Sobyasachi Chatterjee

arXiv2026

From One Solution to Many: An Oracle-Based FPT Framework for Diverse Solutions under Generalized Diversity Measures

The problem of computing \emph{diverse} solutions has recently emerged as an important area of study, motivated by applications in fairness, robustness, and security. Instead of returning a single feasible or optimal solution, the goal is to output a \emph{collection} of meaningfully different solutions, often measured by symmetric differences. Diverse variants have been studied using sparsification, network-flow reductions, and algebraic techniques. We investigate the fixed-parameter tractability of diverse variants of an implicit set-system problem. Given parameters $k$ and $r$ and a threshold $b$, the task is to compute $r$ feasible solutions, each of size at most $k$, whose diversity under a specified objective is at least $b$. Our main contribution is an oracle-based meta-theorem. We identify a broad class of objectives, called \emph{consistently diverse}, that includes several standard measures. Assuming an \emph{exact empty-extension oracle} given a forbidden set ${\sf Forb}$, which returns a feasible solution of a prescribed size avoiding ${\sf Forb}$ or reports that none exists, we obtain a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by $k+r$. The algorithm makes at most $(2kr)^{kr} \cdot r$ oracle calls, and in each call the oracle parameter satisfies $s+|{\sf Forb}| \leq k+2kr$. Our framework unifies and strengthens previous oracle-based approaches. Compared with Kumabe's framework (ESA 2025), which gives a doubly exponential bound on the number of oracle calls, our approach achieves the single exponential bound $2^{O(kr\log(kr))}$ and directly constructs the desired tuple of solutions. We recover fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for all problems covered by that framework, with improved oracle complexity, and obtain strong bounds for diverse variants of classical graph and matroid problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Dominating Set with Quotas: Balancing Coverage and Constraints

We study a natural generalization of the classical \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, called \textsc{Dominating Set with Quotas} (DSQ). In this problem, we are given a graph $ G $, an integer $ k $, and for each vertex $ v \in V(G) $, a lower quota $ \mathrm{lo}_v $ and an upper quota $ \mathrm{up}_v $. The goal is to determine whether there exists a set $ S \subseteq V(G) $ of size at most $ k $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V(G) $, the number of vertices in its closed neighborhood that belong to $ S $, i.e., $ |N[v] \cap S| $, lies within the range $ [\mathrm{lo}_v, \mathrm{up}_v] $. This richer model captures a variety of practical settings where both under- and over-coverage must be avoided -- such as in fault-tolerant infrastructure, load-balanced facility placement, or constrained communication networks. While DS is already known to be computationally hard, we show that the added expressiveness of per-vertex quotas in DSQ introduces additional algorithmic challenges. In particular, we prove that DSQ becomes \W[1]-hard even on structurally sparse graphs -- such as those with degeneracy 2, or excluding $ K_{3,3} $ as a subgraph -- despite these classes admitting FPT algorithms for DS. On the positive side, we show that DSQ is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by solution size and treewidth, and more generally, on nowhere dense graph classes. Furthermore, we design a subexponential-time algorithm for DSQ on apex-minor-free graphs using the bidimensionality framework. These results collectively offer a refined view of the algorithmic landscape of DSQ, revealing a sharp contrast with the classical DS problem and identifying the key structural properties that govern tractability.

cs.DS↗