Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Stéphane Guerrier

Publications and source records attributed to Stéphane Guerrier.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Births are difficult to predict even with rich survey and full-population register data

Major life events have proven difficult to predict. Does this reflect limits of theory, data, and algorithms, or the large role of chance? We examine one outcome - having a child within three years - through a near-ideal setting for prediction: a data challenge where 147 researchers predicted births for Dutch residents aged 18-45, using survey data and full-population registers. Methods ranged from logistic regression to a large language model and transformers. Predictions were moderately accurate (best F1: register 0.59, survey 0.76); advanced models did not outperform classical ones; and the larger registers did not beat the survey. Simulating the stochastic biology of conception and pregnancy, we estimated a predictive ceiling (survey F1 ~ 0.86-0.94, register 0.88-0.96). Observed performance falls short of this ceiling, implicating imperfect data, methods, and unmodelled chance, while the ceiling itself shows that chance in reproduction alone sets a non-trivial limit on predicting individual lives.

cs.LG↗

Calibrated Estimation and Inference for Semiparametric Regression Models

We consider a broad class of semiparametric regression models in which the conditional distribution of the response takes the form $f\{Y|\boldsymbol{x}^T\boldsymbolβ+m(z),ϕ\}$, known up to a parametric component $\boldsymbolβ$ of diverging dimension $p$, a smooth function $m(\cdot)$, and a dispersion parameter $ϕ$. The existing literature on such models has focused on semiparametric efficiency for $\boldsymbolβ$, treating $ϕ$ and $m(\cdot)$ as nuisances and largely ignoring finite-sample bias. Yet this bias can be substantial, particularly when $p$ is large relative to $n$ or the dispersion is high, and it can seriously undermine inference for $\boldsymbolβ$; moreover, $ϕ$ is often of direct scientific interest. We therefore propose SABRE, a general calibration framework for semiparametric estimation and inference, which calibrates an initial estimator against its model-implied expectation under a tractable parametric approximation to the semiparametric model. For generalized partially linear models, we show that SABRE reduces the bias of both $\boldsymbolβ$ and $ϕ$, accommodates a diverging parameter dimension without sparsity, and preserves the first-order variance and semiparametric efficiency of the initial estimator; the joint construction also improves estimation and inference for $m(\cdot)$. Simulation studies and an application to Alzheimer's disease genetics association analysis demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of SABRE in reducing bias and improving inference.

stat.ME↗

Towards Open Science: Monitoring Crustal Deformations in North America

The study of the Earth's behavior has greatly benefited from the widespread deployment of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), enabling large-scale monitoring of crustal deformation and long-term geophysical trends. In this work, we focus on the North American region, where complex tectonic activity, particularly along the western margin, requires methods capable of processing and analyzing large collections of GNSS time series distributed across extensive spatial domains. Analyzing the full GNSS network provides a coherent view of deformation across multiple scales, allowing detection of long-wavelength signals, subtle intraplate strain and regionally consistent velocity fields that are difficult to capture through local or subsampled analyses. Despite the availability of such data, existing methodologies remain computationally prohibitive for large-scale analyses across this region (or others). To address this limitation, we introduce a highly scalable framework (implemented in open-source software) that enables inference on crustal deformation across the full North American GNSS network using standard computational resources. The proposed method achieves substantial computational gains while maintaining inferential performance comparable to existing approaches and confirms existing tectonic trends, thereby supporting efficient large-scale monitoring and contributing to ongoing efforts toward "Open Science".

physics.geo-ph↗

Equivalence Testing Under Privacy Constraints

Protecting individual privacy is essential across research domains, from socio-economic surveys to big-tech user data. This need is particularly acute in healthcare, where analyses often involve sensitive patient information. A typical example is comparing treatment efficacy across hospitals or ensuring consistency in diagnostic laboratory calibrations, both requiring privacy-preserving statistical procedures. However, standard equivalence testing procedures for differences in proportions or means, commonly used to assess average equivalence, can inadvertently disclose sensitive information. To address this problem, we develop differentially private equivalence testing procedures that rely on simulation-based calibration, as the finite-sample distribution is analytically intractable. Our approach introduces a unified framework, termed DP-TOST, for conducting differentially private equivalence testing of both means and proportions. Through numerical simulations and real-world applications, we demonstrate that the proposed method maintains type-I error control at the nominal level and achieves power comparable to its non-private counterpart as the privacy budget and/or sample size increases, while ensuring strong privacy guarantees. These findings establish a reliable and practical framework for privacy-preserving equivalence testing in high-stakes fields such as healthcare, among others.

stat.AP↗

Bridging the gap between experimental burden and statistical power for quantiles equivalence testing

Testing the equivalence of multiple quantiles between two populations is important in many scientific applications, such as clinical trials, where conventional mean-based methods may be inadequate. This is particularly relevant in bridging studies that compare drug responses across different experimental conditions or patient populations. These studies often aim to assess whether a proposed dose for a target population achieves pharmacokinetic levels comparable to those of a reference population where efficacy and safety have been established. The focus is on extreme quantiles which directly inform both efficacy and safety assessments. When analyzing heterogeneous Gaussian samples, where a single quantile of interest is estimated, the existing Two One-Sided Tests method for quantile equivalence testing (qTOST) tends to be overly conservative. To mitigate this behavior, we introduce $α$-qTOST, a finite-sample adjustment that achieves uniformly higher power compared to qTOST while maintaining the test size at the nominal level. Moreover, we extend the quantile equivalence framework to simultaneously assess equivalence across multiple quantiles. Through theoretical guarantees and an extensive simulation study, we demonstrate that $α$-qTOST offers substantial improvements, especially when testing extreme quantiles under heteroskedasticity and with small, unbalanced sample sizes. We illustrate these advantages through two case studies, one in HIV drug development, where a bridging clinical trial examines exposure distributions between male and female populations with unbalanced sample sizes, and another in assessing the reproducibility of an identical experimental protocol performed by different operators for generating biodistribution profiles of topically administered and locally acting products.

stat.ME↗

Bioequivalence Assessment for Locally Acting Drugs: A Framework for Feasible and Efficient Evaluation

Equivalence testing plays a key role in several domains, such as the development of generic medical products, which are therapeutically equivalent to brand-name drugs but with reduced cost and increased accessibility. Promoting access to generics is a critical public health issue with substantial societal implications, but establishing equivalence is particularly challenging in multivariate settings. A notable example refers to locally acting drugs designed to exert their therapeutic effects at a localized area where they are administered rather than being absorbed into the bloodstream, where complex experimental protocols lead to reduced sample sizes and substantial experimental noise. Traditional approaches, such as the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST), cannot adequately tackle the complex multivariate nature of such data. In this work, we develop an adjustment for the TOST procedure by simultaneously correcting its significance level and equivalence margins to ensure control of the test size and increase its power. In large samples, this approach leads to an optimal adjustment for the univariate TOST procedure. In multivariate settings, where we show that an optimal adjustment does not exist, our proposal maintains equal marginal test sizes and overall size control while maximizing power in important cases. Through extensive simulation studies and a case study on multivariate bioequivalence assessment for two antifungal topical products, we demonstrate the superior performance of our method across various scenarios encountered in practice.

stat.ME↗

Global p-Values in Multi-Design Studies

Replicability issues -- referring to the difficulty or failure of independent researchers to corroborate the results of published studies -- have hindered the meaningful progression of science and eroded public trust in scientific findings. In response to the replicability crisis, one approach is the use of multi-design studies, which incorporate multiple analysis strategies to address a single research question. However, there remains a lack of methods for effectively combining outcomes in multi-design studies. In this paper, we propose a unified framework based on the g-value, for global p-value, which enables meaningful aggregation of outcomes from all the considered analysis strategies in multi-design studies. Our framework mitigates the risk of selective reporting while rigorously controlling type I error rates. At the same time, it maintains statistical power and reduces the likelihood of overlooking true positive effects. Importantly, our method is flexible and broadly applicable across various scientific domains and outcome results.

stat.ME↗

Multivariate Adjustments for Average Equivalence Testing

Multivariate (average) equivalence testing is widely used to assess whether the means of two conditions of interest are `equivalent' for different outcomes simultaneously. The multivariate Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure is typically used in this context by checking if, outcome by outcome, the marginal $100(1-2α$)\% confidence intervals for the difference in means between the two conditions of interest lie within pre-defined lower and upper equivalence limits. This procedure, known to be conservative in the univariate case, leads to a rapid power loss when the number of outcomes increases, especially when one or more outcome variances are relatively large. In this work, we propose a finite-sample adjustment for this procedure, the multivariate $α$-TOST, that consists in a correction of $α$, the significance level, taking the (arbitrary) dependence between the outcomes of interest into account and making it uniformly more powerful than the conventional multivariate TOST. We present an iterative algorithm allowing to efficiently define $α^{\star}$, the corrected significance level, a task that proves challenging in the multivariate setting due to the inter-relationship between $α^{\star}$ and the sets of values belonging to the null hypothesis space and defining the test size. We study the operating characteristics of the multivariate $α$-TOST both theoretically and via an extensive simulation study considering cases relevant for real-world analyses -- i.e.,~relatively small sample sizes, unknown and heterogeneous variances, and different correlation structures -- and show the superior finite-sample properties of the multivariate $α$-TOST compared to its conventional counterpart. We finally re-visit a case study on ticlopidine hydrochloride and compare both methods when simultaneously assessing bioequivalence for multiple pharmacokinetic parameters.

stat.ME↗

Accurate Inference for Penalized Logistic Regression

Inference for high-dimensional logistic regression models using penalized methods has been a challenging research problem. As an illustration, a major difficulty is the significant bias of the Lasso estimator, which limits its direct application in inference. Although various bias corrected Lasso estimators have been proposed, they often still exhibit substantial biases in finite samples, undermining their inference performance. These finite sample biases become particularly problematic in one-sided inference problems, such as one-sided hypothesis testing. This paper proposes a novel two-step procedure for accurate inference in high-dimensional logistic regression models. In the first step, we propose a Lasso-based variable selection method to select a suitable submodel of moderate size for subsequent inference. In the second step, we introduce a bias corrected estimator to fit the selected submodel. We demonstrate that the resulting estimator from this two-step procedure has a small bias order and enables accurate inference. Numerical studies and an analysis of alcohol consumption data are included, where our proposed method is compared to alternative approaches. Our results indicate that the proposed method exhibits significantly smaller biases than alternative methods in finite samples, thereby leading to improved inference performance.

stat.ME↗

An accurate percentile method for parametric inference based on asymptotically biased estimators

Inference methods for computing confidence intervals in parametric settings usually rely on consistent estimators of the parameter of interest. However, it may be computationally and/or analytically burdensome to obtain such estimators in various parametric settings, for example when the data exhibit certain features such as censoring, misclassification errors or outliers. To address these challenges, we propose a simulation-based inferential method, called the implicit bootstrap, that remains valid regardless of the potential asymptotic bias of the estimator on which the method is based. We demonstrate that this method allows for the construction of asymptotically valid percentile confidence intervals of the parameter of interest. Additionally, we show that these confidence intervals can also achieve second-order accuracy. We also show that the method is exact in three instances where the standard bootstrap fails. Using simulation studies, we illustrate the coverage accuracy of the method in three examples where standard parametric bootstrap procedures are computationally intensive and less accurate in finite samples.

stat.ME↗

Inference for Large Scale Regression Models with Dependent Errors

The exponential growth in data sizes and storage costs has brought considerable challenges to the data science community, requiring solutions to run learning methods on such data. While machine learning has scaled to achieve predictive accuracy in big data settings, statistical inference and uncertainty quantification tools are still lagging. Priority scientific fields collect vast data to understand phenomena typically studied with statistical methods like regression. In this setting, regression parameter estimation can benefit from efficient computational procedures, but the main challenge lies in computing error process parameters with complex covariance structures. Identifying and estimating these structures is essential for inference and often used for uncertainty quantification in machine learning with Gaussian Processes. However, estimating these structures becomes burdensome as data scales, requiring approximations that compromise the reliability of outputs. These approximations are even more unreliable when complexities like long-range dependencies or missing data are present. This work defines and proves the statistical properties of the Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments with Exogenous variables (GMWMX), a highly scalable, stable, and statistically valid method for estimating and delivering inference for linear models using stochastic processes in the presence of data complexities like latent dependence structures and missing data. Applied examples from Earth Sciences and extensive simulations highlight the advantages of the GMWMX.

stat.ME↗

Just Identified Indirect Inference Estimator: Accurate Inference through Bias Correction

An important challenge in statistical analysis lies in controlling the estimation bias when handling the ever-increasing data size and model complexity of modern data settings. In this paper, we propose a reliable estimation and inference approach for parametric models based on the Just Identified iNdirect Inference estimator (JINI). The key advantage of our approach is that it allows to construct a consistent estimator in a simple manner, while providing strong bias correction guarantees that lead to accurate inference. Our approach is particularly useful for complex parametric models, as it allows to bypass the analytical and computational difficulties (e.g., due to intractable estimating equation) typically encountered in standard procedures. The properties of JINI (including consistency, asymptotic normality, and its bias correction property) are also studied when the parameter dimension is allowed to diverge, which provide the theoretical foundation to explain the advantageous performance of JINI in increasing dimensional covariates settings. Our simulations and an alcohol consumption data analysis highlight the practical usefulness and excellent performance of JINI when data present features (e.g., misclassification, rounding) as well as in robust estimation.

stat.ME↗

Accounting for Vibration Noise in Stochastic Measurement Errors

The measurement of data over time and/or space is of utmost importance in a wide range of domains from engineering to physics. Devices that perform these measurements therefore need to be extremely precise to obtain correct system diagnostics and accurate predictions, consequently requiring a rigorous calibration procedure which models their errors before being employed. While the deterministic components of these errors do not represent a major modelling challenge, most of the research over the past years has focused on delivering methods that can explain and estimate the complex stochastic components of these errors. This effort has allowed to greatly improve the precision and uncertainty quantification of measurement devices but has this far not accounted for a significant stochastic noise that arises for many of these devices: vibration noise. Indeed, having filtered out physical explanations for this noise, a residual stochastic component often carries over which can drastically affect measurement precision. This component can originate from different sources, including the internal mechanics of the measurement devices as well as the movement of these devices when placed on moving objects or vehicles. To remove this disturbance from signals, this work puts forward a modelling framework for this specific type of noise and adapts the Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments to estimate these models. We deliver the asymptotic properties of this method when applied to processes that include vibration noise and show the considerable practical advantages of this approach in simulation and applied case studies.

stat.ME↗

A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia

We develop a penalized two-pass regression with time-varying factor loadings. The penalization in the first pass enforces sparsity for the time-variation drivers while also maintaining compatibility with the no-arbitrage restrictions by regularizing appropriate groups of coefficients. The second pass delivers risk premia estimates to predict equity excess returns. Our Monte Carlo results and our empirical results on a large cross-sectional data set of US individual stocks show that penalization without grouping can yield to nearly all estimated time-varying models violating the no-arbitrage restrictions. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the proposed method reduces the prediction errors compared to a penalized approach without appropriate grouping or a time-invariant factor model.

econ.EM↗

The Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments with Exogenous Inputs: a Fast Approach for the Analysis of GNSS Position Time Series

The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) daily position time series are often described as the sum of stochastic processes and geophysical signals which allow studying global and local geodynamical effects such as plate tectonics, earthquakes, or ground water variations. In this work we propose to extend the Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments (GMWM) to estimate the parameters of linear models with correlated residuals. This statistical inferential framework is applied to GNSS daily position time series data to jointly estimate functional (geophysical) as well as stochastic noise models. Our method is called GMWMX, with X standing for eXogeneous variable: it is semi-parametric, computationally efficient and scalable. Unlike standard methods such as the widely used Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), our methodology offers statistical guarantees, such as consistency and asymptotic normality, without relying on strong parametric assumptions. At the Gaussian model, our results show that the estimated parameters are similar to the ones obtained with the MLE. The computational performances of our approach has important practical implications. Indeed, the estimation of the parameters of large networks of thousands of GNSS stations quickly becomes computationally prohibitive. Compared to standard methods, the processing time of the GMWMX is over $1000$ times faster and allows the estimation of large scale problems within minutes on a standard computer. We validate the performances of our method via Monte-Carlo simulations by generating GNSS daily position time series with missing observations and we consider composite stochastic noise models including processes presenting long-range dependence such as power-law or Matérn processes. The advantages of our method are also illustrated using real time series from GNSS stations located in the Eastern part of the USA.

stat.ME↗

SWAG: A Wrapper Method for Sparse Learning

The majority of machine learning methods and algorithms give high priority to prediction performance which may not always correspond to the priority of the users. In many cases, practitioners and researchers in different fields, going from engineering to genetics, require interpretability and replicability of the results especially in settings where, for example, not all attributes may be available to them. As a consequence, there is the need to make the outputs of machine learning algorithms more interpretable and to deliver a library of "equivalent" learners (in terms of prediction performance) that users can select based on attribute availability in order to test and/or make use of these learners for predictive/diagnostic purposes. To address these needs, we propose to study a procedure that combines screening and wrapper approaches which, based on a user-specified learning method, greedily explores the attribute space to find a library of sparse learners with consequent low data collection and storage costs. This new method (i) delivers a low-dimensional network of attributes that can be easily interpreted and (ii) increases the potential replicability of results based on the diversity of attribute combinations defining strong learners with equivalent predictive power. We call this algorithm "Sparse Wrapper AlGorithm" (SWAG).

stat.ML↗

Multi-Signal Approaches for Repeated Sampling Schemes in Inertial Sensor Calibration

Inertial sensor calibration plays a progressively important role in many areas of research among which navigation engineering. By performing this task accurately, it is possible to significantly increase general navigation performance by correctly filtering out the deterministic and stochastic measurement errors that characterize such devices. While different techniques are available to model and remove the deterministic errors, there has been considerable research over the past years with respect to modelling the stochastic errors which have complex structures. In order to do the latter, different replicates of these error signals are collected and a model is identified and estimated based on one of these replicates. While this procedure has allowed to improve navigation performance, it has not yet taken advantage of the information coming from all the other replicates collected on the same sensor. However, it has been observed that there is often a change of error behaviour between replicates which can also be explained by different (constant) external conditions under which each replicate was taken. Whatever the reason for the difference between replicates, it appears that the model structure remains the same between replicates but the parameter values vary. In this work we therefore consider and study the properties of different approaches that allow to combine the information from all replicates considering this phenomenon, confirming their validity both in simulation settings and also when applied to real inertial sensor error signals. By taking into account parameter variation between replicates, this work highlights how these approaches can improve the average navigation precision as well as obtain reliable estimates of the uncertainty of the navigation solution.

eess.SP↗

Scale-wise Variance Minimization for Optimal Virtual Signals: An Approach for Redundant Gyroscopes

The increased use of low-cost gyroscopes within inertial sensors for navigation purposes, among others, has brought to the development of a considerable amount of research in improving their measurement precision. Aside from developing methods that allow to model and account for the deterministic and stochastic components that contribute to the measurement errors of these devices, an approach that has been put forward in recent years is to make use of arrays of such sensors in order to combine their measurements thereby reducing the impact of individual sensor noise. Nevertheless combining these measurements is not straightforward given the complex stochastic nature of these errors and, although some solutions have been suggested, these are limited to certain specific settings which do not allow to achieve solutions in more general and common circumstances. Hence, in this work we put forward a non-parametric method that makes use of the wavelet cross-covariance at different scales to combine the measurements coming from an array of gyroscopes in order to deliver an optimal measurement signal without needing any assumption on the processes underlying the individual error signals. We also study an appropriate non-parametric approach for the estimation of the asymptotic covariance matrix of the wavelet cross-covariance estimator which has important applications beyond the scope of this work. The theoretical properties of the proposed approach are studied and are supported by simulations and real applications, indicating that this method represents an appropriate and general tool for the construction of optimal virtual signals that are particularly relevant for arrays of gyroscopes. Moreover, our results can support the creation of optimal signals for other types of inertial sensors other than gyroscopes as well as for redundant measurements in other domains other than navigation.

stat.AP↗