arXiv subjects

Stéphane Devismes

Publications and source records attributed to Stéphane Devismes.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Can Like Attract Like? A Study of Homonymous Gathering in Networks

A team of mobile agents, starting from distinct nodes of a network, have to meet at the same node and declare that they all met. Agents execute the same algorithm, which they start when activated by an adversary or by an agent entering their initial node. When activated, agents traverse edges of the network in synchronous rounds. Their perception and communication are strictly local. This task, known as gathering, is a central problem in distributed mobile systems. Most prior work focuses on minimizing its time complexity, i.e., the worst-case number of rounds between the start of the earliest agent and the task completion. To break possible symmetries, deterministic solutions typically assume that agents have pairwise distinct IDs, called labels, known only to themselves. But must all labels be pairwise distinct to guarantee deterministic gathering? We address this question by considering agents that may share the same label. A team L is said to be gatherable if, for every initial setting of L, there is an algorithm that solves gathering. Our contribution is threefold. (1) We give a full characterization of the gatherable teams. (2) We design an algorithm that gathers all of them in poly$(n,\logλ)$ time, where $n$ (resp. $λ$) is the graph order (resp. the smallest label in L). This algorithm requires the agents to initially share only $O(\log \log \log μ)$ bits of common knowledge, where $μ$ is the largest label multiplicity in L. (3) We show this dependency is almost optimal to get a poly$(n,\logλ)$-time complexity. As a by-product, we get the first deterministic poly$(n,\logλ)$-time algorithm requiring no common knowledge to gather any team when all labels are distinct. Known to be achievable for two-agent teams, extending this to any team size faced a major challenge: termination detection. Our techniques to address it may be of independent interest.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Graph Exploration: The Impact of a Distance Constraint

A mobile agent, starting from a node $s$ of a simple undirected connected graph $G=(V,E)$, has to explore all nodes and edges of $G$ using the minimum number of edge traversals. To do so, the agent uses a deterministic algorithm that allows it to gain information on $G$ as it traverses its edges. During its exploration, the agent must always respect the constraint of knowing a path of length at most $D$ to go back to node $s$. The upper bound $D$ is fixed as being equal to $(1+α)r$, where $r$ is the eccentricity of node $s$ (i.e., the maximum distance from $s$ to any other node) and $α$ is any positive real constant. This task has been introduced by Duncan et al. [ACM Trans. Algorithms 2006] and is known as \emph{distance-constrained exploration}. The \emph{penalty} of an exploration algorithm running in $G$ is the number of edge traversals made by the agent in excess of $|E|$. Panaite and Pelc [J. Algorithms 1999] gave an algorithm for solving exploration without any constraint on the moves that is guaranteed to work in every graph $G$ with a (small) penalty in $\mathcal{O}(|V|)$. Hence, a natural question is whether we could obtain a distance-constrained exploration algorithm with the same guarantee as well. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to this question. We also observe that an algorithm working in every graph $G$ with a linear penalty in $|V|$ cannot be obtained for the task of \emph{fuel-constrained exploration}, another variant studied in the literature. This solves an open problem posed by Duncan et al. [ACM Trans. Algorithms 2006] and shows a fundamental separation with the task of exploration without constraint on the moves.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Trade-off between Time, Space, and Workload: the case of the Self-stabilizing Unison

We present a self-stabilizing algorithm for the (asynchronous) unison problem which achieves an efficient trade-off between time, workload, and space in a weak model. Precisely, our algorithm is defined in the atomic-state model and works in anonymous networks in which even local ports are unlabeled. It makes no assumption on the daemon and thus stabilizes under the weakest one: the distributed unfair daemon. In a $n$-node network of diameter $D$ and assuming a period $B \geq 2D+2$, our algorithm only requires $O(\log B)$ bits per node to achieve full polynomiality as it stabilizes in at most $2D-2$ rounds and $O(\min(n^2B, n^3))$ moves. In particular and to the best of our knowledge, it is the first self-stabilizing unison for arbitrary anonymous networks achieving an asymptotically optimal stabilization time in rounds using a bounded memory at each node. Finally, we show that our solution allows to efficiently simulate synchronous self-stabilizing algorithms in an asynchronous environment. This provides a new state-of-the-art algorithm solving both the leader election and the spanning tree construction problem in any identified connected network which, to the best of our knowledge, beat all existing solutions of the literature.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Making local algorithms efficiently self-stabilizing in arbitrary asynchronous environments

This paper deals with the trade-off between time, workload, and versatility in self-stabilization, a general and lightweight fault-tolerant concept in distributed computing.In this context, we propose a transformer that provides an asynchronous silent self-stabilizing version Trans(AlgI) of any terminating synchronous algorithm AlgI. The transformed algorithm Trans(AlgI) works under the distributed unfair daemon and is efficient both in moves and rounds.Our transformer allows to easily obtain fully-polynomial silent self-stabilizing solutions that are also asymptotically optimal in rounds.We illustrate the efficiency and versatility of our transformer with several efficient (i.e., fully-polynomial) silent self-stabilizing instances solving major distributed computing problems, namely vertex coloring, Breadth-First Search (BFS) spanning tree construction, k-clustering, and leader election.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2019

Analysis of a Memory-Efficient Self-Stabilizing BFS Spanning Tree

We present results on the last topic we collaborate with our late friend, Professor Ajoy Kumar Datta (1958-2019). In this work, we shed new light on a self-stabilizing wave algorithm proposed by Colette Johnen in 1997. This algorithm constructs a BFS spanning tree in any connected rooted network. Nowadays, it is still the best existing self-stabilizing BFS spanning tree construction in terms of memory requirement, {\em i.e.}, it only requires $Θ(1)$ bits per edge. However, it has been proven assuming a weakly fair daemon. Moreover, its stabilization time was unknown. Here, we study the slightly modified version of this algorithm, still keeping the same memory requirement. We prove the self-stabilization of this variant under the distributed unfair daemon and show a stabilization time in $O(D.n^2)$ rounds, where $D$ is the network diameter and $n$ the number of processes.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2019

Self-Stabilizing Distributed Cooperative Reset

Self-stabilization is a versatile fault-tolerance approach that characterizes the ability of a system to eventually resume a correct behavior after any finite number of transient faults. In this paper, we propose a self-stabilizing reset algorithm working in anonymous networks. This algorithm resets the network in a distributed non-centralized manner, i.e., it is multi-initiator, as each process detecting an inconsistency may initiate a reset. It is also cooperative in the sense that it coordinates concurrent reset executions in order to gain efficiency. Our approach is general since our reset algorithm allows to build self-stabilizing solutions for various problems and settings. As a matter of facts, we show that it applies to both static and dynamic specifications since we propose efficient self-stabilizing reset-based algorithms for the (1-minimal) $f,g)-alliance (a generalization of the dominating set problem) in identified networks and the unison problem in anonymous networks. Notice that these two latter instantiations enhance the state of the art. Indeed, in the former case, our solution is more general than the previous ones; while in the latter case, the complexity of the proposed unison algorithm is better than that of previous solutions of the literature.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2018

Acyclic Strategy for Silent Self-Stabilization in Spanning Forests

In this paper, we formalize design patterns, commonly used in the self-stabilizing area, to obtain general statements regarding both correctness and time complexity guarantees. Precisely, we study a general class of algorithms designed for networks endowed with a sense of direction describing a spanning forest (e.g., a directed tree or a network where a directed spanning tree is available) whose characterization is a simple (i.e., quasi-syntactic) condition. We show that any algorithm of this class is (1) silent and self-stabilizing under the distributed unfair daemon, and (2) has a stabilization time which is polynomial in moves and asymptotically optimal in rounds. To illustrate the versatility of our method, we review several existing works where our results apply.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2017

Self-Stabilizing Disconnected Components Detection and Rooted Shortest-Path Tree Maintenance in Polynomial Steps

We deal with the problem of maintaining a shortest-path tree rooted at some process r in a network that may be disconnected after topological changes. The goal is then to maintain a shortest-path tree rooted at r in its connected component, V\_r, and make all processes of other components detecting that r is not part of their connected component. We propose, in the composite atomicity model, a silent self-stabilizing algorithm for this problem working in semi-anonymous networks, where edges have strictly positive weights. This algorithm does not require any a priori knowledge about global parameters of the network. We prove its correctness assuming the distributed unfair daemon, the most general daemon. Its stabilization time in rounds is at most 3nmax+D, where nmax is the maximum number of non-root processes in a connected component and D is the hop-diameter of V\_r. Furthermore, if we additionally assume that edge weights are positive integers, then it stabilizes in a polynomial number of steps: namely, we exhibit a bound in O(maxi nmax^3 n), where maxi is the maximum weight of an edge and n is the number of processes.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2015

Silent Self-stabilizing BFS Tree Algorithms Revised

In this paper, we revisit two fundamental results of the self-stabilizing literature about silent BFS spanning tree constructions: the Dolev et al algorithm and the Huang and Chen's algorithm. More precisely, we propose in the composite atomicity model three straightforward adaptations inspired from those algorithms. We then present a deep study of these three algorithms. Our results are related to both correctness (convergence and closure, assuming a distributed unfair daemon) and complexity (analysis of the stabilization time in terms of rounds and steps).

cs.DC↗

arXiv2012

Optimal grid exploration by asynchronous oblivious robots

We consider a team of {\em autonomous weak robots} that are endowed with visibility sensors and motion actuators. Autonomous means that the team cannot rely on any kind of central coordination mechanism or scheduler. By weak we mean that the robots are devoid of (1) any (observable) IDs allowing to differentiate them (anonymous), (2) means of communication allowing them to communicate directly, and (3) any way to remember any previous observation nor computation performed in any previous step (oblivious). Robots asynchronously operate in cycles of three phases: Look, Compute, and Move. Furthermore, the network is an anonymous unoriented grid. In such settings, the robots must collaborate to solve a collective task, here the terminating grid exploration (exploration for short), despite being limited with respect to input from the environment, asymmetry, memory, etc. Exploration requires that robots explore the grid and stop when the task is complete. We propose optimal (w.r.t. the number of robots) solutions for the deterministic terminating exploration of a grid shaped network by a team of $k$ asynchronous oblivious robots in the fully asynchronous and non-atomic model, so called CORDA. In more details, we first assume the ATOM model in which each Look-Compute-Move cycle execution is executed atomically, ie every robot that is activated at instant t instantaneously executes a full cycle between t and t+1. ATOM being strictly stronger than CORDA, all impossibility results in ATOM also hold in CORDA. We show that it is impossible to explore a grid of at least three nodes with less than three robots in ATOM. (This first result holds for both deterministic and probabilistic settings.) Next, we show that it is impossible to deterministically explore a (2,2)-Grid with less than 4 robots, and a (3,3)-Grid with less than 5 robots, respectively. Then, we propose deterministic algorithms in CORDA to exhibit the optimal number of robots allowing to explore of a given grid. Our results show that except in two particular cases, 3 robots are necessary and sufficient to deterministically explore a grid of at least three nodes. The optimal number of robots for the two remaining cases is: 4 for the (2,2)-Grid and 5 for the (3,3)-Grid.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2010

Algorithms For Extracting Timeliness Graphs

We consider asynchronous message-passing systems in which some links are timely and processes may crash. Each run defines a timeliness graph among correct processes: (p; q) is an edge of the timeliness graph if the link from p to q is timely (that is, there is bound on communication delays from p to q). The main goal of this paper is to approximate this timeliness graph by graphs having some properties (such as being trees, rings, ...). Given a family S of graphs, for runs such that the timeliness graph contains at least one graph in S then using an extraction algorithm, each correct process has to converge to the same graph in S that is, in a precise sense, an approximation of the timeliness graph of the run. For example, if the timeliness graph contains a ring, then using an extraction algorithm, all correct processes eventually converge to the same ring and in this ring all nodes will be correct processes and all links will be timely. We first present a general extraction algorithm and then a more specific extraction algorithm that is communication efficient (i.e., eventually all the messages of the extraction algorithm use only links of the extracted graph).

cs.DC↗

arXiv2009

Self-stabilizing K-out-of-L exclusion on tree network

In this paper, we address the problem of K-out-of-L exclusion, a generalization of the mutual exclusion problem, in which there are $\ell$ units of a shared resource, and any process can request up to $\mathtt k$ units ($1\leq\mathtt k\leq\ell$). We propose the first deterministic self-stabilizing distributed K-out-of-L exclusion protocol in message-passing systems for asynchronous oriented tree networks which assumes bounded local memory for each process.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2009

Optimal Probabilistic Ring Exploration by Asynchronous Oblivious Robots

We consider a team of $k$ identical, oblivious, asynchronous mobile robots that are able to sense (\emph{i.e.}, view) their environment, yet are unable to communicate, and evolve on a constrained path. Previous results in this weak scenario show that initial symmetry yields high lower bounds when problems are to be solved by \emph{deterministic} robots. In this paper, we initiate research on probabilistic bounds and solutions in this context, and focus on the \emph{exploration} problem of anonymous unoriented rings of any size. It is known that $Θ(\log n)$ robots are necessary and sufficient to solve the problem with $k$ deterministic robots, provided that $k$ and $n$ are coprime. By contrast, we show that \emph{four} identical probabilistic robots are necessary and sufficient to solve the same problem, also removing the coprime constraint. Our positive results are constructive.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2008

Communication Efficiency in Self-stabilizing Silent Protocols

Self-stabilization is a general paradigm to provide forward recovery capabilities to distributed systems and networks. Intuitively, a protocol is self-stabilizing if it is able to recover without external intervention from any catastrophic transient failure. In this paper, our focus is to lower the communication complexity of self-stabilizing protocols \emph{below} the need of checking every neighbor forever. In more details, the contribution of the paper is threefold: (i) We provide new complexity measures for communication efficiency of self-stabilizing protocols, especially in the stabilized phase or when there are no faults, (ii) On the negative side, we show that for non-trivial problems such as coloring, maximal matching, and maximal independent set, it is impossible to get (deterministic or probabilistic) self-stabilizing solutions where every participant communicates with less than every neighbor in the stabilized phase, and (iii) On the positive side, we present protocols for coloring, maximal matching, and maximal independent set such that a fraction of the participants communicates with exactly one neighbor in the stabilized phase.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2008

Bounds for self-stabilization in unidirectional networks

A distributed algorithm is self-stabilizing if after faults and attacks hit the system and place it in some arbitrary global state, the systems recovers from this catastrophic situation without external intervention in finite time. Unidirectional networks preclude many common techniques in self-stabilization from being used, such as preserving local predicates. In this paper, we investigate the intrinsic complexity of achieving self-stabilization in unidirectional networks, and focus on the classical vertex coloring problem. When deterministic solutions are considered, we prove a lower bound of $n$ states per process (where $n$ is the network size) and a recovery time of at least $n(n-1)/2$ actions in total. We present a deterministic algorithm with matching upper bounds that performs in arbitrary graphs. When probabilistic solutions are considered, we observe that at least $Δ+ 1$ states per process and a recovery time of $Ω(n)$ actions in total are required (where $Δ$ denotes the maximal degree of the underlying simple undirected graph). We present a probabilistically self-stabilizing algorithm that uses $\mathtt{k}$ states per process, where $\mathtt{k}$ is a parameter of the algorithm. When $\mathtt{k}=Δ+1$, the algorithm recovers in expected $O(Δn)$ actions. When $\mathtt{k}$ may grow arbitrarily, the algorithm recovers in expected O(n) actions in total. Thus, our algorithm can be made optimal with respect to space or time complexity.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2008

Snap-Stabilization in Message-Passing Systems

In this paper, we tackle the open problem of snap-stabilization in message-passing systems. Snap-stabilization is a nice approach to design protocols that withstand transient faults. Compared to the well-known self-stabilizing approach, snap-stabilization guarantees that the effect of faults is contained immediately after faults cease to occur. Our contribution is twofold: we show that (1) snap-stabilization is impossible for a wide class of problems if we consider networks with finite yet unbounded channel capacity; (2) snap-stabilization becomes possible in the same setting if we assume bounded-capacity channels. We propose three snap-stabilizing protocols working in fully-connected networks. Our work opens exciting new research perspectives, as it enables the snap-stabilizing paradigm to be implemented in actual networks.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2007

Weak vs. Self vs. Probabilistic Stabilization

Self-stabilization is a strong property that guarantees that a network always resume correct behavior starting from an arbitrary initial state. Weaker guarantees have later been introduced to cope with impossibility results: probabilistic stabilization only gives probabilistic convergence to a correct behavior. Also, weak stabilization only gives the possibility of convergence. In this paper, we investigate the relative power of weak, self, and probabilistic stabilization, with respect to the set of problems that can be solved. We formally prove that in that sense, weak stabilization is strictly stronger that self-stabilization. Also, we refine previous results on weak stabilization to prove that, for practical schedule instances, a deterministic weak-stabilizing protocol can be turned into a probabilistic self-stabilizing one. This latter result hints at more practical use of weak-stabilization, as such algorthms are easier to design and prove than their (probabilistic) self-stabilizing counterparts.

cs.DC↗