arXiv subjects

Sougata Mukherjea

Publications and source records attributed to Sougata Mukherjea.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Optimizing Cloud Deployment: Blending of IaaS and FaaS for Microservice Architecture

The rapid evolution of cloud computing has resulted in the adoption of hybrid deployments that blend Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) and Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) service models to optimize resource utilization, scalability, and operational efficiency. This paper presents a comprehensive study and practical implementation of a metrics-driven approach for migrating microservices from a traditional IaaS service model to a hybrid IaaS + FaaS model, using two microservice applications as case studies. The research develops an automated framework to analyze service-level performance metrics to identify microservices that are best suited for serverless execution. The findings of our research highlight the benefits and limitations of different cloud service models and provide a scalable and replicable automated methodology for optimized deployment of cloud-native applications.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

InteractiveGNNExplainer: A Visual Analytics Framework for Multi-Faceted Understanding and Probing of Graph Neural Network Predictions

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel in graph-based learning tasks, but their complex, non-linear operations often render them as opaque "black boxes". This opacity hinders user trust, complicates debugging, bias detection, and adoption in critical domains requiring explainability. This paper introduces InteractiveGNNExplainer, a visual analytics framework to enhance GNN explainability, focusing on node classification. Our system uniquely integrates coordinated interactive views (dynamic graph layouts, embedding projections, feature inspection, neighborhood analysis) with established post-hoc (GNNExplainer) and intrinsic (GAT attention) explanation techniques. Crucially, it incorporates interactive graph editing, allowing users to perform a "what-if" analysis by perturbing graph structures and observing immediate impacts on GNN predictions and explanations. We detail the system architecture and, through case studies on Cora and CiteSeer datasets, demonstrate how InteractiveGNNExplainer facilitates in-depth misclassification diagnosis, comparative analysis of GCN versus GAT behaviors, and rigorous probing of model sensitivity. These capabilities foster a deeper, multifaceted understanding of GNN predictions, contributing to more transparent, trustworthy, and robust graph analysis.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating LLMs for Visualization Generation and Understanding

Information Visualization has been utilized to gain insights from complex data. In recent times, Large Language models (LLMs) have performed very well in many tasks. In this paper, we showcase the capabilities of different popular LLMs to generate code for visualization based on simple prompts. We also analyze the power of LLMs to understand some common visualizations by answering questions. Our study shows that LLMs could generate code for some simpler visualizations such as bar and pie charts. Moreover, they could answer simple questions about visualizations. However, LLMs also have several limitations. For example, some of them had difficulty generating complex visualizations, such as violin plot. LLMs also made errors in answering some questions about visualizations, for example, identifying relationships between close boundaries and determining lengths of shapes. We believe that our insights can be used to improve both LLMs and Information Visualization systems.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating LLMs for Visualization Tasks

Information Visualization has been utilized to gain insights from complex data. In recent times, Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed very well in many tasks. In this paper, we showcase the capabilities of different popular LLMs to generate code for visualization based on simple prompts. We also analyze the power of LLMs to understand some common visualizations by answering simple questions. Our study shows that LLMs could generate code for some visualizations as well as answer questions about them. However, LLMs also have several limitations. We believe that our insights can be used to improve both LLMs and Information Visualization systems.

cs.SE↗