arXiv subjects

Shuichi Hirahara

Publications and source records attributed to Shuichi Hirahara.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Improved Quantum Random Self-Reduction for Linear Problems

We study quantum random self-reductions for linear problems over finite fields. Let $M\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$ be an arbitrary matrix, and let $\mathcal{O}$ be an oracle that agrees with the linear map $x\mapsto Mx$ on an $\varepsilon$-fraction of inputs $x\sim\mathbb{F}^n$. Given coherent access to $\mathcal{O}$ and coherent entry access to $M$, we give a uniform quantum reduction that computes $Mx$ on any prescribed input $x$ with probability at least $2/3$ in time $\widetilde{O}(nT^{1/3})$, for $n\le T\le n^{3/2}$ and constant field size and $\varepsilon$, where $T$ is the cost of one coherent query to $\mathcal{O}$. In particular, when $T=\widetilde{O}(n)$, the reduction runs in time $\widetilde{O}(n^{4/3})$, improving the $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2}+T)$ reduction of Asadi, Golovnev, Gur, Shinkar, and Subramanian (SODA 2024). Our reduction uses the Bogolyubov--Ruzsa subspace guaranteed by additive combinatorics, but it avoids learning this subspace explicitly, which was computationally expensive for the previous reduction; in particular, it does not recover a basis for its orthogonal complement. The main technical step is to decompose the inputs into sparse pieces and find a vector that lies outside the Bogolyubov--Ruzsa subspace via a quantum search based on amplitude amplification. This yields a tunable tradeoff between the cost of querying the average-case oracle and the cost of verifying matrix-vector products.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

On the Complexity of Locally Dense Lattices

\emph{Locally dense lattices} are central gadgets used to prove the hardness of the Shortest Vector Problem and related lattice problems. Informally, a locally dense lattice is a lattice $\mathcal{L}$ that contains exponentially many lattice vectors inside some $\ell_p$ ball centered at $\vec{s}$ with radius at most an $α< 1$ fraction of the length of its shortest nonzero lattice vector. In this paper, taking a ``meta'' viewpoint on locally dense lattices, we introduce the \emph{Locally Dense Lattice Problem} (LDLP), the decision problem of determining whether a given input specifies a locally dense lattice. Our main result is that LDLP in $\ell_p$ norms for all finite $p \geq \log_2 3$ and for the infinity norm is complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. We also compare two standard definitions of local density that appear in prior work. Micciancio's original definition (FOCS 1998 and SICOMP 2001) uses integer coefficient vectors, while later work by Micciancio (ToC 2012) and by Bennett and Peikert (RANDOM 2023) uses short vectors in a shifted coset. We show that the corresponding promise problems are mutually reducible in deterministic polynomial time, which shows that the two formulations are robust.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

One-Sided-Error Parameterized Reductions for the Minimum Distance and Shortest Vector Problems

It is notoriously difficult to obtain deterministic reductions for the Minimum Distance Problem (MDP) and the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP). Under two-sided-error randomized reductions, Bennett, Cheraghchi, Guruswami, and Ribeiro (STOC 2023) proved parameterized hardness of approximation for these problems. We partially derandomize their reductions and present one-sided-error randomized reductions: MDP is W[1]-hard to approximate within an arbitrary constant factor under FPT many-one one-sided-error randomized reductions; For every $p \ge 1$, SVP in the $\ell_p$ norm is W[1]-hard to approximate within an arbitrary constant factor below $2^{1/p}$. We demonstrate the usefulness of one-sided-error randomized reductions by showing that they can be conditionally derandomized when the target problem has an OR function. Under a standard hardness-vs-randomness assumption, namely a plausible lower-bound assumption against nondeterministic circuits, we prove a general theorem formalizing this derandomization. Here, an OR function combines several instances into one instance that preserves their disjunction. We construct such OR functions for the relevant MDP and SVP gap problems, and thereby obtain deterministic W[1]-hardness for approximating MDP over every fixed finite field within every constant factor, and for approximating SVP in $\ell_p$ norms for every fixed integer $p$ within every factor below $2^{1/p}$. Applying the same framework to Micciancio's one-sided-error randomized reduction (ToC 2012) yields, under the same circuit lower-bound assumption, deterministic polynomial-time NP-hardness of approximating Euclidean SVP within every constant factor.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Optimal PSPACE-hardness of Approximating $q$-CSP Reconfiguration

In the Maxmin $q$-CSP Reconfiguration problem, given a satisfiable $q$-CSP instance and a pair of its satisfying assignments, we are asked to transform one assignment into the other by repeatedly changing the value assigned to a single variable. The objective is to find such a transformation that maximizes the minimum fraction of satisfied constraints along the transformation. In this paper, we prove that for any $q \geq 2$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, Maxmin $q$-CSP Reconfiguration is $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard to approximate within a factor of $\frac{1}{2^{q-1}}+\varepsilon$. To complement this hardness result, we prove that a $\bigl(\frac{1}{2^{q-1}}-\varepsilon\bigr)$-factor approximation for Maxmin $q$-CSP Reconfiguration is in $\mathsf{NP}$ in the perfect completeness case. These results establish the optimal $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hardness of approximating Maxmin $q$-CSP Reconfiguration for every $q \geq 2$ under $\mathsf{NP} \neq \mathsf{PSPACE}$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Reachability of Independent Sets and Vertex Covers Under Extended Reconfiguration Rules

In reconfiguration problems, we are given two feasible solutions to a graph problem and asked whether one can be transformed into the other via a sequence of feasible intermediate solutions under a given reconfiguration rule. While earlier work focused on modifying a single element at a time, recent studies have started examining how different rules impact computational complexity. Motivated by recent progress, we study Independent Set Reconfiguration (ISR) and Vertex Cover Reconfiguration (VCR) under the $k$-Token Jumping ($k$-TJ) and $k$-Token Sliding ($k$-TS) models. In $k$-TJ, up to $k$ vertices may be replaced, while $k$-TS additionally requires a perfect matching between removed and added vertices. It is known that the complexity of ISR crucially depends on $k$, ranging from PSPACE-complete and NP-complete to polynomial-time solvable. In this paper, we further explore the gradient of computational complexity of the problems. We first show that ISR under $k$-TJ with $k = |I| - μ$ remains NP-hard when $μ$ is any fixed positive integer and the input graph is restricted to graphs of maximum degree 3 or planar graphs of maximum degree 4, where $|I|$ is the size of feasible solutions. In addition, we prove that the problem belongs to NP not only for $μ=O(1)$ but also for $μ= O(\log |I|)$. In contrast, we show that VCR under $k$-TJ is in XP when parameterized by $μ= |S| - k$, where $|S|$ is the size of feasible solutions. Furthermore, we establish the PSPACE-completeness of ISR and VCR under both $k$-TJ and $k$-TS on several graph classes, for fixed $k$ as well as superconstant $k$ relative to the size of feasible solutions.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Asymptotically Optimal Inapproximability of E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration

In the Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration problem, we are given a satisfiable $k$-CNF formula $φ$ where each clause contains exactly $k$ literals, along with a pair of its satisfying assignments. The objective is transform one satisfying assignment into the other by repeatedly flipping the value of a single variable, while maximizing the minimum fraction of satisfied clauses of $φ$ throughout the transformation. In this paper, we demonstrate that the optimal approximation factor for Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration is $1 - Θ\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)$. On the algorithmic side, we develop a deterministic $\left(1-\frac{1}{k-1}-\frac{1}{k}\right)$-factor approximation algorithm for every $k \geq 3$. On the hardness side, we show that it is $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard to approximate this problem within a factor of $1-\frac{1}{10k}$ for every sufficiently large $k$. Note that an ``$\mathsf{NP}$ analogue'' of Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration is Max E$k$-SAT, whose approximation threshold is $1-\frac{1}{2^k}$ shown by Håstad (JACM 2001). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reconfiguration problem whose approximation threshold is (asymptotically) worse than that of its $\mathsf{NP}$ analogue. To prove the hardness result, we introduce a new ``non-monotone'' test, which is specially tailored to reconfiguration problems, despite not being helpful in the PCP regime.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Communication Complexity is NP-hard

In the paper where he first defined Communication Complexity, Yao asks: \emph{Is computing $CC(f)$ (the 2-way communication complexity of a given function $f$) NP-complete?} The problem of deciding whether $CC(f) \le k$, when given the communication matrix for $f$ and a number $k$, is easily seen to be in NP. Kushilevitz and Weinreb have shown that this problem is cryptographically hard. Here we show it is NP-hard.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Asymptotically Optimal Inapproximability of Maxmin $k$-Cut Reconfiguration

$k$-Coloring Reconfiguration is one of the most well-studied reconfiguration problems, which asks to transform a given proper $k$-coloring of a graph to another by repeatedly recoloring a single vertex. Its approximate version, Maxmin $k$-Cut Reconfiguration, is defined as an optimization problem of maximizing the minimum fraction of bichromatic edges during the transformation between (not necessarily proper) $k$-colorings. In this paper, we prove that the optimal approximation factor of this problem is $1 - Θ\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)$ for every $k \ge 2$. Specifically, we show the $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hardness of approximating the objective value within a factor of $1 - \frac{\varepsilon}{k}$ for some universal constant $\varepsilon > 0$, whereas we present a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that achieves the approximation factor of $1 - \frac{2}{k}$. To prove the hardness result, we develop a new probabilistic verifier that tests a ``striped'' pattern. Our polynomial-time algorithm is based on ``a random reconfiguration via a random solution,'' i.e., the transformation that goes through one random $k$-coloring.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Optimal Coding for Randomized Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications

The coding theorem for Kolmogorov complexity states that any string sampled from a computable distribution has a description length close to its information content. A coding theorem for resource-bounded Kolmogorov complexity is the key to obtaining fundamental results in average-case complexity, yet whether any samplable distribution admits a coding theorem for randomized time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity ($\mathsf{rK}^\mathsf{poly}$) is open and a common bottleneck in the recent literature of meta-complexity. Previous works bypassed this issue by considering probabilistic Kolmogorov complexity ($\mathsf{pK}^\mathsf{poly}$), in which public random bits are assumed to be available. In this paper, we present an efficient coding theorem for randomized Kolmogorov complexity under the non-existence of one-way functions, thereby removing the common bottleneck. This enables us to prove $\mathsf{rK}^\mathsf{poly}$ counterparts of virtually all the average-case results that were proved only for $\mathsf{pK}^\mathsf{poly}$, and enables the resolution of the open problems of Hirahara, Ilango, Lu, Nanashima, and Oliveira (STOC'23) and Hirahara, Kabanets, Lu, and Oliveira (CCC'24). The key technical lemma is that any distribution whose next bits are efficiently predictable admits an efficient encoding and decoding scheme, which could be of independent interest to data compression.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Optimal PSPACE-hardness of Approximating Set Cover Reconfiguration

In the Minmax Set Cover Reconfiguration problem, given a set system $\mathcal{F}$ over a universe and its two covers $\mathcal{C}^\mathsf{start}$ and $\mathcal{C}^\mathsf{goal}$ of size $k$, we wish to transform $\mathcal{C}^\mathsf{start}$ into $\mathcal{C}^\mathsf{goal}$ by repeatedly adding or removing a single set of $\mathcal{F}$ while covering the universe in any intermediate state. Then, the objective is to minimize the maximize size of any intermediate cover during transformation. We prove that Minmax Set Cover Reconfiguration and Minmax Dominating Set Reconfiguration are $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard to approximate within a factor of $2-\frac{1}{\operatorname{polyloglog} N}$, where $N$ is the size of the universe and the number of vertices in a graph, respectively, improving upon Ohsaka (SODA 2024) and Karthik C. S. and Manurangsi (2023). This is the first result that exhibits a sharp threshold for the approximation factor of any reconfiguration problem because both problems admit a $2$-factor approximation algorithm as per Ito, Demaine, Harvey, Papadimitriou, Sideri, Uehara, and Uno (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2011). Our proof is based on a reconfiguration analogue of the FGLSS reduction from Probabilistically Checkable Reconfiguration Proofs of Hirahara and Ohsaka (2024). We also prove that for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$, Minmax Hypergraph Vertex Cover Reconfiguration on $\operatorname{poly}(\varepsilon^{-1})$-uniform hypergraphs is $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard to approximate within a factor of $2-\varepsilon$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Probabilistically Checkable Reconfiguration Proofs and Inapproximability of Reconfiguration Problems

Motivated by the inapproximability of reconfiguration problems, we present a new PCP-type characterization of PSPACE, which we call a probabilistically checkable reconfiguration proof (PCRP): Any PSPACE computation can be encoded into an exponentially long sequence of polynomially long proofs such that every adjacent pair of the proofs differs in at most one bit, and every proof can be probabilistically checked by reading a constant number of bits. Using the new characterization, we prove PSPACE-completeness of approximate versions of many reconfiguration problems, such as the Maxmin $3$-SAT Reconfiguration problem. This resolves the open problem posed by Ito, Demaine, Harvey, Papadimitriou, Sideri, Uehara, and Uno (ISAAC 2008; Theor. Comput. Sci. 2011) as well as the Reconfiguration Inapproximability Hypothesis by Ohsaka (STACS 2023) affirmatively. We also present PSPACE-completeness of approximating the Maxmin Clique Reconfiguration problem to within a factor of $n^ε$ for some constant $ε> 0$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Symmetric Exponential Time Requires Near-Maximum Circuit Size

We show that there is a language in $\mathsf{S}_2\mathsf{E}/_1$ (symmetric exponential time with one bit of advice) with circuit complexity at least $2^n/n$. In particular, the above also implies the same near-maximum circuit lower bounds for the classes $Σ_2\mathsf{E}$, $(Σ_2\mathsf{E}\capΠ_2\mathsf{E})/_1$, and $\mathsf{ZPE}^{\mathsf{NP}}/_1$. Previously, only "half-exponential" circuit lower bounds for these complexity classes were known, and the smallest complexity class known to require exponential circuit complexity was $Δ_3\mathsf{E} = \mathsf{E}^{Σ_2\mathsf{P}}$ (Miltersen, Vinodchandran, and Watanabe COCOON'99). Our circuit lower bounds are corollaries of an unconditional zero-error pseudodeterministic algorithm with an $\mathsf{NP}$ oracle and one bit of advice ($\mathsf{FZPP}^{\mathsf{NP}}/_1$) that solves the range avoidance problem infinitely often. This algorithm also implies unconditional infinitely-often pseudodeterministic $\mathsf{FZPP}^{\mathsf{NP}}/_1$ constructions for Ramsey graphs, rigid matrices, two-source extractors, linear codes, and $\mathrm{K}^{\mathrm{poly}}$-random strings with nearly optimal parameters. Our proofs relativize. The two main technical ingredients are (1) Korten's $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{NP}}$ reduction from the range avoidance problem to constructing hard truth tables (FOCS'21), which was in turn inspired by a result of Jeřábek on provability in Bounded Arithmetic (Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 2004); and (2) the recent iterative win-win paradigm of Chen, Lu, Oliveira, Ren, and Santhanam (FOCS'23).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

Test of Quantumness with Small-Depth Quantum Circuits

Recently Brakerski, Christiano, Mahadev, Vazirani and Vidick (FOCS 2018) have shown how to construct a test of quantumness based on the learning with errors (LWE) assumption: a test that can be solved efficiently by a quantum computer but cannot be solved by a classical polynomial-time computer under the LWE assumption. This test has lead to several cryptographic applications. In particular, it has been applied to producing certifiable randomness from a single untrusted quantum device, self-testing a single quantum device and device-independent quantum key distribution. In this paper, we show that this test of quantumness, and essentially all the above applications, can actually be implemented by a very weak class of quantum circuits: constant-depth quantum circuits combined with logarithmic-depth classical computation. This reveals novel complexity-theoretic properties of this fundamental test of quantumness and gives new concrete evidence of the superiority of small-depth quantum circuits over classical computation.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Nearly Optimal Average-Case Complexity of Counting Bicliques Under SETH

In this paper, we seek a natural problem and a natural distribution of instances such that any $O(n^{c-ε})$-time algorithm fails to solve most instances drawn from the distribution, while the problem admits an $n^{c+o(1)}$-time algorithm that correctly solves all instances. Specifically, we consider the $K_{a,b}$ counting problem in a random bipartite graph, where $K_{a,b}$ is a complete bipartite graph for constants $a$ and $b$. We proved that the $K_{a,b}$ counting problem admits an $n^{a+o(1)}$-time algorithm if $a\geq 8$, while any $n^{a-ε}$-time algorithm fails to solve it even on random bipartite graph for any constant $ε>0$ under the Strong Exponential Time Hypotheis. Then, we amplify the hardness of this problem using the direct product theorem and Yao's XOR lemma by presenting a general framework of hardness amplification in the setting of fine-grained complexity.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2019

Beyond Natural Proofs: Hardness Magnification and Locality

Hardness magnification reduces major complexity separations (such as $\mathsf{\mathsf{EXP}} \nsubseteq \mathsf{NC}^1$) to proving lower bounds for some natural problem $Q$ against weak circuit models. Several recent works [OS18, MMW19, CT19, OPS19, CMMW19, Oli19, CJW19a] have established results of this form. In the most intriguing cases, the required lower bound is known for problems that appear to be significantly easier than $Q$, while $Q$ itself is susceptible to lower bounds but these are not yet sufficient for magnification. In this work, we provide more examples of this phenomenon, and investigate the prospects of proving new lower bounds using this approach. In particular, we consider the following essential questions associated with the hardness magnification program: Does hardness magnification avoid the natural proofs barrier of Razborov and Rudich [RR97]? Can we adapt known lower bound techniques to establish the desired lower bound for $Q$?

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

A Duality Between Depth-Three Formulas and Approximation by Depth-Two

We establish an explicit link between depth-3 formulas and one-sided approximation by depth-2 formulas, which were previously studied independently. Specifically, we show that the minimum size of depth-3 formulas is (up to a factor of n) equal to the inverse of the maximum, over all depth-2 formulas, of one-sided-error correlation bound divided by the size of the depth-2 formula, on a certain hard distribution. We apply this duality to obtain several consequences: 1. Any function f can be approximated by a CNF formula of size $O(ε2^n / n)$ with one-sided error and advantage $ε$ for some $ε$, which is tight up to a constant factor. 2. There exists a monotone function f such that f can be approximated by some polynomial-size CNF formula, whereas any monotone CNF formula approximating f requires exponential size. 3. Any depth-3 formula computing the parity function requires $Ω(2^{2 \sqrt{n}})$ gates, which is tight up to a factor of $\sqrt n$. This establishes a quadratic separation between depth-3 circuit size and depth-3 formula size. 4. We give a characterization of the depth-3 monotone circuit complexity of the majority function, in terms of a natural extremal problem on hypergraphs. In particular, we show that a known extension of Turan's theorem gives a tight (up to a polynomial factor) circuit size for computing the majority function by a monotone depth-3 circuit with bottom fan-in 2. 5. AC0[p] has exponentially small one-sided correlation with the parity function for odd prime p.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

Identifying an Honest ${\rm EXP}^{\rm NP}$ Oracle Among Many

We provide a general framework to remove short advice by formulating the following computational task for a function $f$: given two oracles at least one of which is honest (i.e. correctly computes $f$ on all inputs) as well as an input, the task is to compute $f$ on the input with the help of the oracles by a probabilistic polynomial-time machine, which we shall call a selector. We characterize the languages for which short advice can be removed by the notion of selector: a paddable language has a selector if and only if short advice of a probabilistic machine that accepts the language can be removed under any relativized world. Previously, instance checkers have served as a useful tool to remove short advice of probabilistic computation. We indicate that existence of instance checkers is a property stronger than that of removing short advice: although no instance checker for ${\rm EXP}^{\rm NP}$-complete languages exists unless ${\rm EXP}^{\rm NP} = {\rm NEXP}$, we prove that there exists a selector for any ${\rm EXP}^{\rm NP}$-complete language, by building on the proof of ${\rm MIP} = {\rm NEXP}$ by Babai, Fortnow, and Lund (1991).

cs.CC↗