arXiv subjects

Soren Christensen

Publications and source records attributed to Soren Christensen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

USE-Evaluator: Performance Metrics for Medical Image Segmentation Models with Uncertain, Small or Empty Reference Annotations

Performance metrics for medical image segmentation models are used to measure the agreement between the reference annotation and the predicted segmentation. Usually, overlap metrics, such as the Dice, are used as a metric to evaluate the performance of these models in order for results to be comparable. However, there is a mismatch between the distributions of cases and difficulty level of segmentation tasks in public data sets compared to clinical practice. Common metrics fail to measure the impact of this mismatch, especially for clinical data sets that include low signal pathologies, a difficult segmentation task, and uncertain, small, or empty reference annotations. This limitation may result in ineffective research of machine learning practitioners in designing and optimizing models. Dimensions of evaluating clinical value include consideration of the uncertainty of reference annotations, independence from reference annotation volume size, and evaluation of classification of empty reference annotations. We study how uncertain, small, and empty reference annotations influence the value of metrics for medical image segmentation on an in-house data set regardless of the model. We examine metrics behavior on the predictions of a standard deep learning framework in order to identify metrics with clinical value. We compare to a public benchmark data set (BraTS 2019) with a high-signal pathology and certain, larger, and no empty reference annotations. We may show machine learning practitioners, how uncertain, small, or empty reference annotations require a rethinking of the evaluation and optimizing procedures. The evaluation code was released to encourage further analysis of this topic. https://github.com/SophieOstmeier/UncertainSmallEmpty.git

eess.IV↗

arXiv2022

Non-inferiority of Deep Learning Acute Ischemic Stroke Segmentation on Non-Contrast CT Compared to Expert Neuroradiologists

To determine if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected the ischemic core on each scan. The neuroradiologist with the most experience (expert A) served as the ground truth for deep learning model training. Two additional neuroradiologists (experts B and C) segmentations were used for data testing. The 232 studies were randomly split into training and test sets. The training set was further randomly divided into 5 folds with training and validation sets. A 3-dimensional CNN architecture was trained and optimized to predict the segmentations of expert A from NCCT. The performance of the model was assessed using a set of volume, overlap, and distance metrics using non-inferiority thresholds of 20%, 3ml, and 3mm. The optimized model trained on expert A was compared to test experts B and C. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for the non-inferiority of the model-expert compared to the inter-expert agreement. The final model performance for the ischemic core segmentation task reached a performance of 0.46+-0.09 Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm and 0.47+-0.13 Dice when trained on expert A. Compared to the two test neuroradiologists the model-expert agreement was non-inferior to the inter-expert agreement, p < 0.05. The CNN accurately delineates the hypodense ischemic core on NCCT in acute ischemic stroke patients with an accuracy comparable to neuroradiologists.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2020

Improved Segmentation and Detection Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted Brain Infarct Lesions with Synthetically Enhanced Deep Learning

Purpose: To compare the segmentation and detection performance of a deep learning model trained on a database of human-labelled clinical diffusion-weighted (DW) stroke lesions to a model trained on the same database enhanced with synthetic DW stroke lesions. Methods: In this institutional review board approved study, a stroke database of 962 cases (mean age 65+/-17 years, 255 males, 449 scans with DW positive stroke lesions) and a normal database of 2,027 patients (mean age 38+/-24 years,1088 females) were obtained. Brain volumes with synthetic DW stroke lesions were produced by warping the relative signal increase of real strokes to normal brain volumes. A generic 3D U-Net was trained on four different databases to generate four different models: (a) 375 neuroradiologist-labeled clinical DW positive stroke cases(CDB);(b) 2,000 synthetic cases(S2DB);(c) CDB+2,000 synthetic cases(CS2DB); or (d) CDB+40,000 synthetic cases(CS40DB). The models were tested on 20%(n=192) of the cases of the stroke database, which were excluded from the training set. Segmentation accuracy was characterized using Dice score and lesion volume of the stroke segmentation, and statistical significance was tested using a paired, two-tailed, Student's t-test. Detection sensitivity and specificity was compared to three neuroradiologists. Results: The performance of the 3D U-Net model trained on the CS40DB(mean Dice 0.72) was better than models trained on the CS2DB (0.70,P <0.001) or the CDB(0.65,P<0.001). The deep learning model was also more sensitive (91%[89%-93%]) than each of the three human readers(84%[81%-87%],78%[75%-81%],and 79%[76%-82%]), but less specific(75%[72%-78%] vs for the three human readers (96%[94%-97%],92%[90%-94%] and 89%[86%-91%]). Conclusion: Deep learning training for segmentation and detection of DW stroke lesions was significantly improved by enhancing the training set with synthetic lesions.

physics.med-ph↗