arXiv subjects

Sk Samim Islam

Publications and source records attributed to Sk Samim Islam.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

An Improved Upper Bound for the Tur\'an Number of the Hexagon

For a graph $F$, the Tur\'an number $\operatorname{ex}(n,F)$ is the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph containing no copy of $F$. Determining the Tur\'an numbers of even cycles is a central problem in extremal graph theory and remains open in general. For $C_6$, the best previous upper bound was due to F\"uredi, Naor, and Verstra\"ete [Advances in Mathematics, 2006], who proved that, for sufficiently large positive integer $n$, $$ \operatorname{ex}(n,C_6) \leq \lambda n^{4/3}+O(n)<0.6272 n^{4/3}, $$ where $\lambda$ is the real root of $ 16\lambda^3-4\lambda^2+\lambda-3=0$. We improve this bound by showing that, for sufficiently large positive integer $n$, $$ \operatorname{ex}(n,C_6) \leq \alpha n^{4/3}+O(n)<0.6144 n^{4/3}, $$ where $\alpha$ is the unique real root of $ 4 \alpha^{3} (3/2)^{1-1/(2\alpha)} =1$ in the interval $(1/2,2/3)$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Broadcast Domination Number is at Most Twice the Multipacking Number

For a graph $ G = (V, E) $ with a vertex set $ V $ and an edge set $ E $, a function $ f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, . . . , diam(G)\} $ is called a \emph{broadcast} on $ G $. For each vertex $ u \in V $, if there exists a vertex $ v $ in $ G $ (possibly, $ u = v $) such that $ f (v) > 0 $ and $ d(u, v) \leq f (v) $, then $ f $ is called a dominating broadcast on $ G $. The cost of the dominating broadcast $f$ is the quantity $ \sum_{v\in V}f(v) $. The minimum cost of a dominating broadcast is the broadcast domination number of $G$, denoted by $ \gamma_{b}(G) $. A multipacking is a set $ M \subseteq V $ in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V $ and for every integer $ r \geq 1 $, the ball of radius $ r $ around $ v $ contains at most $ r $ vertices of $ M $, that is, there are at most $ r $ vertices in $ M $ at a distance at most $ r $ from $ v $ in $ G $. The multipacking number of $ G $ is the maximum cardinality of a multipacking of $ G $ and is denoted by $ mp(G) $. It is known that $mp(G)\leq\gamma_b(G)$. In 2014, Hartnell and Mynhardt proved that $\gamma_b(G)\leq 3mp(G)-2$ whenever $mp(G)\geq2$. In 2019, Beaudou, Brewster, and Foucaud improved this bound to $\gamma_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)+3$ and conjectured that $\gamma_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)$. We solve their conjecture by proving that $\gamma_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)$ for every graph $G$. Our proof is constructive and yields a polynomial-time $2$-approximation algorithm for Maximum Multipacking problem which improves the earlier approximation factor $2+o(1)$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Minimum eccentricity shortest paths of $K_{2,3}$-minor-free graphs

Given a simple, undirected, and unweighted graph $G$, and an integer $R$, the objective of the \textsc{Minimum Eccentricity Shortest Path (MESP)} is to decide whether there exists an \emph{isometric path} $P$ in $G$ such that the distance from every vertex in the graph to its nearest vertex in $P$ is at most $R$. In this paper, we prove that MESP admits an $O(n^4)$-time algorithm on $K_{2,3}$-minor-free graphs. Our algorithm has a cubic running time when the inputs are restricted to a cactus.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

On the Complexity of Hop Domination and 2-Step Domination in Graph Classes

The domination problem is a well-studied problem in graph theory. In this paper, we study two natural variants: the hop domination problem and the $2$-step domination problem. Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$. For a graph $G$, a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called an \emph{hop dominating set} if every vertex not in $S$ lies at distance of exactly $2$ from at least one vertex in $S$. For $v\in V(G)$, let $N(v,2)$ denote the set of vertices in $V(G)$ that are at distance exactly $2$ from $v$. For a graph $G$, a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called an \emph{$2$-step dominating set} if every vertex $v\in V(G)$ lies at a distance of exactly $2$ from at least one vertex in $S$. The \textsc{Hop Domination} (HD) problem and the \textsc{$2$-Step Domination} ($2$SD) problems ask whether a graph contains a hop domination set or a $2$-step domination set of size at most $k$, respectively. We study the computational complexity of these problems, and show that both are NP-complete, even when restricted to $d$-regular graphs for every $d\geq 3$, claw-free graphs and also unit disk graphs.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Parameterized complexity of $r$-Hop, $r$-Step, and $r$-Hop Roman Domination

The \textsc{Dominating Set} problem is a classical and extensively studied topic in graph theory and theoretical computer science. In this paper, we examine the algorithmic complexity of several well-known exact-distance variants of domination, namely \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination}. Let $G$ be a graph and let $r \geq 2$ be an integer. A set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is an \emph{$r$-hop dominating set} if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus S$ is at distance exactly $r$ from some vertex of $S$. Similarly, $S$ is an \emph{$r$-step dominating set} if every vertex of $G$ lies at distance exactly $r$ from at least one vertex of $S$. An \emph{$r$-hop Roman dominating function} on $G$ is a function $f \colon V(G)\to\{0,1,2\}$ such that for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u$ at distance exactly $r$ from $v$ with $f(u)=2$. The \emph{weight} of $f$ is defined as $f(V)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. The \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} (respectively, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}) problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop dominating set (respectively, $r$-step dominating set) of size at most $k$, while the \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop Roman dominating function of weight at most $k$. It is known that for every $r\ge 2$, the problems \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} are \textsc{NP}-complete. First we prove that for all $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} is \textsc{W[2]}-complete. Furthermore, for every $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination} and \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} remain \textsc{W[2]}-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. Unless the ETH fails, none of these problems admits an algorithm running in time $2^{o(n+m)}$ on graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Multipacking on graphs and Euclidean metric space

A \emph{multipacking} in an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ is a set $M\subseteq V$ such that for every vertex $v\in V$ and for every integer $r\geq 1$, the ball of radius $ r $ around $ v $ contains at most $r$ vertices of $M$. The \textsc{Multipacking} problem asks whether a graph contains a multipacking of size at least $k$. For more than a decade, it remained open whether \textsc{Multipacking} is \textsc{NP-complete} or polynomial-time solvable, although it is known to be polynomial-time solvable for some classes (e.g., strongly chordal graphs and grids). Foucaud, Gras, Perez, and Sikora [\textit{Algorithmica} 2021] showed it is \textsc{NP-complete} for directed graphs and \textsc{W[1]-hard} when parameterized by the solution size. We resolve the open question by proving \textsc{Multipacking} is \textsc{NP-complete} for undirected graphs and \textsc{W[2]-hard} when parameterized by the solution size. Furthermore, we show it remains \textsc{NP-complete} and \textsc{W[2]-hard} even for chordal, bipartite, claw-free, regular, CONV, and chordal$\cap\frac{1}{2}$-hyperbolic graphs (a superclass of strongly chordal graphs), and we provide approximation algorithms for cactus, chordal, and $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs. Moreover, we study the relationship between multipacking number and broadcast domination number for cactus, chordal, and $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs. Further, we prove that for all $r\geq 2$, \textsc{$r$-Multipacking} is \textsc{NP-complete} even for planar bipartite graphs with bounded degree, and also for bounded-diameter chordal and bounded-diameter bipartite graphs. For geometric variants, in $\mathbb{R}^2$ a maximum $1$-multipacking can be computed in polynomial time, but computing a maximum $2$-multipacking is \textsc{NP-hard}, and we provide approximation and parameterized algorithms for the $2$-multipacking problem.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

On the complexity of Multipacking

A multipacking in an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ is a set $M\subseteq V$ such that for every vertex $v\in V$ and for every integer $r\geq 1$, the ball of radius $r$ around $v$ contains at most $r$ vertices of $M$, that is, there are at most $r$ vertices in $M$ at a distance at most $r$ from $v$ in $G$. The Multipacking problem asks whether a graph contains a multipacking of size at least $k$. For more than a decade, it remained an open question whether the Multipacking problem is NP-complete or solvable in polynomial time. Whereas the problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable for certain graph classes (e.g., strongly chordal graphs, grids, etc). Foucaud, Gras, Perez, and Sikora [Algorithmica 2021] made a step towards solving the open question by showing that the Multipacking problem is NP-complete for directed graphs and it is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the solution size. In this paper, we prove that the Multipacking problem is NP-complete for undirected graphs, which answers the open question. Moreover, the problem is W[2]-hard for undirected graphs when parameterized by the solution size. Furthermore, we have shown that the problem is NP-complete and W[2]-hard (when parameterized by the solution size) even for various subclasses: chordal, bipartite, and claw-free graphs. Whereas, it is NP-complete for regular, and CONV graphs (intersection graphs of convex sets in the plane). Additionally, the problem is NP-complete and W[2]-hard (when parameterized by the solution size) for chordal $\cap$ $\frac{1}{2}$-hyperbolic graphs, which is a superclass of strongly chordal graphs where the problem is polynomial-time solvable. On the positive side, we present an exact exponential-time algorithm for the Multipacking problem on $n$-vertex general graphs, which breaks the $2^n$ barrier by achieving a running time of $O^*(1.58^n)$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

On the Number of Almost Empty Monochromatic Triangles

In this paper, we consider the problem of counting almost empty monochromatic triangles in colored planar point sets, that is, triangles whose vertices are all assigned the same color and that contain only a few interior points. Specifically, we show that any $c$-coloring of a set of $n$ points in the plane in general position (that is, no three on a line) contains $\Omega(n^2)$ monochromatic triangles with at most $c-1$ interior points and $\Omega(n^{\frac{4}{3}})$ monochromatic triangles with at most $c-2$ interior points, for any fixed $c \geq 2$. The latter, in particular, generalizes the result of Pach and T\'{o}th (2013) on the number of monochromatic empty triangles in 2-colored point sets, to the setting of multiple colors and monochromatic triangles with a few interior points. We also derive the limiting value of the expected number of triangles with $s$ interior points in random point sets, for any integer $s \geq 0$. As a result, we obtain the expected number of monochromatic triangles with at most $s$ interior points in random colorings of random point sets.

math.CO↗

arXiv2024

Multipacking in Euclidean Metric Space

Here we study the multipacking problems for geometric point sets with respect to their Euclidean distances. We consider a set of $n$ points $P$ and define $N_s[v]$ as the subset of $P$ that includes the $s$ nearest points of $v \in P$ and the point $v$ itself. We assume that the \emph{$s$-th neighbor} of each point is unique, for every $s \in \{0, 1, 2, \dots , n-1\}$. For a natural number $r \leq n-1$, an $r$-multipacking is a set $ M \subseteq P $ such that for each point $ v \in P $ and for every integer $ 1\leq s \leq r $, $|N_s[v]\cap M|\leq (s+1)/2$. The $r$-multipacking number of $ P $ is the maximum cardinality of an $r$-multipacking of $ P $ and is denoted by $ \MP_{r}(P) $. For $r=n-1$, an $r$-multipacking is called a multipacking and $r$-multipacking number is called as multipacking number. For $r=1 \text{ and } 2$, we study the problem of computing a maximum $r$-multipacking of the point sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$. We show that a maximum $1$-multipacking can be computed in polynomial time but computing a maximum $2$-multipacking is \textsc{NP-hard}. Further, we provide approximation and parameterized solutions to the $2$-multipacking problem.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Growth Rate of the Number of Empty Triangles in the Plane

Given a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane, in general position, denote by $N_\Delta(P)$ the number of empty triangles with vertices in $P$. In this paper we investigate by how much $N_\Delta(P)$ changes if a point $x$ is removed from $P$. By constructing a graph $G_P(x)$ based on the arrangement of the empty triangles incident on $x$, we transform this geometric problem to the problem of counting triangles in the graph $G_P(x)$. We study properties of the graph $G_P(x)$ and, in particular, show that it is kite-free. This relates the growth rate of the number of empty triangles to the famous Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi problem.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2023

Relation between broadcast domination and multipacking numbers on chordal and other hyperbolic graphs

For a graph $ G = (V, E) $ with a vertex set $ V $ and an edge set $ E $, a function $ f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, . . . , diam(G)\} $ is called a \emph{broadcast} on $ G $. For each vertex $ u \in V $, if there exists a vertex $ v $ in $ G $ (possibly, $ u = v $) such that $ f (v) > 0 $ and $ d(u, v) \leq f (v) $, then $ f $ is called a dominating broadcast on $ G $. The cost of the dominating broadcast $f$ is the quantity $ \sum_{v\in V}f(v) $. The minimum cost of a dominating broadcast is the broadcast domination number of $G$, denoted by $ \gamma_{b}(G) $. A multipacking is a set $ S \subseteq V $ in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V $ and for every integer $ r \geq 1 $, the ball of radius $ r $ around $ v $ contains at most $ r $ vertices of $ S $, that is, there are at most $ r $ vertices in $ S $ at a distance at most $ r $ from $ v $ in $ G $. The multipacking number of $ G $ is the maximum cardinality of a multipacking of $ G $ and is denoted by $ mp(G) $. We show that, for any connected chordal graph $G$, $\gamma_{b}(G)\leq \big\lceil{\frac{3}{2} mp(G)\big\rceil}$. We also show that $\gamma_b(G)-mp(G)$ can be arbitrarily large for connected chordal graphs by constructing an infinite family of connected chordal graphs such that the ratio $\gamma_b(G)/mp(G)=10/9$, with $mp(G)$ arbitrarily large. Moreover, we show that $\gamma_{b}(G)\leq \big\lfloor{\frac{3}{2} mp(G)+2\delta\big\rfloor} $ holds for all $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs. In addition, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to construct a multipacking of a $\delta$-hyperbolic graph $G$ of size at least $ \big\lceil{\frac{2mp(G)-4\delta}{3} \big\rceil} $.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2023

Burning a binary tree and its generalization

Graph burning is a graph process that models the spread of social contagion. Initially, all the vertices of a graph $G$ are unburnt. At each step, an unburnt vertex is put on fire and the fire from burnt vertices of the previous step spreads to their adjacent unburnt vertices. This process continues till all the vertices are burnt. The burning number $b(G)$ of the graph $G$ is the minimum number of steps required to burn all the vertices in the graph. The burning number conjecture by Bonato et al. states that for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(G) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$. It is easy to observe that in order to burn a graph it is enough to burn its spanning tree. Hence it suffices to prove that for any tree $T$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ where $T$ is the spanning tree of $G$. It was proved in 2018 that $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 1/4} +1/2 \rceil$ for a tree $T$ where $n_2$ is the number of degree $2$ vertices in $T$. In this paper, we provide an algorithm to burn a tree and we improve the existing bound using this algorithm. We prove that $b(T)\leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 8}\rceil -1$ which is an improved bound for $n\geq 50$. We also provide an algorithm to burn some subclasses of the binary tree and prove the burning number conjecture for the same.

math.CO↗

arXiv2023

Multipacking and broadcast domination on cactus graph and its impact on hyperbolic graph

For a graph $G$, $ mp(G) $ is the multipacking number, and $\gamma_b(G)$ is the broadcast domination number. It is known that $mp(G)\leq \gamma_b(G)$ and $\gamma_b(G)\leq 2mp(G)+3$ for any graph $G$, and it was shown that $\gamma_b(G)-mp(G)$ can be arbitrarily large for connected graphs. It is conjectured that $\gamma_b(G)\leq 2mp(G)$ for any general graph $G$. We show that, for any cactus graph $G$, $\gamma_b(G)\leq \frac{3}{2}mp(G)+\frac{11}{2}$. We also show that $\gamma_b(G)-mp(G)$ can be arbitrarily large for cactus graphs and asteroidal triple-free graphs by constructing an infinite family of cactus graphs which are also asteroidal triple-free graphs such that the ratio $\gamma_b(G)/mp(G)=4/3$, with $mp(G)$ arbitrarily large. This result shows that, for cactus graphs, the bound $\gamma_b(G)\leq \frac{3}{2}mp(G)+\frac{11}{2}$ cannot be improved to a bound in the form $\gamma_b(G)\leq c_1\cdot mp(G)+c_2$, for any constant $c_1<4/3$ and $c_2$. Moreover, we provide an $O(n)$-time algorithm to construct a multipacking of cactus graph $G$ of size at least $ \frac{2}{3}mp(G)-\frac{11}{3} $, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph $G$. The hyperbolicity of the cactus graph class is unbounded. For $0$-hyperbolic graphs, $mp(G)=\gamma_b(G)$. Moreover, $mp(G)=\gamma_b(G)$ holds for the strongly chordal graphs which is a subclass of $\frac{1}{2}$-hyperbolic graphs. Now it's a natural question: what is the minimum value of $\delta$, for which we can say that the difference $ \gamma_{b}(G) - mp(G) $ can be arbitrarily large for $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs? We show that the minimum value of $\delta$ is $\frac{1}{2}$ using a construction of an infinite family of cactus graphs with hyperbolicity $\frac{1}{2}$.

cs.DM↗