Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Sophie Quérouil

Publications and source records attributed to Sophie Quérouil.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Why do dolphins form mixed-species associations in the Azores ?

Mixed-species associations are temporary associations between individuals of different species that are often observed in birds, primates and cetaceans. They have been interpreted as a strategy to reduce predation risk, enhance foraging success and/or provide a social advantage. In the archipelago of the Azores, four species of dolphins are commonly involved in mixed-species associations: the common dolphin, Delphinus delphis, the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, the striped dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba, and the spotted dolphin, Stenella frontalis. In order to understand the reasons why dolphins associate, we analysed field data collected since 1999 by research scientists and trained observers placed onboard fishing vessels. In total, 113 mixed-species groups were observed out of 5720 sightings. The temporal distribution, habitat (water depth, distance to the coast), behaviour (i.e. feeding, travelling, socializing), size and composition of mixed-species groups were compared with those of single-species groups. Results did not support the predation avoidance hypothesis and gave little support to the social advantage hypothesis. The foraging advantage hypothesis was the most convincing. However, the benefits of mixed-species associations appeared to depend on the species. Associations were likely to be opportunistic in the larger bottlenose dolphin, while there seemed to be some evolutionary constraints favouring associations in the rarer striped dolphin. Comparison with previous studies suggests that the formation of mixed-species groups depends on several environmental factors, and therefore may constitute an adaptive response.

q-bio.PE↗

Intérêts et limites de l'approche moléculaire pour aborder la biogéographie et la spéciation : l'exemple de quelques Mammifères d'Afrique tropicale

We attempted to test biogeographic hypotheses proposed for the evolution of tropical faunas using mitochondrial DNA sequences of selected African mammalian taxa (Insectivora, Rodentia and Primates). 1/ we constructed a molecular phylogeny of taxa in order to ascertain their monophyly and calibrate a molecular clock; 2/ we analysed and compared the phylogeographic patterns of five forest-dwelling taxa; 3/ we evaluated the evolutionary processes potentially involved in the speciation of cercopithecine Primates. Phylogenetic results confirm that gene history is not necessarily the same as organism history. Phylogeographic analyses reveal distinct patterns for each model species, suggesting differences in initial distributions or different responses to the same events. They indicate a role of Plio-Pleistocene vicariance events in the intra-specific diversification of small mammals. Thus, genetic divergence would be much older than the last glacial cycles. In cercopithecine Primates, speciation would have been predominantly allopatric and driven by Miocene and Pliocene vicariance events. Altogether, results give support to the refuge hypothesis, without excluding the riverine barrier nor the paleogrographic ones. They emphasize the role of paleo-ecological changes in generating diversity and of the main riverine barriers in shaping the present distribution of that diversity.

q-bio.PE↗