arXiv subjects

Siddhartha Banerjee

Publications and source records attributed to Siddhartha Banerjee.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Online Fair Allocation of Perishable Resources

We consider a practically motivated variant of the canonical online fair allocation problem: a decision-maker has a budget of perishable resources to allocate over a fixed number of rounds. Each round sees a random number of arrivals, and the decision-maker must commit to an allocation for these individuals before moving on to the next round. The goal is to construct a sequence of allocations that is envy-free and efficient. Our work makes two important contributions toward this problem: we first derive strong lower bounds on the optimal envy-efficiency trade-off, demonstrating that a decision-maker is fundamentally limited in what she can hope to achieve relative to the no-perishing setting; we then design an algorithm achieving these lower bounds which takes as input (i) a prediction of the perishing order, and (ii) a desired bound on envy. Given the remaining budget in each period, the algorithm uses forecasts of future demand perishing to adaptively choose from one of two carefully constructed guardrail quantities. We demonstrate our algorithm's strong numerical performance, and state-of-the-art, perishing-agnostic algorithms' inefficacy, on simulations calibrated to a real-world dataset.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

The Price of Competitive Information Disclosure

In many decision-making scenarios, individuals strategically choose what information to disclose to optimize their own outcomes. It is unclear whether such strategic information disclosure can lead to good societal outcomes. To address this question, we consider a competitive Bayesian persuasion model in which multiple agents selectively disclose information about their qualities to a principal, who aims to choose the candidates with the highest qualities. Using the price-of-anarchy framework, we quantify the inefficiency of such strategic disclosure. We show that the price of anarchy is at most a constant when the agents have independent quality distributions, even if their utility functions are heterogeneous. This result provides the first theoretical guarantee on the limits of inefficiency in Bayesian persuasion with competitive information disclosure.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Water-Filling is Universally Minimax Optimal

Allocation of dynamically-arriving (i.e., online) divisible resources among a set of offline agents is a fundamental problem, with applications to online marketplaces, scheduling, portfolio selection, signal processing, and many other areas. The water-filling algorithm, which allocates an incoming resource to maximize the minimum load of compatible agents, is ubiquitous in many of these applications whenever the underlying objectives prefer more balanced solutions; however, the analysis and guarantees differ across settings. We provide a justification for the widespread use of water-filling by showing that it is a universally minimax optimal policy in a strong sense. Formally, our main result implies that water-filling is minimax optimal for a large class of objectives -- including both Schur-concave maximization and Schur-convex minimization -- under $α$-regret and competitive ratio measures. This optimality holds for every fixed tuple of agents and resource counts. Remarkably, water-filling achieves these guarantees as a myopic policy, remaining entirely agnostic to the objective function, agent count, and resource availability. Our techniques notably depart from the popular primal-dual analysis of online algorithms, and instead develop a novel way to apply the theory of majorization in online settings to achieve universality guarantees.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Robust Resource Allocation via Competitive Subsidies

A canonical setting for non-monetary online resource allocation is one where agents compete over multiple rounds for a single item per round, with i.i.d. valuations and additive utilities across rounds. With $n$ symmetric agents, a natural benchmark for each agent is the utility realized by her favorite $1/n$-fraction of rounds; a line of work has demonstrated one can robustly guarantee each agent a constant fraction of this ideal utility, irrespective of how other agents behave. In particular, several mechanisms have been shown to be $1/2$-robust, and recent work established that repeated first-price auctions based on artificial credits have a robustness factor of $0.59$, which cannot be improved beyond $0.6$ using first-price and simple strategies. In contrast, even without strategic considerations, the best achievable factor is $1-1/e\approx 0.63$. In this work, we break the $0.6$ first-price barrier to get a new $0.625$-robust mechanism, which almost closes the gap to the non-strategic robustness bound. Surprisingly, we do so via a simple auction, where in each round, bidders decide if they ask for the item, and we allocate uniformly at random among those who ask. The main new ingredient is the idea of competitive subsidies, wherein we charge the winning agent an amount in artificial credits that decreases when fewer agents are bidding (specifically, when $k$ agents bid, then the winner pays proportional to $k/(k+1)$, varying the payment by a factor of 2 depending on the competition). Moreover, we show how it can be modified to get an equilibrium strategy with a slightly weaker robust guarantee of $5/(3e) \approx 0.61$ (and the optimal $1-1/e$ factor at equilibrium). Finally, we show that our mechanism gives the best possible bound under a wide class of auction-based mechanisms.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Robust Equilibria in Shared Resource Allocation via Strengthening Border's Theorem

We consider repeated allocation of a shared resource via a non-monetary mechanism, wherein a single item must be allocated to one of multiple agents in each round. We assume that each agent has i.i.d. values for the item across rounds, and additive utilities. Past work on this problem has proposed mechanisms where agents can get one of two kinds of guarantees: $(i)$ (approximate) Bayes-Nash equilibria via linkage-based mechanisms which need extensive knowledge of the value distributions, and $(ii)$ simple distribution-agnostic mechanisms with robust utility guarantees for each individual agent, which are worse than the Nash outcome, but hold irrespective of how others behave (including possibly collusive behavior). Recent work has hinted at barriers to achieving both simultaneously. Our work however establishes this is not the case, by proposing the first mechanism in which each agent has a natural strategy that is both a Bayes-Nash equilibrium and also comes with strong robust guarantees for individual agent utilities. Our mechanism comes out of a surprising connection between the online shared resource allocation problem and implementation theory, and uses a surprising strengthening of Border's theorem. In particular, we show that establishing robust equilibria in this setting reduces to showing that a particular subset of the Border polytope is non-empty. We establish this via a novel joint Schur-convexity argument. This strengthening of Border's criterion for obtaining a stronger conclusion is of independent technical interest, as it may prove useful in other settings.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Dynamic Allocation of Public Goods with Approximate Core Equilibria

We consider the problem of repeatedly allocating multiple shareable public goods that have limited availability in an online setting without the use of money. In our setting, agents have additive values, and the value each agent receives from getting access to the goods in each period is drawn i.i.d. from some joint distribution $\mathcal{D}$ (that can be arbitrarily correlated between agents). The principal also has global constraints on the set of goods they can select over the horizon, which is represented via a submodular allocation-cost function. Our goal is to select the periods to allocate the good to ensure high value for each group of agents. We develop mechanisms for this problem using an artificial currency, where we give each agent a budget proportional to their (exogenous) fair share. The correlated value distribution makes this an especially challenging problem, as agents may attempt to free-ride by declaring low valuations for the good when they know other agents have high values-hoping those agents will bear a larger share of the cost of the resource. We offer a black-box reduction from monetary mechanisms for the allocation of a costly excludable public good. We focus on pacing strategies, the natural strategies when using AI agents, where agents report a scaled version of their value to the mechanism. Our main results show that when using a truthful monetary mechanism as our building block, the resulting online mechanism has a focal equilibrium in which each agent plays a pacing strategy whose outcome results in an allocation that is a $(\mathcal{H}_n-1)$-approximation of the core, where $\mathcal{H}_n$ is the Harmonic number, and $n$ is the number of agents. Remarkably, we are able to achieve an approximate core solution as a Nash outcome without explicit collaboration or coordination between the agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Sequential Fair Allocation With Replenishments: A Little Envy Goes An Exponentially Long Way

We study the trade-off between envy and inefficiency in repeated resource allocation settings with stochastic replenishments, motivated by real-world systems such as food banks and medical supply chains. Specifically, we consider a model in which a decision-maker faced with stochastic demand and resource donations must trade off between an equitable and efficient allocation of resources over an infinite horizon. The decision-maker has access to storage with fixed capacity $M$, and incurs efficiency losses when storage is empty (stockouts) or full (overflows). We provide a nearly tight (up to constant factors) characterization of achievable envy-inefficiency pairs. Namely, we introduce a class of Bang-Bang control policies whose inefficiency exhibits a sharp phase transition, dropping from $Θ(1/M)$ when $Δ= 0$ to $e^{-Ω(ΔM)}$ when $Δ> 0$, where $Δ$ is used to denote the target envy of the policy. We complement this with matching lower bounds, demonstrating that the trade-off is driven by supply, as opposed to demand uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that envy-inefficiency trade-offs not only persist in settings with dynamic replenishment, but are shaped by the decision-maker's available capacity, and are therefore qualitatively different compared to previously studied settings with fixed supply.

math.OC↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Worst-Case Online Allocation via Dynamic Max-min Fairness

We study the allocation of shared resources over multiple rounds among competing agents, via the dynamic max-min fair (DMMF) mechanism: the good in each round is allocated to the requesting agent with the least number of allocations received to date. We show that in large markets when an agent has i.i.d. values across rounds, under mild distributional assumptions (e.g., bounded PDF function), the DMMF mechanism allows each agent to realize a $1 - o(1)$ fraction of her ideal utility -- her highest achievable utility given her nominal share of resources. This guarantee holds under arbitrary behavior by other agents and is achieved by characterizing the agent's utility under a rich space of strategies, wherein an agent can tune how aggressive to be in requesting the item. Our techniques also allow us to handle settings where an agent's values are correlated across rounds, thereby allowing an adversary to predict and block her future values. By tuning the aggressiveness, an agent can guarantee $Ω(γ)$ fraction of her ideal utility, where $γ\in [0, 1]$ is a parameter that quantifies dependence across rounds (with $γ= 1$ indicating full independence and lower values indicating more correlation). Finally, we extend our efficiency results to the case of reusable resources, where an agent might need to hold the item over multiple rounds to receive utility. Our results subsume previous guarantees obtained using a more complicated mechanism proving a half ideal utility guarantee under i.i.d. values sampled from worst-case distributions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Online Resource Sharing: Better Robust Guarantees via Randomized Strategies

We study the problem of fair online resource allocation via non-monetary mechanisms, where multiple agents repeatedly share a resource without monetary transfers. Previous work has shown that every agent can guarantee $1/2$ of their ideal utility (the highest achievable utility given their fair share of resources) robustly, i.e., under arbitrary behavior by the other agents. While this $1/2$-robustness guarantee has now been established under very different mechanisms, including pseudo-markets and dynamic max-min allocation, improving on it has appeared difficult. In this work, we obtain the first significant improvement on the robustness of online resource sharing. In more detail, we consider the widely-studied repeated first-price auction with artificial currencies. Our main contribution is to show that a simple randomized bidding strategy can guarantee each agent a $2 - \sqrt 2 \approx 0.59$ fraction of her ideal utility, irrespective of others' bids. Specifically, our strategy requires each agent with fair share $α$ to use a uniformly distributed bid whenever her value is in the top $α$-quantile of her value distribution. Our work almost closes the gap to the known $1 - 1/e \approx 0.63$ hardness for robust resource sharing; we also show that any static (i.e., budget independent) bidding policy cannot guarantee more than a $0.6$-fraction of the ideal utility, showing our technique is almost tight.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Artificial Replay: A Meta-Algorithm for Harnessing Historical Data in Bandits

Most real-world deployments of bandit algorithms exist somewhere in between the offline and online set-up, where some historical data is available upfront and additional data is collected dynamically online. How best to incorporate historical data to "warm start" bandit algorithms is an open question: naively initializing reward estimates using all historical samples can suffer from spurious data and imbalanced data coverage, leading to data inefficiency (amount of historical data used) - particularly for continuous action spaces. To address these challenges, we propose ArtificialReplay, a meta-algorithm for incorporating historical data into any arbitrary base bandit algorithm. We show that ArtificialReplay uses only a fraction of the historical data compared to a full warm-start approach, while still achieving identical regret for base algorithms that satisfy independence of irrelevant data (IIData), a novel and broadly applicable property that we introduce. We complement these theoretical results with experiments on K-armed bandits and continuous combinatorial bandits, on which we model green security domains using real poaching data. Our results show the practical benefits of ArtificialReplay for improving data efficiency, including for base algorithms that do not satisfy IIData.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Allocating Public Goods via Dynamic Max-Min Fairness: Long-Run Behavior and Competitive Equilibria

Dynamic max-min fair allocation (DMMF) is a simple and popular mechanism for the repeated allocation of a shared resource among competing agents: in each round, each agent can choose to request or not for the resource, which is then allocated to the requesting agent with the least number of allocations received till then. Recent work has shown that under DMMF, a simple threshold-based request policy enjoys surprisingly strong robustness properties, wherein each agent can realize a significant fraction of her optimal utility irrespective of how other agents' behave. While this goes some way in mitigating the possibility of a 'tragedy of the commons' outcome, the robust policies require that an agent defend against arbitrary (possibly adversarial) behavior by other agents. This however may be far from optimal compared to real world settings, where other agents are selfish optimizers rather than adversaries. Therefore, robust guarantees give no insight on how agents behave in an equilibrium, and whether outcomes are improved under one. Our work aims to bridge this gap by studying the existence and properties of equilibria under DMMF. To this end, we first show that despite the strong robustness guarantees of the threshold based strategies, no Nash equilibrium exists when agents participate in DMMF, each using some fixed threshold-based policy. On the positive side, however, we show that for the symmetric case, a simple data-driven request policy guarantees that no agent benefits from deviating to a different fixed threshold policy. In our proposed policy agents aim to match the historical allocation rate with a vanishing drift towards the rate optimizing overall welfare for all users. Furthermore, the resulting equilibrium outcome can be significantly better compared to what follows from the robustness guarantees.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Majorized Bayesian Persuasion and Fair Selection

We address the fundamental problem of selection under uncertainty by modeling it from the perspective of Bayesian persuasion. In our model, a decision maker with imperfect information always selects the option with the highest expected value. We seek to achieve fairness among the options by revealing additional information to the decision maker and hence influencing its subsequent selection. To measure fairness, we adopt the notion of majorization, aiming at simultaneously approximately maximizing all symmetric, monotone, concave functions over the utilities of the options. As our main result, we design a novel information revelation policy that achieves a logarithmic-approximation to majorization in polynomial time. On the other hand, no policy, regardless of its running time, can achieve a constant-approximation to majorization. Our work is the first non-trivial majorization result in the Bayesian persuasion literature with multi-dimensional information sets.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Price Competition Under A Consider-Then-Choose Model With Lexicographic Choice

The sorting and filtering capabilities offered by modern e-commerce platforms significantly impact customers' purchase decisions, as well as the resulting prices set by competing sellers on these platforms. Motivated by this practical reality, we study price competition under a flexible choice model: Consider-then-Choose with Lexicographic Choice (CLC). In this model, a customer first forms a consideration set of sellers based on (i) her willingness-to-pay and (ii) an arbitrary set of criteria on items' non-price attributes; she then chooses the highest-ranked item according to a lexicographic ranking in which items with better performance on more important attributes are ranked higher. We provide a structural characterization of equilibria in the resulting game of price competition, and derive an economically interpretable condition, which we call gradient dominance, under which equilibria can be computed efficiently. For this subclass of CLC models, we prove that distributed gradient-based pricing dynamics converge to the set of equilibria. Extensive numerical experiments show robustness of our theoretical findings when gradient dominance does not hold.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

The SMART approach to instance-optimal online learning

We devise an online learning algorithm -- titled Switching via Monotone Adapted Regret Traces (SMART) -- that adapts to the data and achieves regret that is instance optimal, i.e., simultaneously competitive on every input sequence compared to the performance of the follow-the-leader (FTL) policy and the worst case guarantee of any other input policy. We show that the regret of the SMART policy on any input sequence is within a multiplicative factor $e/(e-1) \approx 1.58$ of the smaller of: 1) the regret obtained by FTL on the sequence, and 2) the upper bound on regret guaranteed by the given worst-case policy. This implies a strictly stronger guarantee than typical `best-of-both-worlds' bounds as the guarantee holds for every input sequence regardless of how it is generated. SMART is simple to implement as it begins by playing FTL and switches at most once during the time horizon to the worst-case algorithm. Our approach and results follow from an operational reduction of instance optimal online learning to competitive analysis for the ski-rental problem. We complement our competitive ratio upper bounds with a fundamental lower bound showing that over all input sequences, no algorithm can get better than a $1.43$-fraction of the minimum regret achieved by FTL and the minimax-optimal policy. We also present a modification of SMART that combines FTL with a ``small-loss" algorithm to achieve instance optimality between the regret of FTL and the small loss regret bound.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Hot Electron Generation and Manipulation in Nano-spiked Plasmonic Cavity Arrays

The generation of the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) on the surface of plasmonic structures in the nanoscale has paved the way for advanced biosensing, surpassing the conventional detection limits. The electric field enhancement (electromagnetic hot spots) between two plasmonic nano structures at close quarters produces hot electrons with a change in the electron density of the material. Techniques such as photoinjection are suitable to inject hot electrons from the metal crossing the Schottky barrier to the semiconductor leading to the development of photocurrent. sea urchin looking spiked nanoparticles serve a great interest in research of plasmonic materials as they can generate hot electrons at higher rate compared to other structures. By means of finite element method (FEM) analysis, we investigate the electric field enhancement generated between the cavity of nano star spike pairs and extend the study to an array of them. We further do a parametric study and identify the importance of using such an array to generate hot electrons whose applications are envisaged for light harvesting, enhanced photodetection, photo catalysis etc.

physics.optics↗

arXiv2023

Robust Pseudo-Markets for Reusable Public Resources

We study non-monetary mechanisms for the fair and efficient allocation of reusable public resources, i.e., resources used for varying durations. We consider settings where a limited resource is repeatedly shared among a set of agents, each of whom may request to use the resource over multiple consecutive rounds, receiving utility only if they get to use the resource for the full duration of their request. Such settings are of particular significance in scientific research where large-scale instruments such as electron microscopes, particle colliders, or telescopes are shared between multiple research groups; this model also subsumes and extends existing models of repeated non-monetary allocation where resources are required for a single round only. We study a simple pseudo-market mechanism where upfront we endow each agent with a budget of artificial credits, proportional to the fair share of the resource we want the agent to receive. The endowments thus define for each agent her ideal utility as that which she derives from her favorite allocation with no competition, but subject to getting at most her fair share of the resource across rounds. Next, on each round, and for each available resource item, our mechanism runs a first-price auction with a selective reserve, wherein each agent submits a desired duration and a per-round-bid, which must be at least the reserve price if requesting for multiple rounds; the bidder with the highest per-round-bid wins, and gets to use the item for the desired duration. We consider this problem in a Bayesian setting and show that under a carefully chosen reserve price, irrespective of how others bid, each agent has a simple strategy that guarantees she receives a $1/2$ fraction of her ideal utility in expectation. We also show this result is tight, i.e., no mechanism can guarantee that all agents get more than half of their ideal utility.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Allocating with Priorities and Quotas: Algorithms, Complexity, and Dynamics

In many applications such as rationing medical care and supplies, university admissions, and the assignment of public housing, the decision of who receives an allocation can be justified by various normative criteria. Such settings have motivated the following priority-respecting allocation problem: several categories, each with a quota of interchangeable items, wish to allocate the items among a set of agents. Each category has a list of eligible agents and a priority ordering over these agents; agents may be eligible in multiple categories. The goal is to select a valid allocation: one that respects quotas, eligibility, and priorities and ensures Pareto efficiency. We provide an algorithmic characterization of all valid allocations, exhibiting a bijection between sets of agents who can be allocated and maximum-weight matchings under carefully chosen rank-based weights. While prior work provides a polynomial-time algorithm to locate a valid allocation, our characterization admits a simpler algorithm that enables two wide-reaching extensions: 1. Selecting valid allocations that satisfy additional criteria: Via three examples -- inclusion/exclusion of some chosen agent; agent-side Pareto efficiency vs. welfare maximization; and fairness from the perspective of allocated vs. unallocated agents -- we show that finding priority-respecting allocations subject to some secondary constraint straddles a complexity knife-edge; in each example, one problem variant can be solved efficiently, while its variant is NP-hard. 2. Efficiency-envy tradeoffs in dynamic allocation: In settings where allocations must be made to T agents arriving sequentially via some stochastic process, we show that while insisting on zero priority violations leads to an Omega(T) loss in efficiency, one can design allocation policies ensuring that the sum of the efficiency loss and priority violations in hindsight is O(1).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Fair Price Discrimination

A seller is pricing identical copies of a good to a stream of unit-demand buyers. Each buyer has a value on the good as his private information. The seller only knows the empirical value distribution of the buyer population and chooses the revenue-optimal price. We consider a widely studied third-degree price discrimination model where an information intermediary with perfect knowledge of the arriving buyer's value sends a signal to the seller, hence changing the seller's posterior and inducing the seller to set a personalized posted price. Prior work of Bergemann, Brooks, and Morris (American Economic Review, 2015) has shown the existence of a signaling scheme that preserves seller revenue, while always selling the item, hence maximizing consumer surplus. In a departure from prior work, we ask whether the consumer surplus generated is fairly distributed among buyers with different values. To this end, we aim to maximize welfare functions that reward more balanced surplus allocations. Our main result is the surprising existence of a novel signaling scheme that simultaneously $8$-approximates all welfare functions that are non-negative, monotonically increasing, symmetric, and concave, compared with any other signaling scheme. Classical examples of such welfare functions include the utilitarian social welfare, the Nash welfare, and the max-min welfare. Such a guarantee cannot be given by any consumer-surplus-maximizing scheme -- which are the ones typically studied in the literature. In addition, our scheme is socially efficient, and has the fairness property that buyers with higher values enjoy higher expected surplus, which is not always the case for existing schemes.

cs.GT↗