arXiv subjects

Simon Wietheger

Publications and source records attributed to Simon Wietheger.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Improved Learning with Structure: Fine-Grained Complexity of Minimum Consistent Subset

Instance selection is a vital technique for mitigating the computational bottlenecks of nearest-neighbor classification in large-scale supervised clustering. A classical theoretical formulation of this objective is the Minimum Consistent Subset (MCS) problem. While recent research has explored its complexity on unweighted graphs to uncover structural boundaries of tractability, arbitrary metric spaces are much more accurately modeled by (edge-)weighted graphs. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive fine-grained complexity map of MCS on both unweighted and weighted graphs. As our main result, we introduce a $3^{c \cdot(\mathrm{tw}+1)}\cdot n^{\mathrm{tw}+\mathcal{O}(1)}$ algorithm for $n$-vertex $c$-colored MCS instances on weighted graphs of treewidth $\mathrm{tw}$, substantially improving upon the previous state-of-the-art algorithm for unweighted MCS on trees both in terms of generality and running time. We complement this positive result with a series of lower bounds that rule out asymptotic improvements to the running time for both weighted and unweighted graphs under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Moreover, we improve the recent slightly superexponential vertex-cover based algorithm for unweighted MCS (AAAI 2026) to a single-exponential one, and rule out further improvements to subexponential running times under the ETH. Together, our results strictly delineate the algorithmic boundaries of consistent subset selection across diverse metric structures.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Clustering Permutations under the Ulam Metric: A Parameterized Complexity Study

Rank aggregation seeks a representative permutation for a collection of rankings and plays a central role in areas such as social choice, information retrieval, and computational biology. Two fundamental aggregation tasks are the center and median problems, which minimize the maximum and the total distance to the input permutations, respectively. While these problems are well understood under Kendall's tau and related distances, their parameterized complexity under the Ulam metric, an edit-distance-based metric on permutations, has remained largely unexplored. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of rank aggregation under the Ulam metric. We consider both the center and median problems, as well as their generalizations to the $k$-center and $k$-median clustering settings, parameterized by the number of centers $k$ and the distance budget $d$ (corresponding to the maximum distance for center variants and the total distance for median variants). Both problems are known to be NP-hard already for $k=1$. We show that the Ulam $k$-center problem remains NP-hard when $d=1$, but is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k + d$. Our algorithm is based on a novel local-search framework tailored to the non-local nature of Ulam distances. We complement this by proving that no polynomial kernel exists for the $k+d$ parameterization unless NP $\subseteq$ coNP/poly. For the Ulam $k$-median problem parameterized by the total distance $d$, we establish W[1]-hardness and provide an XP algorithm. We also provide a polynomial kernel for the parameter $k + d$, which in turn yields a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Fair Correlation Clustering Meets Graph Parameters

We study the generalization of Correlation Clustering which incorporates fairness constraints via the notion of fairlets. The corresponding Fair Correlation Clustering problem has been studied from several perspectives to date, but has so far lacked a detailed analysis from the parameterized complexity paradigm. We close this gap by providing tractability results for the problem under a variety of structural graph parameterizations, including treewidth, treedepth and the vertex cover number; our results lie at the very edge of tractability given the known NP-hardness of the problem on severely restricted inputs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Gateways to Tractability for Satisfiability in Pearl's Causal Hierarchy

Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) is a central framework for reasoning about probabilistic, interventional, and counterfactual statements, yet the satisfiability problem for PCH formulas is computationally intractable in almost all classical settings. We revisit this challenge through the lens of parameterized complexity and identify the first gateways to tractability. Our results include fixed-parameter and XP-algorithms for satisfiability in key probabilistic and counterfactual fragments, using parameters such as primal treewidth and the number of variables, together with matching hardness results that map the limits of tractability. Technically, we depart from the dynamic programming paradigm typically employed for treewidth-based algorithms and instead exploit structural characterizations of well-formed causal models, providing a new algorithmic toolkit for causal reasoning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Matrix Editing Meets Fair Clustering: Parameterized Algorithms and Complexity

We study the computational problem of computing a fair means clustering of discrete vectors, which admits an equivalent formulation as editing a colored matrix into one with few distinct color-balanced rows by changing at most $k$ values. While NP-hard in both the fairness-oblivious and the fair settings, the problem is well-known to admit a fixed-parameter algorithm in the former ``vanilla'' setting. As our first contribution, we exclude an analogous algorithm even for highly restricted fair means clustering instances. We then proceed to obtain a full complexity landscape of the problem, and establish tractability results which capture three means of circumventing our obtained lower bound: placing additional constraints on the problem instances, fixed-parameter approximation, or using an alternative parameterization targeting tree-like matrices.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Speeding Up the NSGA-II via Dynamic Population Sizes

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are among the most widely and successfully applied optimizers for multi-objective problems. However, to store many optimal trade-offs (the Pareto optima) simultaneously, MOEAs are typically run with a large population of solution candidates. This slows down the algorithm and renders the choice of the population size a crucial design decision. In this work, we aim to overcome these difficulties by proposing the dynamic NSGA-II, a variant of the well-known NSGA-II that starts with a small initial population and doubles it after a user-specified number $\tau$ of function evaluations, up to a maximum size of $N_{max}$. We prove that the dynamic NSGA-II with optimal parameters computes the Pareto front of the OneMinMax benchmark of size $n$ with high probability in $O(n \log^2 n)$ function evaluations, which is considerably faster than the $\Theta(n^2 \log n)$ runtime of the static NSGA-II with optimal parameters. For the OneJumpZeroJump benchmark with gap size $k$, we show a runtime of $O(n^k \log^2 n)$, improving upon the known runtime of $\Theta(n^{k+1})$. We also propose a variant that uses the initial population size for a longer period and achieves slightly better performance. Finally, we show that a simple concurrent-run strategy turns our dynamic NSGA-II variants into parameter-less algorithms that exceed the above runtimes only by a logarithmic factor and hence still outperform the static NSGA-II by a factor of $\tilde\Omega(n)$.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2025

Near-Tight Runtime Guarantees for Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

Despite significant progress in the field of mathematical runtime analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), the performance of MOEAs on discrete many-objective problems is little understood. In particular, the few existing performance guarantees for classic MOEAs on classic benchmarks are all roughly quadratic in the size of the Pareto front. In this work, we consider a large class of MOEAs including the (global) SEMO, SMS-EMOA, balanced NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and SPEA2. For these, we prove near-tight runtime guarantees for the four most common benchmark problems OneMinMax, CountingOnesCountingZeros, LeadingOnesTrailingZeros, and OneJumpZeroJump, and this for arbitrary numbers of objectives. Most of our bounds depend only linearly on the size of the largest incomparable set, showing that MOEAs on these benchmarks cope much better with many objectives than what previous works suggested. Most of our bounds are tight apart from small polynomial factors in the number of objectives and length of bitstrings. This is the first time that such tight bounds are proven for many-objective uses of MOEAs. For the runtime of the SEMO on the LOTZ benchmark in $m \ge 6$ objectives, our runtime guarantees are even smaller than the size of the largest incomparable set. This is again the first time that such runtime guarantees are proven.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2025

A Structural Complexity Analysis of Hierarchical Task Network Planning

We perform a refined complexity-theoretic analysis of three classical problems in the context of Hierarchical Task Network Planning: the verification of a provided plan, whether an executable plan exists, and whether a given state can be reached. Our focus lies on identifying structural properties which yield tractability. We obtain new polynomial algorithms for all three problems on a natural class of primitive networks, along with corresponding lower bounds. We also obtain an algorithmic meta-theorem for lifting polynomial-time solvability from primitive to general task networks, and prove that its preconditions are tight. Finally, we analyze the parameterized complexity of the three problems.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Complexity of Efficient Sortation

A crucial challenge arising in the design of large-scale logistical networks is to optimize parcel sortation for routing. We study this problem under the recent graph-theoretic formalization of Van Dyk, Klause, Koenemann and Megow (IPCO 2024). The problem asks - given an input digraph D (the fulfillment network) together with a set of commodities represented as source-sink tuples - for a minimum-outdegree subgraph H of the transitive closure of D that contains a source-sink route for each of the commodities. Given the underlying motivation, we study two variants of the problem which differ in whether the routes for the commodities are assumed to be given, or can be chosen arbitrarily. We perform a thorough parameterized analysis of the complexity of both problems. Our results concentrate on three fundamental parameterizations of the problem: (1) When attempting to parameterize by the target outdegree of H, we show that the problems are paraNP-hard even in highly restricted cases; (2) When parameterizing by the number of commodities, we utilize Ramsey-type arguments and color-coding techniques to obtain parameterized algorithms for both problems; (3) When parameterizing by the structure of D, we establish fixed-parameter tractability for both problems w.r.t. treewidth, maximum degree and the maximum routing length. We combine this with lower bounds which show that omitting any of the three parameters results in paraNP-hardness.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

A Mathematical Runtime Analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III)

The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is the most prominent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for real-world applications. While it performs evidently well on bi-objective optimization problems, empirical studies suggest that it is less effective when applied to problems with more than two objectives. A recent mathematical runtime analysis confirmed this observation by proving the NGSA-II for an exponential number of iterations misses a constant factor of the Pareto front of the simple 3-objective OneMinMax problem. In this work, we provide the first mathematical runtime analysis of the NSGA-III, a refinement of the NSGA-II aimed at better handling more than two objectives. We prove that the NSGA-III with sufficiently many reference points -- a small constant factor more than the size of the Pareto front, as suggested for this algorithm -- computes the complete Pareto front of the 3-objective OneMinMax benchmark in an expected number of O(n log n) iterations. This result holds for all population sizes (that are at least the size of the Pareto front). It shows a drastic advantage of the NSGA-III over the NSGA-II on this benchmark. The mathematical arguments used here and in previous work on the NSGA-II suggest that similar findings are likely for other benchmarks with three or more objectives.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2023

The First Proven Performance Guarantees for the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) on a Combinatorial Optimization Problem

The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is one of the most prominent algorithms to solve multi-objective optimization problems. Recently, the first mathematical runtime guarantees have been obtained for this algorithm, however only for synthetic benchmark problems. In this work, we give the first proven performance guarantees for a classic optimization problem, the NP-complete bi-objective minimum spanning tree problem. More specifically, we show that the NSGA-II with population size $N \ge 4((n-1) w_{\max} + 1)$ computes all extremal points of the Pareto front in an expected number of $O(m^2 n w_{\max} \log(n w_{\max}))$ iterations, where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ the number of edges, and $w_{\max}$ is the maximum edge weight in the problem instance. This result confirms, via mathematical means, the good performance of the NSGA-II observed empirically. It also shows that mathematical analyses of this algorithm are not only possible for synthetic benchmark problems, but also for more complex combinatorial optimization problems. As a side result, we also obtain a new analysis of the performance of the global SEMO algorithm on the bi-objective minimum spanning tree problem, which improves the previous best result by a factor of $|F|$, the number of extremal points of the Pareto front, a set that can be as large as $n w_{\max}$. The main reason for this improvement is our observation that both multi-objective evolutionary algorithms find the different extremal points in parallel rather than sequentially, as assumed in the previous proofs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Fair Correlation Clustering in Forests

The study of algorithmic fairness received growing attention recently. This stems from the awareness that bias in the input data for machine learning systems may result in discriminatory outputs. For clustering tasks, one of the most central notions of fairness is the formalization by Chierichetti, Kumar, Lattanzi, and Vassilvitskii [NeurIPS 2017]. A clustering is said to be fair, if each cluster has the same distribution of manifestations of a sensitive attribute as the whole input set. This is motivated by various applications where the objects to be clustered have sensitive attributes that should not be over- or underrepresented. We discuss the applicability of this fairness notion to Correlation Clustering. The existing literature on the resulting Fair Correlation Clustering problem either presents approximation algorithms with poor approximation guarantees or severely limits the possible distributions of the sensitive attribute (often only two manifestations with a 1:1 ratio are considered). Our goal is to understand if there is hope for better results in between these two extremes. To this end, we consider restricted graph classes which allow us to characterize the distributions of sensitive attributes for which this form of fairness is tractable from a complexity point of view. While existing work on Fair Correlation Clustering gives approximation algorithms, we focus on exact solutions and investigate whether there are efficiently solvable instances. The unfair version of Correlation Clustering is trivial on forests, but adding fairness creates a surprisingly rich picture of complexities. We give an overview of the distributions and types of forests where Fair Correlation Clustering turns from tractable to intractable. The most surprising insight to us is the fact that the cause of the hardness of Fair Correlation Clustering is not the strictness of the fairness condition.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Fixed-Parameter Sensitivity Oracles

We combine ideas from distance sensitivity oracles (DSOs) and fixed-parameter tractability (FPT) to design sensitivity oracles for FPT graph problems. An oracle with sensitivity $f$ for an FPT problem $Π$ on a graph $G$ with parameter $k$ preprocesses $G$ in time $O(g(f,k) \cdot \textsf{poly}(n))$. When queried with a set $F$ of at most $f$ edges of $G$, the oracle reports the answer to the $Π$-with the same parameter $k$-on the graph $G-F$, i.e., $G$ deprived of $F$. The oracle should answer queries in a time that is significantly faster than merely running the best-known FPT algorithm on $G-F$ from scratch. We mainly design sensitivity oracles for the $k$-Path and the $k$-Vertex Cover problem. Following our line of research connecting fault-tolerant FPT and shortest paths problems, we also introduce parameterization to the computation of distance preservers. We study the problem, given a directed unweighted graph with a fixed source $s$ and parameters $f$ and $k$, to construct a polynomial-sized oracle that efficiently reports, for any target vertex $v$ and set $F$ of at most $f$ edges, whether the distance from $s$ to $v$ increases at most by an additive term of $k$ in $G-F$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Maps for Learning Indexable Classes

We study learning of indexed families from positive data where a learner can freely choose a hypothesis space (with uniformly decidable membership) comprising at least the languages to be learned. This abstracts a very universal learning task which can be found in many areas, for example learning of (subsets of) regular languages or learning of natural languages. We are interested in various restrictions on learning, such as consistency, conservativeness or set-drivenness, exemplifying various natural learning restrictions. Building on previous results from the literature, we provide several maps (depictions of all pairwise relations) of various groups of learning criteria, including a map for monotonicity restrictions and similar criteria and a map for restrictions on data presentation. Furthermore, we consider, for various learning criteria, whether learners can be assumed consistent.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Learning Languages with Decidable Hypotheses

In language learning in the limit, the most common type of hypothesis is to give an enumerator for a language. This so-called $W$-index allows for naming arbitrary computably enumerable languages, with the drawback that even the membership problem is undecidable. In this paper we use a different system which allows for naming arbitrary decidable languages, namely programs for characteristic functions (called $C$-indices). These indices have the drawback that it is now not decidable whether a given hypothesis is even a legal $C$-index. In this first analysis of learning with $C$-indices, we give a structured account of the learning power of various restrictions employing $C$-indices, also when compared with $W$-indices. We establish a hierarchy of learning power depending on whether $C$-indices are required (a) on all outputs; (b) only on outputs relevant for the class to be learned and (c) only in the limit as final, correct hypotheses. Furthermore, all these settings are weaker than learning with $W$-indices (even when restricted to classes of computable languages). We analyze all these questions also in relation to the mode of data presentation. Finally, we also ask about the relation of semantic versus syntactic convergence and derive the map of pairwise relations for these two kinds of convergence coupled with various forms of data presentation.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

A Strategic Routing Framework and Algorithms for Computing Alternative Paths

Traditional navigation services find the fastest route for a single driver. Though always using the fastest route seems desirable for every individual, selfish behavior can have undesirable effects such as higher energy consumption and avoidable congestion, even leading to higher overall and individual travel times. In contrast, strategic routing aims at optimizing the traffic for all agents regarding a global optimization goal. We introduce a framework to formalize real-world strategic routing scenarios as algorithmic problems and study one of them, which we call Single Alternative Path (SAP), in detail. There, we are given an original route between a single origin--destination pair. The goal is to suggest an alternative route to all agents that optimizes the overall travel time under the assumption that the agents distribute among both routes according to a psychological model, for which we introduce the concept of Pareto-conformity. We show that the SAP problem is NP-complete, even for such models. Nonetheless, assuming Pareto-conformity, we give multiple algorithms for different variants of SAP, using multi-criteria shortest path algorithms as subroutines. Moreover, we prove that several natural models are in fact Pareto-conform. The implementation of our algorithms serves as a proof of concept, showing that SAP can be solved in reasonable time even though the algorithms have exponential running time in the worst case.

cs.DS↗