arXiv subjects

Songfa Zhong

Publications and source records attributed to Songfa Zhong.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models

Altruism is fundamental to human societies, fostering cooperation and social cohesion. Recent studies suggest that large language models (LLMs) can display human-like prosocial behavior, but the internal computations that produce such behavior remain poorly understood. We investigate the mechanisms underlying LLM altruism using sparse autoencoders (SAEs). In a standard Dictator Game, minimal-pair prompts that differ only in social stance (generous versus selfish) induce large, economically meaningful shifts in allocations. Leveraging this contrast, we identify a set of SAE features (0.024% of all features across the model's layers) whose activations are strongly associated with the behavioral shift. To interpret these features, we use benchmark tasks motivated by dual-process theories to classify a subset as primarily heuristic (System 1) or primarily deliberative (System 2). Causal interventions validate their functional role: activation patching and continuous steering of this feature direction reliably shift allocation distributions, with System 2 features exerting a more proximal influence on the model's final output than System 1 features. The same steering direction generalizes across multiple social-preference games. Together, these results enhance our understanding of artificial cognition by translating altruistic behaviors into identifiable network states and provide a framework for aligning LLM behavior with human values, thereby informing more transparent and value-aligned deployment.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

When Experimental Economics Meets Large Language Models: Evidence-based Tactics

Advancements in large language models (LLMs) have sparked a growing interest in measuring and understanding their behavior through experimental economics. However, there is still a lack of established guidelines for designing economic experiments for LLMs. Inspired by principles from experimental economics with insights from LLM research in artificial intelligence, we outline key considerations in the experimental design and implementation stage, and perform two sets of experiments to assess the impact of these considerations on LLMs' responses. Based on our findings, we discuss seven practical tactics for conducting experiments with LLMs. Our study enhances the design, replicability, and generalizability of LLM experiments, and broadens the scope of experimental economics in the digital age.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

How General Are Measures of Choice Consistency? Evidence from Experimental and Scanner Data

Choice consistency with utility maximization, as a key assumption in economics, has been extensively used to evaluate decision quality of individuals and to predict real-world outcomes across different contexts. Here we investigate the generalizability of consistency measures derived from budgetary decisions in the lab-in-the-field experiment and purchasing decisions using supermarket scanner data. In the first study, we observe a lack of correlation between consistency scores derived from risky decisions in the experiment and those from supermarket food purchasing decisions. In the second study, we observe moderate correlations between experimental tasks and low to moderate correlations across purchasing categories and over time periods within the supermarket. Moreover, consistency in the two settings exhibits distinct predictive validity in predicting consumer behavior. These results suggest that choice consistency, as a measure of decision quality, may be better characterized as a multidimensional skill set rather than a single-dimensional ability.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2023

The Emergence of Economic Rationality of GPT

As large language models (LLMs) like GPT become increasingly prevalent, it is essential that we assess their capabilities beyond language processing. This paper examines the economic rationality of GPT by instructing it to make budgetary decisions in four domains: risk, time, social, and food preferences. We measure economic rationality by assessing the consistency of GPT's decisions with utility maximization in classic revealed preference theory. We find that GPT's decisions are largely rational in each domain and demonstrate higher rationality score than those of human subjects in a parallel experiment and in the literature. Moreover, the estimated preference parameters of GPT are slightly different from human subjects and exhibit a lower degree of heterogeneity. We also find that the rationality scores are robust to the degree of randomness and demographic settings such as age and gender, but are sensitive to contexts based on the language frames of the choice situations. These results suggest the potential of LLMs to make good decisions and the need to further understand their capabilities, limitations, and underlying mechanisms.

econ.GN↗