arXiv subjects

Soroush Ebadian

Publications and source records attributed to Soroush Ebadian.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Proportional Fairness for Harmful Decisions

We study allocation of (divisible) public bads, where agents incur costs for alternatives and the goal is to pick a lottery over the alternatives. We show that the traditional definitions of the core, a central criterion of proportional representation for allocation of public goods, private goods, and private bads (chores), do not make sense for allocation of public bads. We introduce two formalizations of the core tailored to public bads. Under a structural condition which subsumes allocation of private bads, we show that zero-respecting Lindahl equilibria satisfy both formalizations, exhibit additional fairness guarantees, and strictly generalize competitive equilibria from equal incomes (CEEI) for allocation of private bads. Without this structural condition, we show that Lindahl equilibria exhibit undesirable behaviors, prove sharp impossibility results separating public bads from public goods, but show that a rule using a reduction to public goods recovers one of our formalizations of the core. Our results lay the groundwork for studying fair allocation of public bads, an overlooked yet fundamental problem, and highlight several structural and algorithmic directions that remain open.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Policy Aggregation

We consider the challenge of AI value alignment with multiple individuals that have different reward functions and optimal policies in an underlying Markov decision process. We formalize this problem as one of policy aggregation, where the goal is to identify a desirable collective policy. We argue that an approach informed by social choice theory is especially suitable. Our key insight is that social choice methods can be reinterpreted by identifying ordinal preferences with volumes of subsets of the state-action occupancy polytope. Building on this insight, we demonstrate that a variety of methods--including approval voting, Borda count, the proportional veto core, and quantile fairness--can be practically applied to policy aggregation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Constrained Fair and Efficient Allocations

Fairness and efficiency have become the pillars of modern fair division research, but prior work on achieving both simultaneously is largely limited to the unconstrained setting. We study fair and efficient allocations of indivisible goods under additive valuations and various types of allocation feasibility constraints, and demonstrate the unreasonable effectiveness of the maximum Nash welfare (MNW) solution in this previously uncharted territory. Our main result is that MNW allocations are 1/2-envy-free up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimal under the broad family of (arbitrary) matroid constraints. We extend these guarantees to complete MNW allocations for base-orderable matroid constraints, and to a family of non-matroidal constraints (which includes balancedness) using a novel "alternate worlds" technique. We establish tightness of our results by providing counterexamples for the satisfiability of certain stronger desiderata, but show an improved result for the special case of goods with copies (Gafni et al. 2023). Finally, we also establish novel best-of-both-worlds guarantees for goods with copies and balancedness.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Fair Division with Market Values

We introduce a model of fair division with market values, where indivisible goods must be partitioned among agents with (additive) subjective valuations, and each good additionally has a market value. The market valuation can be viewed as a separate additive valuation that holds identically across all the agents. We seek allocations that are simultaneously fair with respect to the subjective valuations and with respect to the market valuation. We show that an allocation that satisfies stochastically-dominant envy-freeness up to one good (SD-EF1) with respect to both the subjective valuations and the market valuation does not always exist, but the weaker guarantee of EF1 with respect to the subjective valuations along with SD-EF1 with respect to the market valuation can be guaranteed. We also study a number of other guarantees such as Pareto optimality, EFX, and MMS. In addition, we explore non-additive valuations and extend our model to cake-cutting. Along the way, we identify several tantalizing open questions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Temporal Fair Division

We study temporal fair division, whereby a set of agents are allocated a (possibly different) set of goods on each day for a period of days. We study this setting, as well as a number of its special cases formed by the restrictions to two agents, same goods on each day, identical preferences, or combinations thereof, and chart out the landscape of achieving two types of fairness guarantees simultaneously: fairness on each day (per day) and fairness over time (up to each day, or the weaker version, overall). In the most general setting, we prove that there always exists an allocation that is stochastically-dominant envy-free up to one good (SD-EF1) per day and proportional up to one good (PROP1) overall, and when all the agents have identical preferences, we show that SD-EF1 per day and SD-EF1 overall can be guaranteed. For the case of two agents, we prove that SD-EF1 per day and EF1 up to each day can be guaranteed using an envy balancing technique. We provide counterexamples for other combinations that establish our results as among the best guarantees possible, but also leaving open some tantalizing questions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Harm Ratio: A Novel and Versatile Fairness Criterion

Envy-freeness has become the cornerstone of fair division research. In settings where each individual is allocated a disjoint share of collective resources, it is a compelling fairness axiom which demands that no individual strictly prefer the allocation of another individual to their own. Unfortunately, in many real-life collective decision-making problems, the goal is to choose a (common) public outcome that is equally applicable to all individuals, and the notion of envy becomes vacuous. Consequently, this literature has avoided studying fairness criteria that focus on individuals feeling a sense of jealousy or resentment towards other individuals (rather than towards the system), missing out on a key aspect of fairness. In this work, we propose a novel fairness criterion, individual harm ratio, which is inspired by envy-freeness but applies to a broad range of collective decision-making settings. Theoretically, we identify minimal conditions under which this criterion and its groupwise extensions can be guaranteed, and study the computational complexity of related problems. Empirically, we conduct experiments with real data to show that our fairness criterion is powerful enough to differentiate between prominent decision-making algorithms for a range of tasks from voting and fair division to participatory budgeting and peer review.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Boosting Sortition via Proportional Representation

Sortition is based on the idea of choosing randomly selected representatives for decision making. The main properties that make sortition particularly appealing are fairness -- all the citizens can be selected with the same probability -- and proportional representation -- a randomly selected panel probably reflects the composition of the whole population. When a population lies on a representation metric, we formally define proportional representation by using a notion called the core. A panel is in the core if no group of individuals is underrepresented proportional to its size. While uniform selection is fair, it does not always return panels that are in the core. Thus, we ask if we can design a selection algorithm that satisfies fairness and ex post core simultaneously. We answer this question affirmatively and present an efficient selection algorithm that is fair and provides a constant-factor approximation to the optimal ex post core. Moreover, we show that uniformly random selection satisfies a constant-factor approximation to the optimal ex ante core. We complement our theoretical results by conducting experiments with real data.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Optimized Distortion and Proportional Fairness in Voting

A voting rule decides on a probability distribution over a set of m alternatives, based on rankings of those alternatives provided by agents. We assume that agents have cardinal utility functions over the alternatives, but voting rules have access to only the rankings induced by these utilities. We evaluate how well voting rules do on measures of social welfare and of proportional fairness, computed based on the hidden utility functions. In particular, we study the distortion of voting rules, which is a worst-case measure. It is an approximation ratio comparing the utilitarian social welfare of the optimum outcome to the social welfare produced by the outcome selected by the voting rule, in the worst case over possible input profiles and utility functions that are consistent with the input. The previous literature has studied distortion with unit-sum utility functions (which are normalized to sum to 1), and left a small asymptotic gap in the best possible distortion. Using tools from the theory of fair multi-winner elections, we propose the first voting rule which achieves the optimal distortion $Θ(\sqrt{m})$ for unit-sum utilities. Our voting rule also achieves optimum $Θ(\sqrt{m})$ distortion for a larger class of utilities, including unit-range and approval (0/1) utilities. We then take a worst-case approach to a quantitative measure of the fairness of a voting rule, called proportional fairness. Informally, it measures whether the influence of cohesive groups of agents on the voting outcome is proportional to the group size. We show that there is a voting rule which, without knowledge of the utilities, can achieve a $Θ(\log m)$-approximation to proportional fairness, and thus also to Nash welfare and to the core, making it interesting for applications in participatory budgeting. For all three approximations, we show that $Θ(\log m)$ is the best possible.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

How to Fairly Allocate Easy and Difficult Chores

A major open question in fair allocation of indivisible items is whether there always exists an allocation of chores that is Pareto optimal (PO) and envy-free up to one item (EF1). We answer this question affirmatively for the natural class of bivalued utilities, where each agent partitions the chores into easy and difficult ones, and has cost $p > 1$ for chores that are difficult for her and cost $1$ for chores that are easy for her. Such an allocation can be found in polynomial time using an algorithm based on the Fisher market. We also show that for a slightly broader class of utilities, where each agent $i$ can have a potentially different integer $p_i$, an allocation that is maximin share fair (MMS) always exists and can be computed in polynomial time, provided that each $p_i$ is an integer. Our MMS arguments also hold when allocating goods instead of chores, and extend to another natural class of utilities, namely weakly lexicographic utilities.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Fast Algorithm for K-Truss Discovery on Public-Private Graphs

In public-private graphs, users share one public graph and have their own private graphs. A private graph consists of personal private contacts that only can be visible to its owner, e.g., hidden friend lists on Facebook and secret following on Sina Weibo. However, existing public-private analytic algorithms have not yet investigated the dense subgraph discovery of k-truss, where each edge is contained in at least k-2 triangles. This paper aims at finding k-truss efficiently in public-private graphs. The core of our solution is a novel algorithm to update k-truss with node insertions. We develop a classification-based hybrid strategy of node insertions and edge insertions to incrementally compute k-truss in public-private graphs. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our proposed algorithms against state-of-the-art methods on real-world datasets.

cs.DB↗