Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Silas Cato Sacher

Publications and source records attributed to Silas Cato Sacher.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Language-Representability: Possibilities and Limitations

The study of word-representability was initiated by the seminal work of Kitaev and Pyatkin in 2008 that has later led to the monograph by Kitaev and Lozin in 2015. In this paper, we build on the very recent work by Fernau et al. who proposed a general framework that generalizes certain aspects of word-representability, so that any binary language describes a graph class. In this work, we systematically study particularly small languages and observe that they characterize well-known graph classes, e.g., interval, permutation, circle, and bipartite chain graphs. Thus, we strengthen the bond between formal languages and graph classes, even for small binary languages. We also show some limitations of our approach by proving that, e.g., families of sparse graphs like planar graphs cannot be characterized by any language following this approach.

cs.FL↗

$2$-word-$π$-representable Graphs

This paper investigates the new notion of $2$-word-$π$-repre\-sentable graphs: the nodes of the graph correspond to the letters of the two words and there exists an edge between two nodes if the projections of any two letters of both words are equal. The benefit of not only using one word for a representation as introduced by Kitaev and Pyatkin is that every graph is $2$-word-$π$-representable. We present an algorithm that returns two representing words for any graph. Aside, we show that every permutation graph is representable by two $1$-uniform words and give constructions how graph operations on $2$-word-$π$-representable graphs can be realised on their representing words which give further insights into the representation of cographs.

math.CO↗

Towards Settling the Complexity of the Lettericity Problem

The lettericity of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is defined as the smallest size of an alphabet $Σ$ such that there is a word $w_1 \dots w_{|V|} \in Σ^*$ and a decoder $\mathcal{D} \subseteq Σ^2$ with the property that $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $G(\mathcal{D}, w)$, that is, the graph with vertex set $\{1, \dots, n\}$ and edge set $\{ij \mid 1\leq i < j \leq n, w_iw_j \in \mathcal{D}\}$. Note that $G(\mathcal{D}, w)$ can be seen as a graph with inherent coloring $χ\colon V(G) \rightarrow Σ$. It is unknown whether the lettericity of a given graph can be computed in polynomial time. The problem to determine the lettericity of a given graph is called the lettericity problem. As a step towards answering the complexity of this problem, we investigate the following retrieval problems: given a graph $G$ together with two of the three solution-objects (word $w$, decoder $\mathcal{D}$, and coloring $χ$), the goal is to compute the third solution-object. We show that word retrieval and decoder retrieval are solvable in polynomial time, while coloring retrieval is equivalent to the graph isomorphism problem. Beyond this, we introduce symmetric lettericity which is a restricted version of lettericity where each decoder needs to be symmetrical ($ab\in \mathcal{D}$ if and only if $ba\in \mathcal{D}$). As we show, the symmetric lettericity of a graph always equals the neighborhood diversity of the graph, which in fact can be computed in linear time.

cs.DS↗

On Languages Describing Large Graph Classes

In this work, we introduce a new notion for representing graph classes with formal languages. In contrast to the seminal work by Kitaev and Pyatkin to represent graphs by words, we use formal binary languages in order to have a set of patterns (given by the languages' words) defining the edges in the graph. In particular, we investigate famous languages like the palindromes, copy-words, Lyndon words, and Dyck words to represent all graphs or specific graph classes by restricting these languages.

cs.FL↗

Determining Factorial Speed Fast

The speed of a graph class $\cal G$ measures how many labeled graphs on $n$ vertices one can find in $\cal G$. This graph class complexity function is explicitly provided on graphclasses.org. However, for many graph classes, their speed status is classified as \emph{unknown}. In this paper, w}\shortversion{W}e show that any graph class representable by a finite binary language has at most factorial speed, meaning that its speed function behaves like $2^{Θ(n\log n)}$, and we use this criterion to classify many graph classes whose speed was previously unknown as factorial. As a consequence, inclusions between several graph classes can now be seen to be proper. We also prove that $k$-letter graphs have exponential speed, i.e., the speed function lies in $2^{Θ(n)}$.

cs.DM↗

Arithmetic Circuits with Division

We study the computational complexity of the membership problem for arithmetic circuits over natural numbers with division. We consider different subsets of the operations {intersection,union,complement,+,x,/}, where / is the element-wise integer division (without remainder and without rounding). Results for the subsets without division have been studied before, in particular by McKenzie and Wagner and Yang. The division is expressive because it makes it possible to describe the set of factors of a given number as a circuit. Surprisingly, the cases {intersection,union,complement,+,/} and {intersection,union,complement,x,/} are PSPACE-complete and therefore equivalent to the corresponding cases without division. The case {union,/} is NP-hard in contrast to the case {union} which is NL-complete. Further upper bounds, lower bounds and completeness results are given.

cs.CC↗

Generalized Word-Representable Graphs

The literature on word-representable graphs is quite rich, and a number of variations of the original definition have been proposed over the years. We are initiating a systematic study of such variations based on formal languages. In our framework, we can associate a graph class to each language over the binary alphabet \{0,1\}. All graph classes that are language-representable in this sense are hereditary and enjoy further common properties. Besides word-representable graphs and, more generally, 1^k- or k-11-representable graphs, we can identify many more graph classes in our framework, like (co)bipartite graphs, (co)comparability graphs, to name a few. It was already known that any graph is 111- or 2-11-representable. When such representations are considered for storing graphs, 111- or 2-11-representability bears the disadvantage of being significantly inferior to standard adjacency matrices or lists. We prove that quite famous languages like the palindromes, the copy language or the Lyndon words can match the efficiency of standard graph representations. The perspective of language theory allows us to prove general results that hold for all graph classes that can be defined in this way. This includes certain closure properties (e.g., all language-definable graph classes are hereditary) as well as certain limitations (e.g., all language-representable graph classes contain graphs of arbitrarily large treewidth and of arbitrarily large degeneracy, except a trivial case). As each language describes a graph class, we can also ask decidability questions concerning graph classes, given a concrete presentation of a formal language. We also present a systematic study of graph classes that can be represented by languages in which each letter occurs at most twice. Here, we find graph classes like interval, permutation, circle, bipartite chain, convex, and threshold graphs.

cs.DM↗