SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Sneha Jaiswal

Publications and source records attributed to Sneha Jaiswal.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Updates on SM predictions of $|V_{cb}|$ and $R(D^{*})$ in $B\to D^{*}\ellν_\ell$ decays

We update the standard model (SM) predictions of $R(D^*)$ using the latest results on the decay distributions in $B \to D^* \ell ν_{\ell}$ ($\ell = μ, e$) by Belle collaboration, while extracting $|V_{cb}|$ at the same time. Depending on the inputs used in the analysis, we define various fit scenarios. Although the central values of the predicted $R(D^*)$ in all the scenarios have reduced from its earlier predictions in 2017, the results are consistent with each other within the uncertainties. In this analysis, our prediction of $R(D^*)$ is consistent with the respective world average at $\sim 3σ$. We have also predicted several angular observables associated with $B \to D^* τν_τ$ decays. We note that the predicted $F_L(D^*)$ is consistent with the corresponding measurement at 2$σ$. Utilizing these new results, we fit the Wilson coefficients appearing beyond the standard model of particle physics (BSM). To see the trend of SM predictions, we have utilized the recently published preliminary results on the form-factors at non-zero recoil by the lattice groups like Fermilab-MILC and JLQCD and predicted the observables in $B \to D^* \ell ν_{\ell}$, and $B \to D^* τν_τ$ decays.

hep-ph

Extraction of $|V_{cb}|$ from $B\to D^{(*)}\ellν_\ell$ and the Standard Model predictions of $R(D^{(*)})$

We extract $|V_{cb}|$ from the available data in the decay $B \to D^{(*)}\ellν_{\ell}$. Our analysis uses the $q^2(w)$ binned differential decay rates in different subsamples of $B\to D\ellν_\ell$ ($\ell = e, μ$), while for the decay $B\to D^*\ellν_\ell$, the unfolded binned differential decay rates of four kinematic variables including the $q^2$ bins have been used. In the CLN and BGL parameterizations of the form factors, the combined fit to all the available data along with their correlations yields $|V_{cb}| = (39.77 \pm 0.89)\times 10^{-3}$ and $(40.90 \pm 0.94)\times 10^{-3}$ respectively. In these fits, we have used the inputs from lattice and light cone sum rule (LCSR) along with the data. Using our fit results and the HQET relations (with the known corrections included) amongst the form factors, and parameterizing the unknown higher order corrections (in the ratios of HQET form factors) with a conservative estimate of the normalizing parameters, we obtain $R(D^{*}) = 0.259 \pm 0.006$ (CLN) and $R(D^*) = 0.257 \pm 0.005$ (BGL).

hep-ph