-cost two-digit prototype featuring an asymmetric thumb-index configuration. By pairing an underactuated, tendon-driven mechanical design with flexible strain gauges embedded into silicone-encapsulated soft joints, the system achieves passive grasp adaptation while establishing both internal proprioception and external perception. Unsupervised analysis was carried out on a dataset of the STIR hand grasping 20 different objects, along with an object classification task and an ablation study to highlight the contribution of the soft joint sensors. The object classification task discriminated object size, shape, and material stiffness with a high classification accuracy. In contrast to traditional industrial grippers and robotic hands, the STIR Hand demonstrates that sensorized compliant joints significantly improve overall sensitivity and ensure safe grasping, while remaining independent of additional fingertip tactile elements or external vision systems. Finally, a comparison to similar devices grasping identical objects validates the utility of the STIR Hand.

cs.RO

Single-grasp deformable object discrimination: the effect of gripper morphology, sensing modalities, and action parameters

In haptic object discrimination, the effect of gripper embodiment, action parameters, and sensory channels has not been systematically studied. We used two anthropomorphic hands and two 2-finger grippers to grasp two sets of deformable objects. On the object classification task, we found: (i) among classifiers, SVM on sensory features and LSTM on raw time series performed best across all grippers; (ii) faster compression speeds degraded performance; (iii) generalization to different grasping configurations was limited; transfer to different compression speeds worked well for the Barrett Hand only. Visualization of the feature spaces using PCA showed that gripper morphology and action parameters were the main source of variance, making generalization across embodiment or grip configurations very difficult. On the highly challenging dataset consisting of polyurethane foams alone, only the Barrett Hand achieved excellent performance. Tactile sensors can thus provide a key advantage even if recognition is based on stiffness rather than shape. The data set with 24,000 measurements is publicly available.

cs.RO