SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Shuping Jiang

Publications and source records attributed to Shuping Jiang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Hybrid Prior Bayesian Method for Combining Domestic Real-World Data and Overseas Data in Global Drug Development

Background Hybrid clinical trial design integrates randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with real-world data (RWD) to enhance efficiency through dynamic incorporation of external data. Existing methods like the Meta-Analytic Predictive Prior (MAP) inadequately control data heterogeneity, adjust baseline discrepancies, or optimize dynamic borrowing proportions, introducing bias and limiting applications in bridging trials and multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). Objective This study proposes a novel hybrid Bayesian framework (EQPS-rMAP) to address heterogeneity and bias in multi-source data integration, validated through simulations and retrospective case analyses of risankizumab's efficacy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Design and Methods EQPS-rMAP eliminates baseline covariate discrepancies via propensity score stratification, constructs stratum-specific MAP priors to dynamically adjust external data weights, and introduces equivalence probability weights to quantify data conflict risks. Performance was evaluated across six simulated scenarios (heterogeneity differences, baseline shifts) and real-world case analyses, comparing it with traditional methods (MAP, PSMAP, EBMAP) on estimation bias, type I error control, and sample size requirements. Results Simulations show EQPS-rMAP maintains estimation robustness under significant heterogeneity while reducing sample size demands and enhancing trial efficiency. Case analyses confirm superior external bias control and accuracy compared to conventional approaches. Conclusion and Significance EQPS-rMAP provides empirical evidence for hybrid clinical designs. By resolving baseline-heterogeneity conflicts through adaptive mechanisms, it enables reliable integration of external and real-world data in bridging trials, MRCTs, and post-marketing studies, broadening applicability without compromising rigor.

stat.ME

Regional consistency evaluation and sample size calculation under two MRCTs

Multi-regional clinical trial (MRCT) has been common practice for drug development and global registration. The FDA guidance `Demonstrating Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness for Human Drug and Biological Products Guidance for Industry' (FDA, 2019) requires that substantial evidence of effectiveness of a drug/biologic product to be demonstrated for market approval. In the situations where two pivotal MRCTs are needed to establish effectiveness of a specific indication for a drug or biological product, a systematic approach of consistency evaluation for regional effect is crucial. In this paper, we first present some existing regional consistency evaluations in a unified way that facilitates regional sample size calculation under the simple fixed effects model. Second, we extend the two commonly used consistency assessment criteria of MHLW (2007) in the context of two MRCTs and provide their evaluation and regional sample size calculation. Numerical studies demonstrate the proposed regional sample size attains the desired probability of showing regional consistency. A hypothetical example is presented to illustrate the application. We provide an R package for implementation.

stat.AP