arXiv subjects

Sisi Jian

Publications and source records attributed to Sisi Jian.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ResiliFlow: An Open Transport World Model for Infrastructure Perception and Disaster Resilience

Transport resilience work is often split across separate data preparation scripts, network models, simulation tools, image inspection systems and reports. This fragmentation makes it difficult to move from an observation to a tested and reviewable decision. We introduce ResiliFlow, an open transport world model concept and an implemented platform for infrastructure resilience, response and recovery. The platform connects two workspaces. Disaster Transport Resilience Analysis provides six map-centred functions for critical-road and critical-area identification, recovery prioritisation, disruption routing, resilience testing and scenario simulation. AI-based Transport Infrastructure Perception and Decision Support organises street-level and satellite evidence, detects visible road, footpath and kerb conditions, and prepares these observations for human-reviewed intervention planning. Both workspaces share an eight-step cycle of perception, prediction, model development, verification, execution, decision, feedback and memory. Research Validation records assumptions and checks, while a local Assistant and an optional multi-provider large language model Copilot translate user questions into bounded calls to executable tools. We document the platform architecture, representative mathematical models, interface evidence and computer-vision learning results. Examples show accurate recognition across eight visible-condition classes, while compact error analysis demonstrates how difficult cases guide continued learning. ResiliFlow shows how transport models can become an inspectable, reusable and question-led system rather than a collection of disconnected analyses. The accompanying release is intended to support research collaboration, public scrutiny and extension under institutional review.

math.OC↗

arXiv2025

Can Large Language Models Capture Human Risk Preferences? A Cross-Cultural Study

Large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides, extending their applications to dialogue systems, automated content creation, and domain-specific advisory tasks. However, as their use grows, concerns have emerged regarding their reliability in simulating complex decision-making behavior, such as risky decision-making, where a single choice can lead to multiple outcomes. This study investigates the ability of LLMs to simulate risky decision-making scenarios. We compare model-generated decisions with actual human responses in a series of lottery-based tasks, using transportation stated preference survey data from participants in Sydney, Dhaka, Hong Kong, and Nanjing. Demographic inputs were provided to two LLMs -- ChatGPT 4o and ChatGPT o1-mini -- which were tasked with predicting individual choices. Risk preferences were analyzed using the Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) framework. Results show that both models exhibit more risk-averse behavior than human participants, with o1-mini aligning more closely with observed human decisions. Further analysis of multilingual data from Nanjing and Hong Kong indicates that model predictions in Chinese deviate more from actual responses compared to English, suggesting that prompt language may influence simulation performance. These findings highlight both the promise and the current limitations of LLMs in replicating human-like risk behavior, particularly in linguistic and cultural settings.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Mobility as a Resource (MaaR) for resilient human-centric automation: a vision paper

With technological advances, mobility has been moving from a product (i.e., traditional modes and vehicles), to a service (i.e., Mobility as a Service, MaaS). However, as observed in other fields (e.g. cloud computing resource management) we argue that mobility will evolve from a service to a resource (i.e., Mobility as a Resource, MaaR). Further, due to increasing scarcity of shared mobility spaces across traditional and emerging modes, the transition must be viewed within the critical need for ethical and equitable solutions for the traveling public (i.e., research is needed to avoid hyper-market driven outcomes for society). The evolution of mobility into a resource requires novel conceptual frameworks, technologies, processes and perspectives of analysis. A key component of the future MaaR system is the technological capacity to observe, allocate and manage (in real-time) the smallest envisionable units of mobility (i.e., atomic units of mobility capacity) while providing prioritized attention to human movement and ethical metrics related to access, consumption and impact. To facilitate research into the envisioned future system, this paper proposes initial frameworks which synthesize and advance methodologies relating to highly dynamic capacity reservation systems. Future research requires synthesis across transport network management, demand behavior, mixed-mode usage, and equitable mobility.

eess.SY↗