arXiv subjects

Simon Oddershede Gregersen

Publications and source records attributed to Simon Oddershede Gregersen.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Building Extensible Program Logics through Effect Handlers

One strategy for reasoning about programs that have certain kinds of effects is to use program logics that provide specialized rules for reasoning about these effects. However, developing program logics requires skills that are distinct from those needed for using program logics, making the development of new logics challenging and less accessible. Moreover, when developing new logics, it can be difficult to reuse components from prior logics or combine support for different effects. In this paper, we propose an approach for operationally building extensible program logics based on effect handlers. Our starting point is an expressive program logic for reasoning about programs written in a pure, sequential language with support for effect handlers. Within this language, we implement handlers that model concurrency, distributed execution, and crash-recovery behavior. Then, by proving properties about these handlers, we extend the program logic and derive expressive rules for reasoning about these effects. In some cases, this approach leads to stronger reasoning rules than those found in prior program logics targeting these features. In addition, we develop a relational logic for proving contextual refinements between programs using effects. As with unary reasoning, handlers enable this relational logic to be developed in an extensible way.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Completeness of Logical Atomicity for Linearizability in Concurrent Separation Logic

Linearizability is a standard correctness condition for concurrent data structures. It guarantees that operations behave as if they took effect at some atomic instant between their call and return points. Despite the central role linearizability plays, prior work has argued for instead using a style of specification that internalizes the atomicity of operations in terms of the logic's reasoning rules, known as logical atomicity. These logically atomic specifications are intended to be easier to compose inside of the logic than linearizability. Prior work has shown that in the Iris separation logic framework, a certain form of logically atomic specifications implies that a data structure is linearizable. However, the converse remained an open question: for every linearizable data structure, is it always possible to derive a corresponding logically atomic specification? This paper resolves this question in the affirmative. We prove a completeness theorem for Iris that derives a logically atomic specification for any linearizable data structure. As a consequence, we are able to embed a variety of linearizability proof techniques into Iris and use them to derive logically atomic specifications. We apply this to three linearizability proof methods: aspect-oriented linearizability proofs, forward simulations with commit points, and meta-configuration tracking. Using these embeddings, we derive logically atomic specifications for the Herlihy-Wing queue and the Baskets Queue. We furthermore establish a connection between logical atomicity and an encoding of refinement in Iris that has been used in prior logical relations models. This result allows us to transport logically atomic specifications across refinements, which we apply to the Folly MPMC queue implementation. All of the results in this paper have been mechanized in the Rocq Prover.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Modular Verification of Differential Privacy in Probabilistic Higher-Order Separation Logic (Extended Version)

Differential privacy is the standard method for privacy-preserving data analysis. The importance of having strong guarantees on the reliability of implementations of differentially private algorithms is widely recognized and has sparked fruitful research on formal methods. However, the design patterns and language features used in modern DP libraries as well as the classes of guarantees that the library designers wish to establish often fall outside of the scope of previous verification approaches. We introduce a program logic suitable for verifying differentially private implementations written in complex, general-purpose programming languages. Our logic has first-class support for reasoning about privacy budgets as a separation logic resource. The expressiveness of the logic and the target language allow our approach to handle common programming patterns used in the implementation of libraries for differential privacy, such as privacy filters and caching. While previous work has focused on developing guarantees for programs written in domain-specific languages or for privacy mechanisms in isolation, our logic can reason modularly about primitives, higher-order combinators, and interactive algorithms. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach by implementing a verified library of differential privacy mechanisms, including an online version of the Sparse Vector Technique, as well as a privacy filter inspired by the popular Python library OpenDP, which crucially relies on our ability to handle the combination of randomization, local state, and higher-order functions. We demonstrate that our specifications are general and reusable by instantiating them to verify clients of our library. All of our results have been foundationally verified in the Rocq Prover.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2025

Modular Reasoning about Error Bounds for Concurrent Probabilistic Programs (Extended Version)

We present Coneris, the first higher-order concurrent separation logic for reasoning about error probability bounds of higher-order concurrent probabilistic programs with higher-order state. To support modular reasoning about concurrent (non-probabilistic) program modules, state-of-the-art program logics internalize the classic notion of linearizability within the logic through the concept of logical atomicity. Coneris extends this idea to probabilistic concurrent program modules. Thus Coneris supports modular reasoning about probabilistic concurrent modules by capturing a novel notion of randomized logical atomicity within the logic. To do so, Coneris utilizes presampling tapes and a novel probabilistic update modality to describe how state is changed probabilistically at linearization points. We demonstrate this approach by means of smaller synthetic examples and larger case studies. All of the presented results, including the meta-theory, have been mechanized in the Rocq proof assistant and the Iris separation logic framework This is the extended version of the same paper accepted at ICFP 2025, where more details of proofs and case studies are included in the Appendix.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Logical Relations for Formally Verified Authenticated Data Structures

Authenticated data structures allow untrusted third parties to carry out operations which produce proofs that can be used to verify an operation's output. Such data structures are challenging to develop and implement correctly. This paper gives a formal proof of security and correctness for a library that generates authenticated versions of data structures automatically. The proof is based on a new relational separation logic for reasoning about programs that use collision-resistant cryptographic hash functions. This logic provides a basis for constructing two semantic models of a type system, which are used to justify how the library makes use of type abstraction to enforce security and correctness. Using these models, we also prove the correctness of several optimizations to the library and then show how optimized, hand-written implementations of authenticated data structures can be soundly linked with automatically generated code. All of the results in this paper have been mechanized in the Coq proof assistant using the Iris framework.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Approximate Relational Reasoning for Higher-Order Probabilistic Programs

Properties such as provable security and correctness for randomized programs are naturally expressed relationally as approximate equivalences. As a result, a number of relational program logics have been developed to reason about such approximate equivalences of probabilistic programs. However, existing approximate relational logics are mostly restricted to first-order programs without general state. In this paper we develop Approxis, a higher-order approximate relational separation logic for reasoning about approximate equivalence of programs written in an expressive ML-like language with discrete probabilistic sampling, higher-order functions, and higher-order state. The Approxis logic recasts the concept of error credits in the relational setting to reason about relational approximation, which allows for expressive notions of modularity and composition, a range of new approximate relational rules, and an internalization of a standard limiting argument for showing exact probabilistic equivalences by approximation. We also use Approxis to develop a logical relation model that quantifies over error credits, which can be used to prove exact contextual equivalence. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach on a range of examples, including the PRP/PRF switching lemma, IND\$-CPA security of an encryption scheme, and a collection of rejection samplers. All of the results have been mechanized in the Coq proof assistant and the Iris separation logic framework.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Error Credits: Resourceful Reasoning about Error Bounds for Higher-Order Probabilistic Programs

Probabilistic programs often trade accuracy for efficiency, and thus may, with a small probability, return an incorrect result. It is important to obtain precise bounds for the probability of these errors, but existing verification approaches have limitations that lead to error probability bounds that are excessively coarse, or only apply to first-order programs. In this paper we present Eris, a higher-order separation logic for proving error probability bounds for probabilistic programs written in an expressive higher-order language. Our key novelty is the introduction of error credits, a separation logic resource that tracks an upper bound on the probability that a program returns an erroneous result. By representing error bounds as a resource, we recover the benefits of separation logic, including compositionality, modularity, and dependency between errors and program terms, allowing for more precise specifications. Moreover, we enable novel reasoning principles such as expectation-preserving error composition, amortized error reasoning, and error induction. We illustrate the advantages of our approach by proving amortized error bounds on a range of examples, including collision probabilities in hash functions, which allow us to write more modular specifications for data structures that use them as clients. We also use our logic to prove correctness and almost-sure termination of rejection sampling algorithms. All of our results have been mechanized in the Coq proof assistant using the Iris separation logic framework and the Coquelicot real analysis library.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Tachis: Higher-Order Separation Logic with Credits for Expected Costs

We present Tachis, a higher-order separation logic to reason about the expected cost of probabilistic programs. Inspired by the uses of time credits for reasoning about the running time of deterministic programs, we introduce a novel notion of probabilistic cost credit. Probabilistic cost credits are a separation logic resource that can be used to pay for the cost of operations in programs, and that can be distributed across all possible branches of sampling instructions according to their weight, thus enabling us to reason about expected cost. The representation of cost credits as separation logic resources gives Tachis a great deal of flexibility and expressivity. In particular, it permits reasoning about amortized expected cost by storing excess credits as potential into data structures to pay for future operations. Tachis further supports a range of cost models, including running time and entropy usage. We showcase the versatility of this approach by applying our techniques to prove upper bounds on the expected cost of a variety of probabilistic algorithms and data structures, including randomized quicksort, hash tables, and meldable heaps. All of our results have been mechanized using Coq, Iris, and the Coquelicot real analysis library.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Almost-Sure Termination by Guarded Refinement

Almost-sure termination is an important correctness property for probabilistic programs, and a number of program logics have been developed for establishing it. However, these logics have mostly been developed for first-order programs written in languages with specific syntactic patterns for looping. In this paper, we consider almost-sure termination for higher-order probabilistic programs with general references. This combination of features allows for recursion and looping to be encoded through a variety of patterns. Therefore, rather than developing proof rules for reasoning about particular recursion patterns, we instead propose an approach based on proving refinement between a higher-order program and a simpler probabilistic model, in such a way that the refinement preserves termination behavior. By proving a refinement, almost-sure termination behavior of the program can then be established by analyzing the simpler model. We present this approach in the form of Caliper, a higher-order separation logic for proving termination-preserving refinements. Caliper uses probabilistic couplings to carry out relational reasoning between a program and a model. To handle the range of recursion patterns found in higher-order programs, Caliper uses guarded recursion, in particular the principle of Löb induction. A technical novelty is that Caliper does not require the use of transfinite step indexing or other technical restrictions found in prior work on guarded recursion for termination-preservation refinement. We demonstrate the flexibility of this approach by proving almost-sure termination of several examples, including first-order loop constructs, a random list generator, treaps, and a sampler for Galton-Watson trees that uses higher-order store. All the results have been mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Trillium: Higher-Order Concurrent and Distributed Separation Logic for Intensional Refinement

Expressive state-of-the-art separation logics rely on step-indexing to model semantically complex features and to support modular reasoning about imperative higher-order concurrent and distributed programs. Step-indexing comes, however, with an inherent cost: it restricts the adequacy theorem of program logics to a fairly simple class of safety properties. In this paper, we explore if and how intensional refinement is a viable methodology for strengthening higher-order concurrent (and distributed) separation logic to prove non-trivial safety and liveness properties. Specifically, we introduce Trillium, a language-agnostic separation logic framework for showing intensional refinement relations between traces of a program and a model. We instantiate Trillium with a concurrent language and develop Fairis, a concurrent separation logic, that we use to show liveness properties of concurrent programs under fair scheduling assumptions through a fair liveness-preserving refinement of a model. We also instantiate Trillium with a distributed language and obtain an extension of Aneris, a distributed separation logic, which we use to show refinement relations between distributed systems and TLA+ models.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2023

Asynchronous Probabilistic Couplings in Higher-Order Separation Logic

Probabilistic couplings are the foundation for many probabilistic relational program logics and arise when relating random sampling statements across two programs. In relational program logics, this manifests as dedicated coupling rules that, e.g., say we may reason as if two sampling statements return the same value. However, this approach fundamentally requires aligning or "synchronizing" the sampling statements of the two programs which is not always possible. In this paper, we develop Clutch, a higher-order probabilistic relational separation logic that addresses this issue by supporting asynchronous probabilistic couplings. We use Clutch to develop a logical step-indexed logical relational to reason about contextual refinement and equivalence of higher-order programs written in a rich language with higher-order local state and impredicative polymorphism. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of our approach on a number of case studies. All the results that appear in the paper have been formalized in the Coq proof assistant using the Coquelicot library and the Iris separation logic framework.

cs.LO↗