arXiv subjects

Stavros Tripakis

Publications and source records attributed to Stavros Tripakis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Recursive Program Synthesis from Sketches and Mixed-Quantifier Properties

We present a novel approach for the synthesis of recursive programs from mixed-quantifier first-order logic properties. We solve this problem using a sketching-based, enumerative, counterexample-guided approach. Our algorithm learns syntactic constraints from counterexamples to prune the candidate space and employs a prophylactic pruning technique to avoid enumerating invalid candidates altogether. We implement our technique in a tool called Cataclyst and evaluate it on a suite of 60 benchmarks. We demonstrate that both counterexample generalization and prophylactic pruning significantly improve performance. Cataclyst solves 59/60 benchmarks, while variants of Cataclyst without counterexample generalization or prophylactic pruning solve fewer benchmarks. The only other tool that can handle mixed-quantifier specifications does not support sketching, so a direct comparison is not possible. This prior tool solves 12/60 benchmarks.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Interactive Safety Verification of Distributed Protocols by Inductive Proof Decomposition

Many techniques for the automated verification of distributed protocols have been developed over the past several years, but their performance is still unpredictable and their failure modes can be opaque for industrial scale verification tasks. Thus, in practice, large-scale verification efforts typically require some amount of human guidance. In this paper, we present inductive proof decomposition, a new methodology for interactive safety verification that provides a compositional, interactive approach to inductive invariant development. Our approach guides the human-aided development of inductive invariants via a novel structure, an inductive proof graph, which is built incrementally by a human verifier, working backwards from a target safety property. A user is guided by induction counterexamples that are localized to specific nodes of this graph, and nodes of this proof graph are further decomposed based on logical actions that appear in a protocol's transition relation. Our decomposition also enables a localized variable slicing technique that hides irrelevant protocol state at each sub-component of an inductive proof, allowing a user to focus on fine-grained sub-problems rather than a large, monolithic inductive invariant. We present our technique and experience applying it to develop inductive safety proofs of several complex distributed protocols, including the Raft consensus protocol, which is beyond the capabilities of modern automated verification tools. We also demonstrate how the developed proof graphs provide additional insight into the structure of a protocol proof and its correctness.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Can LLMs Perform Synthesis?

How do LLMs compare with symbolic tools on program synthesis tasks? We investigate this question on several synthesis domains: LTL reactive synthesis, syntax-guided synthesis, distributed protocol synthesis, and recursive function synthesis. For each domain, we choose a state-of-the-art symbolic tool and compare it to an open-source, 32 billion parameter version of the Qwen LLM and the proprietary, frontier LLM GPT-5. We couple Qwen with a symbolic verifier and run it repeatedly until it either produces a solution that passes the verifier, or until there is a timeout, for each benchmark. We run GPT-5 once per benchmark and verify the generated output. In all domains, the symbolic tools solve more benchmarks than Qwen and either outperform or are about on par with GPT-5. In terms of execution time, the symbolic tools outperform GPT-5 in all domains, and either outperform or are very close to Qwen, despite the fact that the LLMs are run on significantly more powerful hardware.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

LTLGuard: Formalizing LTL Specifications with Compact Language Models and Lightweight Symbolic Reasoning

Translating informal requirements into formal specifications is challenging due to the ambiguity and variability of natural language (NL). This challenge is particularly pronounced when relying on compact (small and medium) language models, which may lack robust knowledge of temporal logic and thus struggle to produce syntactically valid and consistent formal specifications. In this work, we focus on enabling resource-efficient open-weight models (4B--14B parameters) to generate correct linear temporal logic (LTL) specifications from informal requirements. We present LTLGuard, a modular toolchain that combines constrained generation with formal consistency checking to generate conflict-free LTL specifications from informal input. Our method integrates the generative capabilities of model languages with lightweight automated reasoning tools to iteratively refine candidate specifications, understand the origin of the conflicts and thus help in eliminating inconsistencies. We demonstrate the usability and the effectiveness of our approach and perform quantitative evaluation of the resulting framework.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Towards Language Model Guided TLA+ Proof Automation

Formal theorem proving with TLA+ provides rigorous guarantees for system specifications, but constructing proofs requires substantial expertise and effort. While large language models have shown promise in automating proofs for tactic-based theorem provers like Lean, applying these approaches directly to TLA+ faces significant challenges due to the hierarchical proof structure of the TLA+ proof system. We present a prompt-based approach that leverages LLMs to guide hierarchical decomposition of complex proof obligations into simpler sub-claims, while relying on symbolic provers for verification. Our key insight is to constrain LLMs to generate normalized claim decompositions rather than complete proofs, significantly reducing syntax errors. We also introduce a benchmark suite of 119 theorems adapted from (1) established mathematical collections and (2) inductive proofs of distributed protocols. Our approach consistently outperforms baseline methods across the benchmark suite.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Accelerating Protocol Synthesis and Detecting Unrealizability with Interpretation Reduction

We present a novel counterexample-guided, sketch-based method for the synthesis of symbolic distributed protocols in TLA+. Our method's chief novelty lies in a new search space reduction technique called interpretation reduction, which allows to not only eliminate incorrect candidate protocols before they are sent to the verifier, but also to avoid enumerating redundant candidates in the first place. Further performance improvements are achieved by an advanced technique for exact generalization of counterexamples. Experiments on a set of established benchmarks show that our tool is almost always faster than the state of the art, often by orders of magnitude, and was also able to synthesize an entire TLA+ protocol "from scratch" in less than 3 minutes where the state of the art timed out after an hour. Our method is sound, complete, and guaranteed to terminate on unrealizable synthesis instances under common assumptions which hold in all our benchmarks.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Efficient Synthesis of Symbolic Distributed Protocols by Sketching

We present a novel and efficient method for synthesis of parameterized distributed protocols by sketching. Our method is both syntax-guided and counterexample-guided, and utilizes a fast equivalence reduction technique that enables efficient completion of protocol sketches, often significantly reducing the search space of candidate completions by several orders of magnitude. To our knowledge, our tool, Scythe, is the first synthesis tool for the widely used specification language TLA+. We evaluate Scythe on a diverse benchmark of distributed protocols, demonstrating the ability to synthesize a large scale distributed Raft-based dynamic reconfiguration protocol beyond the scale of what existing synthesis techniques can handle.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Compositional Inductive Invariant Based Verification of Neural Network Controlled Systems

The integration of neural networks into safety-critical systems has shown great potential in recent years. However, the challenge of effectively verifying the safety of Neural Network Controlled Systems (NNCS) persists. This paper introduces a novel approach to NNCS safety verification, leveraging the inductive invariant method. Verifying the inductiveness of a candidate inductive invariant in the context of NNCS is hard because of the scale and nonlinearity of neural networks. Our compositional method makes this verification process manageable by decomposing the inductiveness proof obligation into smaller, more tractable subproblems. Alongside the high-level method, we present an algorithm capable of automatically verifying the inductiveness of given candidates by automatically inferring the necessary decomposition predicates. The algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline method and shows remarkable reductions in execution time in our case studies, shortening the verification time from hours (or timeout) to seconds.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Decoupled Fitness Criteria for Reactive Systems

The correctness problem for reactive systems has been thoroughly explored and is well understood. Meanwhile, the efficiency problem for reactive systems has not received the same attention. Indeed, one correct system may be less fit than another correct system and determining this manually is challenging and often done ad hoc. We (1) propose a novel and general framework which automatically assigns comparable fitness scores to reactive systems using interpretable parameters that are decoupled from the system being evaluated, (2) state the computational problem of evaluating this fitness score and reduce this problem to a matrix analysis problem, (3) discuss symbolic and numerical methods for solving this matrix analysis problem, and (4) illustrate our approach by evaluating the fitness of nine systems across three case studies, including the Alternating Bit Protocol and Two Phase Commit.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Synthesis of Distributed Protocols by Enumeration Modulo Isomorphisms

Synthesis of distributed protocols is a hard, often undecidable, problem. Completion techniques provide partial remedy by turning the problem into a search problem. However, the space of candidate completions is still massive. In this paper, we propose optimization techniques to reduce the size of the search space by a factorial factor by exploiting symmetries (isomorphisms) in functionally equivalent solutions. We present both a theoretical analysis of this optimization as well as empirical results that demonstrate its effectiveness in synthesizing both the Alternating Bit Protocol and Two Phase Commit. Our experiments show that the optimized tool achieves a speedup of approximately 2 to 10 times compared to its unoptimized counterpart.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Safe Environmental Envelopes of Discrete Systems

A safety verification task involves verifying a system against a desired safety property under certain assumptions about the environment. However, these environmental assumptions may occasionally be violated due to modeling errors or faults. Ideally, the system guarantees its critical properties even under some of these violations, i.e., the system is \emph{robust} against environmental deviations. This paper proposes a notion of \emph{robustness} as an explicit, first-class property of a transition system that captures how robust it is against possible \emph{deviations} in the environment. We modeled deviations as a set of \emph{transitions} that may be added to the original environment. Our robustness notion then describes the safety envelope of this system, i.e., it captures all sets of extra environment transitions for which the system still guarantees a desired property. We show that being able to explicitly reason about robustness enables new types of system analysis and design tasks beyond the common verification problem stated above. We demonstrate the application of our framework on case studies involving a radiation therapy interface, an electronic voting machine, a fare collection protocol, and a medical pump device.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2022

Plain and Simple Inductive Invariant Inference for Distributed Protocols in TLA+

We present a new technique for automatically inferring inductive invariants of parameterized distributed protocols specified in TLA+. Ours is the first such invariant inference technique to work directly on TLA+, an expressive, high level specification language. To achieve this, we present a new algorithm for invariant inference that is based around a core procedure for generating plain, potentially non-inductive lemma invariants that are used as candidate conjuncts of an overall inductive invariant. We couple this with a greedy lemma invariant selection procedure that selects lemmas that eliminate the largest number of counterexamples to induction at each round of our inference procedure. We have implemented our algorithm in a tool, endive, and evaluate it on a diverse set of distributed protocol benchmarks, demonstrating competitive performance and ability to uniquely solve an industrial scale reconfiguration protocol.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

Adversarial Robustness Verification and Attack Synthesis in Stochastic Systems

Probabilistic model checking is a useful technique for specifying and verifying properties of stochastic systems including randomized protocols and reinforcement learning models. Existing methods rely on the assumed structure and probabilities of certain system transitions. These assumptions may be incorrect, and may even be violated by an adversary who gains control of system components. In this paper, we develop a formal framework for adversarial robustness in systems modeled as discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs). We base our framework on existing methods for verifying probabilistic temporal logic properties and extend it to include deterministic, memoryless policies acting in Markov decision processes (MDPs). Our framework includes a flexible approach for specifying structure-preserving and non structure-preserving adversarial models. We outline a class of threat models under which adversaries can perturb system transitions, constrained by an $\varepsilon$ ball around the original transition probabilities. We define three main DTMC adversarial robustness problems: adversarial robustness verification, maximal $δ$ synthesis, and worst case attack synthesis. We present two optimization-based solutions to these three problems, leveraging traditional and parametric probabilistic model checking techniques. We then evaluate our solutions on two stochastic protocols and a collection of Grid World case studies, which model an agent acting in an environment described as an MDP. We find that the parametric solution results in fast computation for small parameter spaces. In the case of less restrictive (stronger) adversaries, the number of parameters increases, and directly computing property satisfaction probabilities is more scalable. We demonstrate the usefulness of our definitions and solutions by comparing system outcomes over various properties, threat models, and case studies.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2022

Automated Attacker Synthesis for Distributed Protocols

Distributed protocols should be robust to both benign malfunction (e.g. packet loss or delay) and attacks (e.g. message replay) from internal or external adversaries. In this paper we take a formal approach to the automated synthesis of attackers, i.e. adversarial processes that can cause the protocol to malfunction. Specifically, given a formal threat model capturing the distributed protocol model and network topology, as well as the placement, goals, and interface (inputs and outputs) of potential attackers, we automatically synthesize an attacker. We formalize four attacker synthesis problems - across attackers that always succeed versus those that sometimes fail, and attackers that attack forever versus those that do not - and we propose algorithmic solutions to two of them. We report on a prototype implementation called KORG and its application to TCP as a case-study. Our experiments show that KORG can automatically generate well-known attacks for TCP within seconds or minutes.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2022

On Neural Network Equivalence Checking using SMT Solvers

Two pretrained neural networks are deemed equivalent if they yield similar outputs for the same inputs. Equivalence checking of neural networks is of great importance, due to its utility in replacing learning-enabled components with equivalent ones, when there is need to fulfill additional requirements or to address security threats, as is the case for example when using knowledge distillation, adversarial training etc. SMT solvers can potentially provide solutions to the problem of neural network equivalence checking that will be sound and complete, but as it is expected any such solution is associated with significant limitations with respect to the size of neural networks to be checked. This work presents a first SMT-based encoding of the equivalence checking problem, explores its utility and limitations and proposes avenues for future research and improvements towards more scalable and practically applicable solutions. We present experimental results that shed light to the aforementioned issues, for diverse types of neural network models (classifiers and regression networks) and equivalence criteria, towards a general and application-independent equivalence checking approach.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Formal Verification of a Distributed Dynamic Reconfiguration Protocol

We present a formal, machine checked TLA+ safety proof of MongoRaftReconfig, a distributed dynamic reconfiguration protocol. MongoRaftReconfig was designed for and implemented in MongoDB, a distributed database whose replication protocol is derived from the Raft consensus algorithm. We present an inductive invariant for MongoRaftReconfig that is formalized in TLA+ and formally proved using the TLA+ proof system (TLAPS). We also present a formal TLAPS proof of two key safety properties of MongoRaftReconfig, LeaderCompleteness and StateMachineSafety. To our knowledge, these are the first machine checked inductive invariant and safety proof of a dynamic reconfiguration protocol for a Raft based replication system.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Design and Analysis of a Logless Dynamic Reconfiguration Protocol

Distributed replication systems based on the replicated state machine model have become ubiquitous as the foundation of modern database systems. To ensure availability in the presence of faults, these systems must be able to dynamically replace failed nodes with healthy ones via dynamic reconfiguration. MongoDB is a document oriented database with a distributed replication mechanism derived from the Raft protocol. In this paper, we present MongoRaftReconfig, a novel dynamic reconfiguration protocol for the MongoDB replication system. MongoRaftReconfig utilizes a logless approach to managing configuration state and decouples the processing of configuration changes from the main database operation log. The protocol's design was influenced by engineering constraints faced when attempting to redesign an unsafe, legacy reconfiguration mechanism that existed previously in MongoDB. We provide a safety proof of MongoRaftReconfig, along with a formal specification in TLA+. To our knowledge, this is the first published safety proof and formal specification of a reconfiguration protocol for a Raft-based system. We also present results from model checking its safety properties on finite protocol instances. Finally, we discuss the conceptual novelties of MongoRaftReconfig, how it can be understood as an optimized and generalized version of the single server reconfiguration algorithm of Raft, and present an experimental evaluation of how its optimizations can provide performance benefits for reconfigurations.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

On tolerance of discrete systems with respect to transition perturbations

Control systems should enforce a desired property for both expected modeled situations as well as unexpected unmodeled environmental situations. Existing methods focus on designing controllers to enforce the desired property only when the environment behaves as expected. However, these methods lack discussion on how the system behaves when the environment is perturbed. In this paper, we propose an approach for analyzing control systems with respect to their tolerance against environmental perturbations. A control system tolerates certain environmental perturbations when it remains capable of guaranteeing the desired property despite the perturbations. Each controller inherently has a level of tolerance against environmental perturbations. We formally define this notion of tolerance and describe a general technique to compute it, for any given regular property. We also present a more efficient method to compute tolerance with respect to invariance properties. Moreover, we introduce a new controller synthesis problem based on our notion of tolerance. We demonstrate the application of our framework on an autonomous surveillance example.

eess.SY↗