arXiv subjects

Siddharth Barman

Publications and source records attributed to Siddharth Barman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2023

Approximation Algorithms for Envy-Free Cake Division with Connected Pieces

Cake cutting is a classic model for studying fair division of a heterogeneous, divisible resource among agents with individual preferences. Addressing cake division under a typical requirement that each agent must receive a connected piece of the cake, we develop approximation algorithms for finding envy-free (fair) cake divisions. In particular, this work improves the state-of-the-art additive approximation bound for this fundamental problem. Our results hold for general cake division instances in which the agents' valuations satisfy basic assumptions and are normalized (to have value $1$ for the cake). Furthermore, the developed algorithms execute in polynomial time under the standard Robertson-Webb query model. Prior work has shown that one can efficiently compute a cake division (with connected pieces) in which the additive envy of any agent is at most $1/3$. An efficient algorithm is also known for finding connected cake divisions that are (almost) $1/2$-multiplicatively envy-free. Improving the additive approximation guarantee and maintaining the multiplicative one, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a connected cake division that is both $\left(\frac{1}{4} +o(1) \right)$-additively envy-free and $\left(\frac{1}{2} - o(1) \right)$-multiplicatively envy-free. Our algorithm is based on the ideas of interval growing and envy-cycle-elimination. In addition, we study cake division instances in which the number of distinct valuations across the agents is parametrically bounded. We show that such cake division instances admit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for connected envy-free cake division.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Finding Fair Allocations under Budget Constraints

We study the fair allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical, additive valuations but individual budget constraints. Here, the indivisible goods--each with a specific size and value--need to be allocated such that the bundle assigned to each agent is of total size at most the agent's budget. Since envy-free allocations do not necessarily exist in the indivisible goods context, compelling relaxations--in particular, the notion of envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (EFk)--have received significant attention in recent years. In an EFk allocation, each agent prefers its own bundle over that of any other agent, up to the removal of $k$ goods, and the agents have similarly bounded envy against the charity (which corresponds to the set of all unallocated goods). Recently, Wu et al. (2021) showed that an allocation that satisfies the budget constraints and maximizes the Nash social welfare is $1/4$-approximately EF1. However, the computation (or even existence) of exact EFk allocations remained an intriguing open problem. We make notable progress towards this by proposing a simple, greedy, polynomial-time algorithm that computes EF2 allocations under budget constraints. Our algorithmic result implies the universal existence of EF2 allocations in this fair division context. The analysis of the algorithm exploits intricate structural properties of envy-freeness. Interestingly, the same algorithm also provides EF1 guarantees for important special cases. Specifically, we settle the existence of EF1 allocations for instances in which: (i) the value of each good is proportional to its size, (ii) all goods have the same size, or (iii) all the goods have the same value. Our EF2 result extends to the setting wherein the goods' sizes are agent specific.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Fair Chore Division under Binary Supermodular Costs

We study the problem of dividing indivisible chores among agents whose costs (for the chores) are supermodular set functions with binary marginals. Such functions capture complementarity among chores, i.e., they constitute an expressive class wherein the marginal disutility of each chore is either one or zero, and the marginals increase with respect to supersets. In this setting, we study the broad landscape of finding fair and efficient chore allocations. In particular, we establish the existence of $(i)$ EF1 and Pareto efficient chore allocations, $(ii)$ MMS-fair and Pareto efficient allocations, and $(iii)$ Lorenz dominating chore allocations. Furthermore, we develop polynomial-time algorithms--in the value oracle model--for computing the chore allocations for each of these fairness and efficiency criteria. Complementing these existential and algorithmic results, we show that in this chore division setting, the aforementioned fairness notions, namely EF1, MMS, and Lorenz domination are incomparable: an allocation that satisfies any one of these notions does not necessarily satisfy the others. Additionally, we study EFX chore division. In contrast to the above-mentioned positive results, we show that, for binary supermodular costs, Pareto efficient allocations that are even approximately EFX do not exist, for any arbitrarily small approximation constant. Focusing on EFX fairness alone, when the cost functions are identical we present an algorithm (Add-and-Fix) that computes an EFX allocation. For binary marginals, we show that Add-and-Fix runs in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Sublinear Approximation Algorithm for Nash Social Welfare with XOS Valuations

We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents with the objective of maximizing Nash social welfare (NSW). This welfare function is defined as the geometric mean of the agents' valuations and, hence, it strikes a balance between the extremes of social welfare (arithmetic mean) and egalitarian welfare (max-min value). Nash social welfare has been extensively studied in recent years for various valuation classes. In particular, a notable negative result is known when the agents' valuations are complement-free and are specified via value queries: for XOS valuations, one necessarily requires exponentially many value queries to find any sublinear (in $n$) approximation for NSW. Indeed, this lower bound implies that stronger query models are needed for finding better approximations. Towards this, we utilize demand oracles and XOS oracles; both of these query models are standard and have been used in prior work on social welfare maximization with XOS valuations. We develop the first sublinear approximation algorithm for maximizing Nash social welfare under XOS valuations, specified via demand and XOS oracles. Hence, this work breaks the $O(n)$-approximation barrier for NSW maximization under XOS valuations. We obtain this result by developing a novel connection between NSW and social welfare under a capped version of the agents' valuations. In addition to this insight, which might be of independent interest, this work relies on an intricate combination of multiple technical ideas, including the use of repeated matchings and the discrete moving knife method. In addition, we partially complement the algorithmic result by showing that, under XOS valuations, an exponential number of demand and XOS queries are necessarily required to approximate NSW within a factor of $\left(1 - \frac{1}{e}\right)$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Nash Welfare Guarantees for Fair and Efficient Coverage

We study coverage problems in which, for a set of agents and a given threshold $T$, the goal is to select $T$ subsets (of the agents) that, while satisfying combinatorial constraints, achieve fair and efficient coverage among the agents. In this setting, the valuation of each agent is equated to the number of selected subsets that contain it, plus one. The current work utilizes the Nash social welfare function to quantify the extent of fairness and collective efficiency. We develop a polynomial-time $\left(18 + o(1) \right)$-approximation algorithm for maximizing Nash social welfare in coverage instances. Our algorithm applies to all instances wherein, for the underlying combinatorial constraints, there exists an FPTAS for weight maximization. We complement the algorithmic result by proving that Nash social welfare maximization is APX-hard in coverage instances.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed Bandits

We extend the notion of regret with a welfarist perspective. Focussing on the classic multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework, the current work quantifies the performance of bandit algorithms by applying a fundamental welfare function, namely the Nash social welfare (NSW) function. This corresponds to equating algorithm's performance to the geometric mean of its expected rewards and leads us to the study of Nash regret, defined as the difference between the -- a priori unknown -- optimal mean (among the arms) and the algorithm's performance. Since NSW is known to satisfy fairness axioms, our approach complements the utilitarian considerations of average (cumulative) regret, wherein the algorithm is evaluated via the arithmetic mean of its expected rewards. This work develops an algorithm that, given the horizon of play $T$, achieves a Nash regret of $O \left( \sqrt{\frac{k \log T}{T}} \right)$, here $k$ denotes the number of arms in the MAB instance. Since, for any algorithm, the Nash regret is at least as much as its average regret (the AM-GM inequality), the known lower bound on average regret holds for Nash regret as well. Therefore, our Nash regret guarantee is essentially tight. In addition, we develop an anytime algorithm with a Nash regret guarantee of $O \left( \sqrt{\frac{k\log T}{T}} \log T \right)$.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Tight Approximation Bounds for Maximum Multi-Coverage

In the classic maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \dots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := |\cup_{i \in S} T_i|$. It is well-known that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an approximation ratio of $(1-e^{-1})$ and there is a matching inapproximability result. We note that in the maximum coverage problem if an element $e \in [n]$ is covered by several sets, it is still counted only once. By contrast, if we change the problem and count each element $e$ as many times as it is covered, then we obtain a linear objective function, $C^{(\infty)}(S) = \sum_{i \in S} |T_i|$, which can be easily maximized under a cardinality constraint. We study the maximum $\ell$-multi-coverage problem which naturally interpolates between these two extremes. In this problem, an element can be counted up to $\ell$ times but no more; hence, we consider maximizing the function $C^{(\ell)}(S) = \sum_{e \in [n]} \min\{\ell, |\{i \in S : e \in T_i\}| \}$, subject to the constraint $|S| \leq k$. Note that the case of $\ell = 1$ corresponds to the standard maximum coverage setting and $\ell = \infty$ gives us a linear objective. We develop an efficient approximation algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of $1 - \frac{\ell^{\ell}e^{-\ell}}{\ell!}$ for the $\ell$-multi-coverage problem. In particular, when $\ell = 2$, this factor is $1-2e^{-2} \approx 0.73$ and as $\ell$ grows the approximation ratio behaves as $1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π\ell}}$. We also prove that this approximation ratio is tight, i.e., establish a matching hardness-of-approximation result, under the Unique Games Conjecture.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Achieving Envy-Freeness with Limited Subsidies under Dichotomous Valuations

We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair manner. While envy-free allocations of indivisible goods are not guaranteed to exist, envy-freeness can be achieved by additionally providing some subsidy to the agents. These subsidies can be alternatively viewed as a divisible good (money) that is fractionally assigned among the agents to realize an envy-free outcome. In this setup, we bound the subsidy required to attain envy-freeness among agents with dichotomous valuations, i.e., among agents whose marginal value for any good is either zero or one. We prove that, under dichotomous valuations, there exists an allocation that achieves envy-freeness with a per-agent subsidy of either $0$ or $1$. Furthermore, such an envy-free solution can be computed efficiently in the standard value-oracle model. Notably, our results hold for general dichotomous valuations and, in particular, do not require the (dichotomous) valuations to be additive, submodular, or even subadditive. Also, our subsidy bounds are tight and provide a linear (in the number of agents) factor improvement over the bounds known for general monotone valuations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Intervention Efficient Algorithm for Two-Stage Causal MDPs

We study Markov Decision Processes (MDP) wherein states correspond to causal graphs that stochastically generate rewards. In this setup, the learner's goal is to identify atomic interventions that lead to high rewards by intervening on variables at each state. Generalizing the recent causal-bandit framework, the current work develops (simple) regret minimization guarantees for two-stage causal MDPs, with parallel causal graph at each state. We propose an algorithm that achieves an instance dependent regret bound. A key feature of our algorithm is that it utilizes convex optimization to address the exploration problem. We identify classes of instances wherein our regret guarantee is essentially tight, and experimentally validate our theoretical results.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Approximating Nash Social Welfare under Binary XOS and Binary Subadditive Valuations

We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair and economically efficient manner. In this context, the Nash social welfare-defined as the geometric mean of agents' valuations for their assigned bundles-stands as a fundamental measure that quantifies the extent of fairness of an allocation. Focusing on instances in which the agents' valuations have binary marginals, we develop essentially tight results for (approximately) maximizing Nash social welfare under two of the most general classes of complement-free valuations, i.e., under binary XOS and binary subadditive valuations. For binary XOS valuations, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm that finds a constant-factor (specifically $288$) approximation for the optimal Nash social welfare, in the standard value-oracle model. The allocations computed by our algorithm also achieve constant-factor approximation for social welfare and the groupwise maximin share guarantee. These results imply that-in the case of binary XOS valuations-there necessarily exists an allocation that simultaneously satisfies multiple (approximate) fairness and efficiency criteria. We complement the algorithmic result by proving that Nash social welfare maximization is APX-hard under binary XOS valuations. Furthermore, this work establishes an interesting separation between the binary XOS and binary subadditive settings. In particular, we prove that an exponential number of value queries are necessarily required to obtain even a sub-linear approximation for Nash social welfare under binary subadditive valuations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Truthful and Fair Mechanisms for Matroid-Rank Valuations

We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among strategic agents. We focus on settings wherein monetary transfers are not available and each agent's private valuation is a submodular function with binary marginals, i.e., the agents' valuations are matroid-rank functions. In this setup, we establish a notable dichotomy between two of the most well-studied fairness notions in discrete fair division; specifically, between envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and maximin shares (MMS). First, we show that a Pareto-efficient mechanism of Babaioff et al. (2021) is group strategy-proof for finding EF1 allocations, under matroid-rank valuations. The group strategy-proofness guarantee strengthens the result of Babaioff et al. (2021), that establishes truthfulness (individually for each agent) in the same context. Our result also generalizes a work of Halpern et al. (2020), from binary additive valuations to the matroid-rank case. Next, we establish that an analogous positive result cannot be achieved for MMS, even when considering truthfulness on an individual level. Specifically, we prove that, for matroid-rank valuations, there does not exist a truthful mechanism that is index oblivious, Pareto efficient, and maximin fair. For establishing our results, we develop a characterization of truthful mechanisms for matroid-rank functions. This characterization in fact holds for a broader class of valuations (specifically, holds for binary XOS functions) and might be of independent interest.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean Welfare

We study fair and efficient allocation of divisible goods, in an online manner, among $n$ agents. The goods arrive online in a sequence of $T$ time periods. The agents' values for a good are revealed only after its arrival, and the online algorithm needs to fractionally allocate the good, immediately and irrevocably, among the agents. Towards a unifying treatment of fairness and economic efficiency objectives, we develop an algorithmic framework for finding online allocations to maximize the generalized mean of the values received by the agents. In particular, working with the assumption that each agent's value for the grand bundle of goods is appropriately scaled, we address online maximization of $p$-mean welfare. Parameterized by an exponent term $p \in (-\infty, 1]$, these means encapsulate a range of welfare functions, including social welfare ($p=1$), egalitarian welfare ($p \to -\infty$), and Nash social welfare ($p \to 0$). We present a simple algorithmic template that takes a threshold as input and, with judicious choices for this threshold, leads to both universal and tailored competitive guarantees. First, we show that one can compute online a single allocation that $O (\sqrt{n} \log n)$-approximates the optimal $p$-mean welfare for all $p\le 1$. The existence of such a universal allocation is interesting in and of itself. Moreover, this universal guarantee achieves essentially tight competitive ratios for specific values of $p$. Next, we obtain improved competitive ratios for different ranges of $p$ by executing our algorithm with $p$-specific thresholds, e.g., we provide $O(\log ^3 n)$-competitive ratio for all $p\in (\frac{-1}{\log 2n},1)$. We complement our positive results by establishing lower bounds to show that our guarantees are essentially tight for a wide range of the exponent parameter.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair and Efficient Cake Division with Connected Pieces

The classic cake-cutting problem provides a model for addressing fair and efficient allocation of a divisible, heterogeneous resource (metaphorically, the cake) among agents with distinct preferences. Focusing on a standard formulation of cake cutting, in which each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake, this work establishes algorithmic and hardness results for multiple fairness/efficiency measures. First, we consider the well-studied notion of envy-freeness and develop an efficient algorithm that finds a cake division (with connected pieces) wherein the envy is multiplicatively within a factor of 2+o(1). The same algorithm in fact achieves an approximation ratio of 3+o(1) for the problem of finding cake divisions with as large a Nash social welfare (NSW) as possible. NSW is another standard measure of fairness and this work also establishes a connection between envy-freeness and NSW: approximately envy-free cake divisions (with connected pieces) always have near-optimal Nash social welfare. Furthermore, we develop an approximation algorithm for maximizing the $ρ$-mean welfare--this unifying objective, with different values of $ρ$, interpolates between notions of fairness (NSW) and efficiency (average social welfare). Finally, we complement these algorithmic results by proving that maximizing NSW (and, in general, the $ρ$-mean welfare) is APX-hard in the cake-division context.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios

This work develops algorithmic results for the classic cake-cutting problem in which a divisible, heterogeneous resource (modeled as a cake) needs to be partitioned among agents with distinct preferences. We focus on a standard formulation of cake cutting wherein each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake. While multiple hardness results exist in this setup for finding fair/efficient cake divisions, we show that, if the value densities of the agents satisfy the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP), then strong algorithmic results hold for various notions of fairness and economic efficiency. Addressing cake-cutting instances with MLRP, first we develop an algorithm that finds cake divisions (with connected pieces) that are envy-free, up to an arbitrary precision. The time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the number of agents and the bit complexity of an underlying Lipschitz constant. We obtain similar positive results for maximizing social (utilitarian) and egalitarian welfare. In addition, we show that, under MLRP, the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS). Many distribution families bear MLRP. In particular, this property holds if all the value densities belong to any one of the following families: Gaussian (with the same variance), linear, binomial, Poisson, and exponential distributions. Furthermore, it is known that linear translations of any log-concave function satisfy MLRP. Therefore, our results also hold when the value densities of the agents are linear translations of the following (log-concave) distributions: Laplace, gamma, beta, Subbotin, chi-square, Dirichlet, and logistic. Hence, through MLRP, the current work obtains novel cake-cutting algorithms for multiple distribution families.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Optimal Algorithms for Range Searching over Multi-Armed Bandits

This paper studies a multi-armed bandit (MAB) version of the range-searching problem. In its basic form, range searching considers as input a set of points (on the real line) and a collection of (real) intervals. Here, with each specified point, we have an associated weight, and the problem objective is to find a maximum-weight point within every given interval. The current work addresses range searching with stochastic weights: each point corresponds to an arm (that admits sample access) and the point's weight is the (unknown) mean of the underlying distribution. In this MAB setup, we develop sample-efficient algorithms that find, with high probability, near-optimal arms within the given intervals, i.e., we obtain PAC (probably approximately correct) guarantees. We also provide an algorithm for a generalization wherein the weight of each point is a multi-dimensional vector. The sample complexities of our algorithms depend, in particular, on the size of the optimal hitting set of the given intervals. Finally, we establish lower bounds proving that the obtained sample complexities are essentially tight. Our results highlight the significance of geometric constructs -- specifically, hitting sets -- in our MAB setting.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Existence and Computation of Maximin Fair Allocations Under Matroid-Rank Valuations

We study fair and economically efficient allocation of indivisible goods among agents whose valuations are rank functions of matroids. Such valuations constitute a well-studied class of submodular functions (i.e., they exhibit a diminishing returns property) and model preferences in several resource-allocation settings. We prove that, for matroid-rank valuations, a social welfare-maximizing allocation that gives each agent her maximin share always exists. Furthermore, such an allocation can be computed in polynomial time. We establish similar existential and algorithmic results for the pairwise maximin share guarantee as well. To complement these results, we show that if the agents have binary XOS valuations or weighted-rank valuations, then maximin fair allocations are not guaranteed to exist. Both of these valuation classes are immediate generalizations of matroid-rank functions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Tight Approximation Guarantees for Concave Coverage Problems

In the maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \ldots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := \Big|\bigcup_{i \in S} T_i\Big|$. It is a classic result that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an optimal approximation ratio of $1-e^{-1}$. In this work we consider a generalization of this problem wherein an element $a$ can contribute by an amount that depends on the number of times it is covered. Given a concave, nondecreasing function $φ$, we define $C^φ(S) := \sum_{a \in [n]}w_aφ(|S|_a)$, where $|S|_a = |\{i \in S : a \in T_i\}|$. The standard maximum coverage problem corresponds to taking $φ(j) = \min\{j,1\}$. For any such $φ$, we provide an efficient algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio equal to the Poisson concavity ratio of $φ$, defined by $α_φ := \min_{x \in \mathbb{N}^*} \frac{\mathbb{E}[φ(\text{Poi}(x))]}{φ(\mathbb{E}[\text{Poi}(x)])}$. Complementing this approximation guarantee, we establish a matching NP-hardness result when $φ$ grows in a sublinear way. As special cases, we improve the result of [Barman et al., IPCO, 2020] about maximum multi-coverage, that was based on the unique games conjecture, and we recover the result of [Dudycz et al., IJCAI, 2020] on multi-winner approval-based voting for geometrically dominant rules. Our result goes beyond these special cases and we illustrate it with applications to distributed resource allocation problems, welfare maximization problems and approval-based voting for general rules.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Optimal Bounds on the Price of Fairness for Indivisible Goods

In the allocation of resources to a set of agents, how do fairness guarantees impact the social welfare? A quantitative measure of this impact is the price of fairness, which measures the worst-case loss of social welfare due to fairness constraints. While initially studied for divisible goods, recent work on the price of fairness also studies the setting of indivisible goods. In this paper, we resolve the price of two well-studied fairness notions for the allocation of indivisible goods: envy-freeness up to one good (EF1), and approximate maximin share (MMS). For both EF1 and 1/2-MMS guarantees, we show, via different techniques, that the price of fairness is $O(\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of agents. From previous work, it follows that our bounds are tight. Our bounds are obtained via efficient algorithms. For 1/2-MMS, our bound holds for additive valuations, whereas for EF1, our bound holds for the more general class of subadditive valuations. This resolves an open problem posed by Bei et al. (2019).

cs.GT↗