Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Stefan Riedelbauch

Publications and source records attributed to Stefan Riedelbauch.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Data Publishing in Mechanics and Dynamics: Challenges, Guidelines, and Examples from Engineering Design

Data-based methods have gained increasing importance in engineering, especially but not only driven by successes with deep artificial neural networks. Success stories are prevalent, e.g., in areas such as data-driven modeling, control and automation, as well as surrogate modeling for accelerated simulation. Beyond engineering, generative and large-language models are increasingly helping with tasks that, previously, were solely associated with creative human processes. Thus, it seems timely to seek artificial-intelligence-support for engineering design tasks to automate, help with, or accelerate purpose-built designs of engineering systems, e.g., in mechanics and dynamics, where design so far requires a lot of specialized knowledge. However, research-wise, compared to established, predominantly first-principles-based methods, the datasets used for training, validation, and test become an almost inherent part of the overall methodology. Thus, data publishing becomes just as important in (data-driven) engineering science as appropriate descriptions of conventional methodology in publications in the past. This article analyzes the value and challenges of data publishing in mechanics and dynamics, in particular regarding engineering design tasks, showing that the latter raise also challenges and considerations not typical in fields where data-driven methods have been booming originally. Possible ways to deal with these challenges are discussed and a set of examples from across different design problems shows how data publishing can be put into practice. The analysis, discussions, and examples are based on the research experience made in a priority program of the German research foundation focusing on research on artificially intelligent design assistants in mechanics and dynamics.

cs.CY↗

Direct Prediction of Steady-State Flow Fields in Meshed Domain with Graph Networks

We propose a model to directly predict the steady-state flow field for a given geometry setup. The setup is an Eulerian representation of the fluid flow as a meshed domain. We introduce a graph network architecture to process the mesh-space simulation as a graph. The benefit of our model is a strong understanding of the global physical system, while being able to explore the local structure. This is essential to perform direct prediction and is thus superior to other existing methods.

physics.flu-dyn↗

Transferable Model for Shape Optimization subject to Physical Constraints

The interaction of neural networks with physical equations offers a wide range of applications. We provide a method which enables a neural network to transform objects subject to given physical constraints. Therefore an U-Net architecture is used to learn the underlying physical behaviour of fluid flows. The network is used to infer the solution of flow simulations, which will be shown for a wide range of generic channel flow simulations. Physical meaningful quantities can be computed on the obtained solution, e.g. the total pressure difference or the forces on the objects. A Spatial Transformer Network with thin-plate-splines is used for the interaction between the physical constraints and the geometric representation of the objects. Thus, a transformation from an initial to a target geometry is performed such that the object is fulfilling the given constraints. This method is fully differentiable i.e., gradient informations can be used for the transformation. This can be seen as an inverse design process. The advantage of this method over many other proposed methods is, that the physical constraints are based on the inferred flow field solution. Thus, we have a transferable model which can be applied to varying problem setups and is not limited to a given set of geometry parameters or physical quantities.

cs.AI↗