Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Simeon C. Calvert

Publications and source records attributed to Simeon C. Calvert.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Artificial Intelligence for Modeling and Simulation of Mixed Automated and Human Traffic

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are now operating on public roads, which makes their testing and validation more critical than ever. Simulation offers a safe and controlled environment for evaluating AV performance in varied conditions. However, existing simulation tools mainly focus on graphical realism and rely on simple rule-based models and therefore fail to accurately represent the complexity of driving behaviors and interactions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown strong potential to address these limitations; however, despite the rapid progress across AI methodologies, a comprehensive survey of their application to mixed autonomy traffic simulation remains lacking. Existing surveys either focus on simulation tools without examining the AI methods behind them, or cover ego-centric decision-making without addressing the broader challenge of modeling surrounding traffic. Moreover, they do not offer a unified taxonomy of AI methods covering individual behavior modeling to full scene simulation. To address these gaps, this survey provides a structured review and synthesis of AI methods for modeling AV and human driving behavior in mixed autonomy traffic simulation. We introduce a taxonomy that organizes methods into three families: agent-level behavior models, environment-level simulation methods, and cognitive and physics-informed methods. The survey analyzes how existing simulation platforms fall short of the needs of mixed autonomy research and outlines directions to narrow this gap. It also provides a chronological overview of AI methods and reviews evaluation protocols and metrics, simulation tools, and datasets. By covering both traffic engineering and computer science perspectives, we aim to bridge the gap between these two communities.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2025

Adaptive Time Budgets for Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transition in Conditionally Automated Driving

Conditionally automated driving requires drivers to resume vehicle control promptly when automation reaches its operational limits. Ensuring smooth vehicle control transitions is critical for the safety and efficiency of mixed-traffic transportation systems, where complex interactions and variable traffic behaviors pose additional challenges. This study addresses this challenge by introducing an adaptive time budget framework that provides drivers with sufficient time to complete takeovers both safely and comfortably across diverse scenarios. We focus in particular on the takeover buffer, that is, the extra time available after drivers consciously resume control to complete evasive maneuvers. A driving simulator experiment is conducted to evaluate the influence of different takeover buffer lengths on safety-related indicators (minimum time-to-collision, maximum deceleration, and steering wheel angle) and subjective assessments (perceived time sufficiency, perceived risk, and performance satisfaction). Results show that (i) takeover buffers of about 5-6 seconds consistently lead to optimal safety and comfort; and (ii) drivers prefer relatively stable takeover buffers across varying traffic densities and n-back tasks. This study introduces an adaptive time budget framework that dynamically allocates transition time by incorporating a predicted takeover time and a preferred takeover buffer (piecewise function). This can serve as an important first step toward providing drivers with sufficient time to resume vehicle control across diverse scenarios, which needs to be validated in more diverse and real-world driving contexts. By aligning the provided time budget with driver needs under specific circumstances, the adaptive framework can improve reliability of control transitions, facilitate human-centered automated driving, reduce crash risk, and maintain overall traffic efficiency.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2025

Decentralized Modeling of Vehicular Maneuvers and Interactions at Urban Junctions

Modeling and evaluation of automated vehicles (AVs) in mixed-autonomy traffic is essential prior to their safe and efficient deployment. This is especially important at urban junctions where complex multi-agent interactions occur. Current approaches for modeling vehicular maneuvers and interactions at urban junctions have limitations in formulating non-cooperative interactions and vehicle dynamics within a unified mathematical framework. Previous studies either assume predefined paths or rely on cooperation and central controllability, limiting their realism and applicability in mixed-autonomy traffic. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a modeling framework for trajectory planning and decentralized vehicular control at urban junctions. The framework employs a bi-level structure where the upper level generates kinematically feasible reference trajectories using an efficient graph search algorithm with a custom heuristic function, while the lower level employs a predictive controller for trajectory tracking and optimization. Unlike existing approaches, our framework does not require central controllability or knowledge sharing among vehicles. The vehicle kinematics are explicitly incorporated at both levels, and acceleration and steering angle are used as control variables. This intuitive formulation facilitates analysis of traffic efficiency, environmental impacts, and motion comfort. The framework's decentralized structure accommodates operational and stochastic elements, such as vehicles' detection range, perception uncertainties, and reaction delay, making the model suitable for safety analysis. Numerical and simulation experiments across diverse scenarios demonstrate the framework's capability in modeling accurate and realistic vehicular maneuvers and interactions at various urban junctions, including unsignalized intersections and roundabouts.

math.OC↗
arXiv2025

Multidimensional Assessment of Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

When automated driving systems encounter complex situations beyond their operational capabilities, they issue takeover requests, prompting drivers to resume vehicle control and return to the driving loop as a critical safety backup. However, this control transition places significant demands on drivers, requiring them to promptly respond to takeover requests while executing high-quality interventions. To ensure safe and comfortable control transitions, it is essential to develop a deep understanding of the key factors influencing various takeover performance aspects. This study evaluates drivers' takeover performance across three dimensions: response efficiency, user experience, and driving safety - using a driving simulator experiment. EXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models are used to investigate the contributions of two critical factors, i.e., Situational Awareness (SA) and Spare Capacity (SC), in predicting various takeover performance metrics by comparing the predictive results to the baseline models that rely solely on basic Driver Characteristics (DC). The results reveal that (i) higher SA enables drivers to respond to takeover requests more quickly, particularly for reflexive responses; and (ii) SC shows a greater overall impact on takeover quality than SA, where higher SC generally leads to enhanced subjective rating scores and objective execution trajectories. These findings highlight the distinct yet complementary roles of SA and SC in shaping performance components, offering valuable insights for optimizing human-vehicle interactions and enhancing automated driving system design.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2025

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Performance

Conditionally automated driving systems require human drivers to disengage from non-driving-related activities and resume vehicle control within limited time budgets when encountering scenarios beyond system capabilities. Ensuring safe and comfortable transitions is critical for reducing driving risks and improving user experience. However, takeovers involve complex human-vehicle interactions, resulting in substantial variability in drivers' responses, especially in takeover time, defined as the duration needed to regain control. This variability presents challenges in setting sufficient time budgets that are neither too short (risking safety and comfort) nor too long (reducing driver alertness and transition efficiency). Although previous research has examined the role of time budgets in influencing takeover time and performance, few studies have systematically addressed how to determine sufficient time budgets that adapt to diverse scenarios and driver needs. This review supports such efforts by examining the entire takeover sequence, including takeover time, time budget, and takeover performance. Specifically, we (i) synthesize causal factors influencing takeover time and propose a taxonomy of its determinants using the task-capability interface model; (ii) review existing work on fixed and adaptive time budgets, introducing the concept of the takeover buffer to describe the gap between takeover time and allocated time budget; (iii) present a second taxonomy to support standardized and context-sensitive measurement of takeover performance; (iv) propose a conceptual model describing the relationships among takeover time, time budget, and performance; and (v) outline a research agenda with six directions.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2025

Learning collision risk proactively from naturalistic driving data at scale

Accurately and proactively alerting drivers or automated systems to emerging collisions is crucial for road safety, particularly in highly interactive and complex urban environments. Existing methods either require labour-intensive annotation of sparse risk, struggle to consider varying contextual factors, or are tailored to limited scenarios. Here we present the Generalised Surrogate Safety Measure (GSSM), a data-driven approach that learns collision risk from naturalistic driving without the need for crash or risk labels. Trained over multiple datasets and evaluated on 2,591 real-world crashes and near-crashes, a basic GSSM using only instantaneous motion kinematics achieves an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.9, and secures a median time advance of 2.6 seconds to prevent potential collisions. Incorporating additional interaction patterns and contextual factors provides further performance gains. Across interaction scenarios such as rear-end, merging, and turning, GSSM consistently outperforms existing baselines in accuracy and timeliness. These results establish GSSM as a scalable, context-aware, and generalisable foundation to identify risky interactions before they become unavoidable, supporting proactive safety in autonomous driving systems and traffic incident management. Code and experiment data are openly accessible at https://github.com/Yiru-Jiao/GSSM.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2025

Principles and Framework for the Operationalisation of Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems

This paper proposes an alignment for the operationalisation of Meaningful Human Control (MHC) for autonomous systems by proposing operational principles for MHC and introducing a generic framework for its application. With a plethora of different seemingly diverging expansions for use of MHC in practice, this work aims to bring alignment and convergence use in practice. The increasing integration of autonomous systems in various domains emphasises a critical need to maintain human control to ensure responsible safety, accountability, and ethical operation of these systems. The concept of MHC offers an ideal concept for the design and evaluation of human control over autonomous systems, while considering human and technology capabilities. Through analysis of existing literature and investigation across various domains and related concepts, principles for the operationalisation of MHC are set out to provide tangible guidelines for researchers and practitioners aiming to implement MHC in their systems. The proposed framework dissects generic components of systems and their subsystems aligned with different agents, stakeholders and processes at different levels of proximity to an autonomous technology. The framework is domain-agnostic, emphasizing the universal applicability of the MHC principles irrespective of the technological context, paving the way for safer and more responsible autonomous systems.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2024

A Unified Probabilistic Approach to Traffic Conflict Detection

Traffic conflict detection is essential for proactive road safety by identifying potential collisions before they occur. Existing methods rely on surrogate safety measures tailored to specific interactions (e.g., car-following, side-swiping, or path-crossing) and require varying thresholds in different traffic conditions. This variation leads to inconsistencies and limited adaptability of conflict detection in evolving traffic environments. Consequently, a need persists for consistent detection of traffic conflicts across interaction contexts. To address this need, this study proposes a unified probabilistic approach. The proposed approach establishes a unified framework of traffic conflict detection, where traffic conflicts are formulated as context-dependent extreme events of road user interactions. The detection of conflicts is then decomposed into a series of statistical learning tasks: representing interaction contexts, inferring proximity distributions, and assessing extreme collision risk. The unified formulation accommodates diverse hypotheses of traffic conflicts and the learning tasks enable data-driven analysis of factors such as motion states of road users, environment conditions, and participant characteristics. Jointly, this approach supports consistent and comprehensive evaluation of the collision risk emerging in road user interactions. Our experiments using real-world trajectory data show that the approach provides effective collision warnings, generalises across distinct datasets and traffic environments, covers a broad range of conflict types, and captures a long-tailed distribution of conflict intensity. The findings highlight its potential to enhance the safety assessment of traffic infrastructures and policies, improve collision warning systems for autonomous driving, and deepen the understanding of road user behaviour in safety-critical interactions.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2024

Automated Vehicles at Unsignalized Intersections: Safety and Efficiency Implications of Mixed Human and Automated Traffic

The integration of automated vehicles (AVs) into transportation systems presents an unprecedented opportunity to enhance road safety and efficiency. However, understanding the interactions between AVs and human-driven vehicles (HVs) at intersections remains an open research question. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining behavioral differences and adaptations of AVs and HVs at unsignalized intersections by utilizing two large-scale AV datasets from Waymo and Lyft. By using a systematic methodology, the research identifies and analyzes merging and crossing conflicts by calculating key safety and efficiency metrics, including time to collision (TTC), post-encroachment time (PET), maximum required deceleration (MRD), time advantage (TA), and speed and acceleration profiles. Through this approach, the study assesses the safety and efficiency implications of these behavioral differences and adaptations for mixed-autonomy traffic. The findings reveal a paradox: while AVs maintain larger safety margins, their conservative behavior can lead to unexpected situations for human drivers, potentially causing unsafe conditions. From a performance point of view, human drivers tend to exhibit more consistent behavior when interacting with AVs versus other HVs, suggesting AVs may contribute to harmonizing traffic flow patterns. Moreover, notable differences were observed between Waymo and Lyft vehicles, which highlights the importance of considering manufacturer-specific AV behaviors in traffic modeling and management strategies for the safe integration of AVs. The processed dataset, as well as the developed algorithms and scripts, are openly published to foster research on AV-HV interactions.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2024

Edge Case Detection in Automated Driving: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions

Automated vehicles (AVs) promise to enhance transportation safety and efficiency. However, ensuring their reliability in real-world conditions remains challenging, particularly due to rare and unexpected situations known as edge cases. While numerous approaches exist for detecting edge cases, a comprehensive survey reviewing these techniques is lacking. This paper bridges this gap by presenting a hierarchical review and systematic classification of edge case detection and assessment methodologies. Our classification is structured on two levels: first, by AV modules, including perception and trajectory-related (encompassing prediction, planning, and control) subsystems; and second, by underlying methodologies and theories guiding these techniques. Furthermore, we introduce "knowledge-driven" approaches, which complement data-driven methods by leveraging expert insights and domain knowledge to identify cases absent in training datasets. We then examine techniques and metrics for evaluating edge case detection methods, including detection performance, practical deployment (e.g., computational overhead), and domain-specific measures (e.g., crash rates and severity analysis). We conclude by highlighting key challenges for edge case detection, including data availability and quality issues, validation and interpretability limitations, the simulation-to-real gap, and computational constraints. The hierarchical classification and review of methods and assessment techniques in this survey enable modular and targeted testing frameworks by guiding the selection of detection methods for specific AV subsystems while considering methodological principles. It also supports practical testing by facilitating scenario generation in simulation and focused subsystem validation in the real world.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2024

A data-driven approach for safety quantification of non-linear stochastic systems with unknown additive noise distribution

In this paper, we present a novel data-driven approach to quantify safety for non-linear, discrete-time stochastic systems with unknown noise distribution. We define safety as the probability that the system remains in a given region of the state space for a given time horizon and, to quantify it, we present an approach based on Stochastic Barrier Functions (SBFs). In particular, we introduce an inner approximation of the stochastic program to design a SBF in terms of a chance-constrained optimisation problem, which allows us to leverage the scenario approach theory to design a SBF from samples of the system with Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) guarantees. Our approach leads to tractable, robust linear programs, which enable us to assert safety for non-linear models that were otherwise deemed infeasible with existing methods. To further mitigate the computational complexity of our approach, we exploit the structure of the system dynamics and rely on spatial data structures to accelerate the construction and solution of the underlying optimisation problem. We show the efficacy and validity of our framework in several benchmarks, showing that our approach can obtain substantially tighter certificates compared to state-of-the-art with a confidence that is several orders of magnitude higher.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2024

Driving pattern interpretation based on action phases clustering

Current approaches to identifying driving heterogeneity face challenges in comprehending fundamental patterns from the perspective of underlying driving behavior mechanisms. The concept of Action phases was proposed in our previous work, capturing the diversity of driving characteristics with physical meanings. This study presents a novel framework to further interpret driving patterns by classifying Action phases in an unsupervised manner. In this framework, a Resampling and Downsampling Method (RDM) is first applied to standardize the length of Action phases. Then the clustering calibration procedure including ''Feature Selection'', ''Clustering Analysis'', ''Difference/Similarity Evaluation'', and ''Action phases Re-extraction'' is iteratively applied until all differences among clusters and similarities within clusters reach the pre-determined criteria. Application of the framework using real-world datasets revealed six driving patterns in the I80 dataset, labeled as ''Catch up'', ''Keep away'', and ''Maintain distance'', with both ''Stable'' and ''Unstable'' states. Notably, Unstable patterns are more numerous than Stable ones. ''Maintain distance'' is the most common among Stable patterns. These observations align with the dynamic nature of driving. Two patterns ''Stable keep away'' and ''Unstable catch up'' are missing in the US101 dataset, which is in line with our expectations as this dataset was previously shown to have less heterogeneity. This demonstrates the potential of driving patterns in describing driving heterogeneity. The proposed framework promises advantages in addressing label scarcity in supervised learning and enhancing tasks such as driving behavior modeling and driving trajectory prediction.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2024

Performance Comparison of Deep RL Algorithms for Mixed Traffic Cooperative Lane-Changing

Lane-changing (LC) is a challenging scenario for connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) because of the complex dynamics and high uncertainty of the traffic environment. This challenge can be handled by deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches, leveraging their data-driven and model-free nature. Our previous work proposed a cooperative lane-changing in mixed traffic (CLCMT) mechanism based on TD3 to facilitate an optimal lane-changing strategy. This study enhances the current CLCMT mechanism by considering both the uncertainty of the human-driven vehicles (HVs) and the microscopic interactions between HVs and CAVs. The state-of-the-art (SOTA) DRL algorithms including DDPG, TD3, SAC, and PPO are utilized to deal with the formulated MDP with continuous actions. Performance comparison among the four DRL algorithms demonstrates that DDPG, TD3, and PPO algorithms can deal with uncertainty in traffic environments and learn well-performed LC strategies in terms of safety, efficiency, comfort, and ecology. The PPO algorithm outperforms the other three algorithms, regarding a higher reward, fewer exploration mistakes and crashes, and a more comfortable and ecology LC strategy. The improvements promise CLCMT mechanism greater advantages in the LC motion planning of CAVs.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2024

A Meaningful Human Control Perspective on User Perception of Partially Automated Driving Systems: A Case Study of Tesla Users

The use of partially automated driving systems raises concerns about potential responsibility issues, posing risk to the system safety, acceptance, and adoption of these technologies. The concept of meaningful human control has emerged in response to the responsibility gap problem, requiring the fulfillment of two conditions, tracking and tracing. While this concept has provided important philosophical and design insights on automated driving systems, there is currently little knowledge on how meaningful human control relates to subjective experiences of actual users of these systems. To address this gap, our study aimed to investigate the alignment between the degree of meaningful human control and drivers' perceptions of safety and trust in a real-world partially automated driving system. We utilized previously collected data from interviews with Tesla "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) Beta users, investigating the alignment between the user perception and how well the system was tracking the users' reasons. We found that tracking of users' reasons for driving tasks (such as safe maneuvers) correlated with perceived safety and trust, albeit with notable exceptions. Surprisingly, failure to track lane changing and braking reasons was not necessarily associated with negative perceptions of safety. However, the failure of the system to track expected maneuvers in dangerous situations always resulted in low trust and perceived lack of safety. Overall, our analyses highlight alignment points but also possible discrepancies between perceived safety and trust on the one hand, and meaningful human control on the other hand. Our results can help the developers of automated driving technology to design systems under meaningful human control and are perceived as safe and trustworthy.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2023

A Conflict Resolution Dataset Derived from Argoverse-2: Analysis of the Safety and Efficiency Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles at Intersections

As the deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in mixed traffic flow becomes increasingly prevalent, ensuring safe and smooth interactions between AVs and human agents is of critical importance. How road users resolve conflicts at intersections has significant impacts on driving safety and traffic efficiency. These impacts depend on both the behaviours of AVs and humans' reactions to the presence of AVs. Therefore, using real-world data to assess and compare the safety and efficiency measures of AV-involved and AV-free scenarios is crucial. To this end, this paper presents a high-quality conflict resolution dataset derived from the open Argoverse-2 motion forecasting data to analyse the safety and efficiency impacts of AVs. The contribution is twofold: First, we propose and apply a specific data processing pipeline to select scenarios of interest, rectify data errors, and enhance the raw data in Argoverse-2. As a result, 5000+ cases where an AV resolves conflict with a human road user and 16000+ conflict resolution cases without AVs are obtained. Motion data is smooth and consistent in these cases. This open dataset comprises diverse and balanced conflict resolution regimes. Second, this paper employs surrogate safety measures and a novel efficiency measure to assess the impact of AVs at intersections. The results suggest that human drivers exhibit similar safety and efficiency performances when interacting with AVs and with other human drivers. In contrast, pedestrians demonstrate more diverse reactions. Furthermore, due to the safety-prior strategy of AVs, the average efficiency of AV-involved conflict resolution decreases by 8.6% compared to AV-free cases. This informative dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers and the findings give insights into the possible impacts of AVs. The dataset is openly available via https://github.com/RomainLITUD/conflict_resolution_dataset.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2023

Pattern retrieval of traffic congestion using graph-based associations of traffic domain-specific features

The fast-growing amount of traffic data brings many opportunities for revealing more insightful information about traffic dynamics. However, it also demands an effective database management system in which information retrieval is arguably an important feature. The ability to locate similar patterns in big datasets potentially paves the way for further valuable analyses in traffic management. This paper proposes a content-based retrieval system for spatiotemporal patterns of highway traffic congestion. There are two main components in our framework, namely pattern representation and similarity measurement. To effectively interpret retrieval outcomes, the paper proposes a graph-based approach (relation-graph) for the former component, in which fundamental traffic phenomena are encoded as nodes and their spatiotemporal relationships as edges. In the latter component, the similarities between congestion patterns are customizable with various aspects according to user expectations. We evaluated the proposed framework by applying it to a dataset of hundreds of patterns with various complexities (temporally and spatially). The example queries indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method, i.e. the obtained patterns present similar traffic phenomena as in the given examples. In addition, the success of the proposed approach directly derives a new opportunity for semantic retrieval, in which expected patterns are described by adopting the relation-graph notion to associate fundamental traffic phenomena.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2023

Large Car-following Data Based on Lyft level-5 Open Dataset: Following Autonomous Vehicles vs. Human-driven Vehicles

Car-Following (CF), as a fundamental driving behaviour, has significant influences on the safety and efficiency of traffic flow. Investigating how human drivers react differently when following autonomous vs. human-driven vehicles (HV) is thus critical for mixed traffic flow. Research in this field can be expedited with trajectory datasets collected by Autonomous Vehicles (AVs). However, trajectories collected by AVs are noisy and not readily applicable for studying CF behaviour. This paper extracts and enhances two categories of CF data, HV-following-AV (H-A) and HV-following-HV (H-H), from the open Lyft level-5 dataset. First, CF pairs are selected based on specific rules. Next, the quality of raw data is assessed by anomaly analysis. Then, the raw CF data is corrected and enhanced via motion planning, Kalman filtering, and wavelet denoising. As a result, 29k+ H-A and 42k+ H-H car-following segments are obtained, with a total driving distance of 150k+ km. A diversity assessment shows that the processed data cover complete CF regimes for calibrating CF models. This open and ready-to-use dataset provides the opportunity to investigate the CF behaviours of following AVs vs. HVs from real-world data. It can further facilitate studies on exploring the impact of AVs on mixed urban traffic.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2023

Inner approximations of stochastic programs for data-driven stochastic barrier function design

This paper proposes a new framework to compute finite-horizon safety guarantees for discrete-time piece-wise affine systems with stochastic noise of unknown distributions. The approach is based on a novel approach to synthesise a stochastic barrier function (SBF) from noisy data and rely on the scenario optimization theory. In particular, we show that the stochastic program to synthesize a SBF can be relaxed into a chance-constrained optimisation problem on which scenario approach theory applies. We further show that the resulting program can be reduced to a linear programming problem, thus guaranteeing efficiency. In contrast to existing approaches, this method is data efficient as it only requires the number of data to be proportional to the logarithm in the negative inverse of the confidence level and is computationally efficient due to its reduction to linear programming. The efficacy of the method is empirically evaluated on various verification benchmarks. Experiments show a significant improvement with respect to state-of-the-art, obtaining tighter certificates with a confidence that is several orders of magnitude higher.

eess.SY↗