arXiv subjects

Shunwen Bai

Publications and source records attributed to Shunwen Bai.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Who Leads Now? Token-Level Modality Arbitration for Chart-to-Code Generation

Chart-to-code generation requires a model to read the fine-grained visual details of a chart and write executable code that reproduces it. Existing chart-to-code methods either train visual and coding abilities separately, or fine-tune on chart-to-code data with the two abilities entangled. Neither strategy accounts for the distinct nature of the two abilities or the interference that arises when they are optimized together. We propose MoCA (Mixture of Cross-modal Arbitration), which separates the two abilities rather than blending them. MoCA is built on Cross-modal Arbitration Block (CAB), which maintains a visual branch and a code branch as two distinct pathways, and a lightweight arbiter that arbitrates their relative contributions at every layer and generated token. We train MoCA in two stages: a supervised warm-up on self-distilled reasoning trajectories that decomposes visual understanding into explicit steps, followed by reinforcement learning with rewards on both the reasoning process and the final code. Analysis shows that the arbiter learns structured rather than arbitrary allocations, with expert contributions varying systematically across tokens, layers, and instances. Across three benchmarks, MoCA delivers competitive performance against general-domain and chart-specialized models. Ablation results show that the gains cannot be attributed to a larger model size alone, but instead arise from the joint contributions of complementary visual and code branch initialization and input-conditioned arbitration through CAB.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

TsuGO: Probing Search Efficiency in LLM Reasoning via Go Life-and-Death Problems

The evaluation of LLM reasoning is moving from final-answer accuracy to process-level assessment, yet existing methods still fail to capture how models plan reasoning paths and allocate reasoning resources--that is, how they organize search. Prior process-level methods focus on the coherence and redundancy of chain-of-thought (CoT), and most benchmark tasks have a single objective solvable by static capabilities such as derivation and tool use, leaving search organization unmeasured. We introduce TsuGO, a process-level reasoning benchmark for evaluating Search Efficiency in LLM reasoning through Go life-and-death problems. These problems provide closed and verifiable solution spaces with an inherent adversarial structure, making candidate generation, response checking, branch comparison, and backtracking necessary parts of reasoning rather than incidental trace patterns. By constraining the solution space, TsuGO disentangles domain knowledge from search organization, parses CoT into a structured search tree, and reports Search Efficiency together with Token Efficiency and other diagnostic metrics and visualizations. Experiments show that current LLMs remain far from stable tsumego solving: stronger models succeed by finding the correct candidate earlier and sustaining effort on productive branches, but most models still behave much closer to unguided search algorithms than to neural-guided KataGo. Longer CoT or higher Token Efficiency does not necessarily imply better search. Our results identify search organization and reasoning-resource allocation as missing dimensions in LLM reasoning evaluation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CM-EVS: Sparse Panoramic RGB-D-Pose Data for Complete Scene Coverage

Modern 3D visual learning relies on observations sampled from metric 3D assets, yet existing scans, meshes, point clouds, simulations, and reconstructions do not directly provide a sparse, comparable, and geometry-consistent panoramic training interface. Dense trajectories duplicate nearby views, source-specific rendering policies yield heterogeneous annotations, and sparse heuristics may miss important regions or introduce depth-inconsistent observations. We study how to convert 3D assets into sparse panoramic RGB-D-pose data that preserves complete scene coverage with low redundancy and auditable provenance. We propose COVER (Coverage-Oriented Viewpoint curation with ERP Range-depth warping), a training-free ERP viewpoint curator that projects geometry observed from selected views into candidate ERP probes, scores incremental coverage, and penalizes depth conflicts. Under bounded proxy error, its greedy coverage proxy preserves the standard coverage-style approximation behavior up to an additive error term. Using COVER, we build CM-EVS (Coverage-curated Metric ERP View Set), a panoramic RGB-D-pose dataset with 36,373 curated ERP frames from 1,275 indoor scenes across Blender indoor, HM3D, and ScanNet++, complemented by outdoor panoramas from TartanGround and OB3D re-encoded into the same schema. Each frame provides full-sphere RGB, metric range depth, calibrated pose; COVER-produced indoor frames include per-step provenance logs. With a median of only 25 frames per indoor scene, CM-EVS covers all 13 unified room types while maintaining compact scene-level coverage. Experiments show that COVER improves the coverage-conflict trade-off, making CM-EVS a sparse, compact, and auditable RGB-D-pose resource for geometry-consistent panoramic 3D learning.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Ascending the Infinite Ladder: Benchmarking Spatial Deformation Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

Humans naturally possess the spatial reasoning ability to form and manipulate images and structures of objects in space. There is an increasing effort to endow Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with similar spatial reasoning capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand and manipulate spatial objects or not. To address this question, we propose a new evaluation framework aimed at assessing the performance of VLMs in spatial deformation reasoning tasks. Specifically, we construct a benchmark for spatial deformation reasoning from 2D to 3D. Leveraging our data engine, we can generate unlimited evaluation problem pairs with infinite steps, without any data leakage. We explore whether the model can effectively perform spatial deformation reasoning from two directions: forward reasoning (given the operations, find the final state) and reverse reasoning (given the final state, determine the operations). We adopt a ladder competition format, using the number of deformation steps as the level classification criterion, with the goal of exploring the boundaries of the model's deformation reasoning capabilities. Interestingly, the benchmarking results reveal that almost no model demonstrates plausible spatial deformation reasoning abilities. Furthermore, even after applying targeted training and mainstream reasoning enhancement methods, the models are still unable to perform well on 3D spatial deformation reasoning.

cs.CV↗