arXiv subjects

Stephanie Maaz

Publications and source records attributed to Stephanie Maaz.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

FO Value Discovery and Partial Vertex Cover Discovery

We study solution discovery in the token-sliding model from a logical and cost-value optimization perspective. In solution discovery, we are given a graph, an initial placement of $k$ tokens, and a movement budget $b$. The task is to find a reachable target configuration satisfying a prescribed condition. Our results are inspired by \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery}, where the condition is that the~$k$ tokens cover at least $t$ edges of the input graph. This objective is not merely a sum of independent occupied vertex contributions: each selected vertex contributes its degree, but edges with both endpoints selected have to be subtracted once. To capture this phenomenon, we introduce \textsc{FO Value Discovery}, an optimization problem in which the value of a selected tuple is given by unary vertex weights together with first-order definable correction terms. We further generalize the setting to \textsc{FO Cost-Value Decision}, where vertices carry both costs and values, and the task is to decide whether there is a tuple whose first-order value expression reaches a prescribed value threshold while respecting a cost bound. Finally, we study the parameterized complexity of \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} and \textsc{Vertex Cover Discovery}. As a consequence of the logical meta-theorems, we obtain fixed-parameter tractability of \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} on several graph classes, including classes of locally bounded cliquewidth. We also show that \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k+b$ and fixed-parameter tractable on $d$-degenerate graphs parameterized by $k+d$. For \textsc{Vertex Cover Discovery}, we prove NP-hardness on planar graphs, W[1]-hardness parameterized by the clique cover number, even when a clique cover is supplied with the input, and W[1]-hardness with respect to parameter cutwidth.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Separating Feasibility and Movement in Solution Discovery: The Case of Path Discovery

We study solution discovery, where the goal is to obtain a feasible solution to a problem from an initial configuration by a bounded sequence of local moves. In many applications, however, the graph that defines which vertex sets are feasible is not the same as the graph that governs how tokens, agents, or resources may move. Existing models such as token sliding and token jumping typically do not distinguish the problem graph and the movement graph. Motivated by this mismatch, we introduce a directed weighted two-graph model that cleanly separates feasibility from movement. A problem graph specifies the desired combinatorial objects, while a movement graph specifies admissible relocations and their costs. This yields a flexible framework that captures asymmetry, heterogeneous movement constraints, and weighted transitions, while subsuming classical discovery models as special cases. We investigate this model through \textsc{Path Discovery} and \textsc{Shortest Path Discovery}, where the task is to realize a vertex set containing an $s$-$t$-path or a shortest $s$-$t$-path in the problem graph. These problems are particularly natural in applications, since directed and weighted shortest paths are among the most fundamental algorithmic primitives. At the same time, previous work has already shown that discovery can be computationally hard even when the underlying optimization problem is easy. Our results show that this phenomenon persists, and becomes especially rich, in the two-graph setting. We obtain a detailed complexity picture, identifying tractable cases as well as strong hardness results.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2025

On Algorithmic Meta-Theorems for Solution Discovery: Tractability and Barriers

Solution discovery asks whether a given (infeasible) starting configuration to a problem can be transformed into a feasible solution using a limited number of transformation steps. This paper investigates meta-theorems for solution discovery for graph problems definable in monadic second-order logic (MSO$_1$ and MSO$_2$) and first-order logic (FO) where the transformation step is to slide a token to an adjacent vertex, focusing on parameterized complexity and structural graph parameters that do not involve the transformation budget $b$. We present both positive and negative results. On the algorithmic side, we prove that MSO$_2$-Discovery is in XP when parameterized by treewidth and that MSO$_1$-Discovery is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by neighborhood diversity. On the hardness side, we establish that FO-Discovery is W[1]-hard when parameterized by modulator to stars, modulator to paths, as well as twin cover, numbers. Additionally, we prove that MSO$_1$-Discovery is W[1]-hard when parameterized by bandwidth. These results complement the straightforward observation that solution discovery for the studied problems is fixed-parameter tractable when the budget $b$ is included in the parameter (in particular, parameterized by cliquewidth$+b$, where the cliquewidth of a graph is at most any of the studied parameters), and provide a near-complete (fixed-parameter tractability) meta-theorems investigation for solution discovery problems for MSO- and FO-definable graph problems and structural parameters larger than cliquewidth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Kernelization Complexity of Solution Discovery Problems

In the solution discovery variant of a vertex (edge) subset problem $\Pi$ on graphs, we are given an initial configuration of tokens on the vertices (edges) of an input graph $G$ together with a budget $b$. The question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution of $\Pi$ on $G$ with at most $b$ modification steps. We consider the token sliding variant of the solution discovery framework, where each modification step consists of sliding a token to an adjacent vertex (edge). The framework of solution discovery was recently introduced by Fellows et al. [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023] and for many solution discovery problems the classical as well as the parameterized complexity has been established. In this work, we study the kernelization complexity of the solution discovery variants of Vertex Cover, Independent Set, Dominating Set, Shortest Path, Matching, and Vertex Cut with respect to the parameters number of tokens $k$, discovery budget $b$, as well as structural parameters such as pathwidth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Solution discovery via reconfiguration for problems in P

In the recently introduced framework of solution discovery via reconfiguration [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023], we are given an initial configuration of $k$ tokens on a graph and the question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution (for some problem) via a bounded number $b$ of small modification steps. In this work, we study solution discovery variants of polynomial-time solvable problems, namely Spanning Tree Discovery, Shortest Path Discovery, Matching Discovery, and Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery in the unrestricted token addition/removal model, the token jumping model, and the token sliding model. In the unrestricted token addition/removal model, we show that all four discovery variants remain in P. For the toking jumping model we also prove containment in P, except for Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery, for which we prove NP-completeness. Finally, in the token sliding model, almost all considered problems become NP-complete, the exception being Spanning Tree Discovery, which remains polynomial-time solvable. We then study the parameterized complexity of the NP-complete problems and provide a full classification of tractability with respect to the parameters solution size (number of tokens) $k$ and transformation budget (number of steps) $b$. Along the way, we observe strong connections between the solution discovery variants of our base problems and their (weighted) rainbow variants as well as their red-blue variants with cardinality constraints.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2022

Efficient algorithms to solve atom reconfiguration problems. II. The assignment-rerouting-ordering (aro) algorithm

Programmable arrays of optical traps enable the assembly of configurations of single atoms to perform controlled experiments on quantum many-body systems. Finding the sequence of control operations to transform an arbitrary configuration of atoms into a predetermined one requires solving an atom reconfiguration problem quickly and efficiently. A typical approach to solve atom reconfiguration problems is to use an assignment algorithm to determine which atoms to move to which traps. This approach results in control protocols that exactly minimize the number of displacement operations; however, this approach does not optimize for the number of displaced atoms or the number of times each atom is displaced, resulting in unnecessary control operations that increase the execution time and failure rate of the control protocol. In this work, we propose the assignment-rerouting-ordering (aro) algorithm to improve the performance of assignment-based algorithms in solving atom reconfiguration problems. The aro algorithm uses an assignment subroutine to minimize the total distance traveled by all atoms, a rerouting subroutine to reduce the number of displaced atoms, and an ordering subroutine to guarantee that each atom is displaced at most once. The ordering subroutine relies on the existence of a partial ordering of moves that can be obtained using a polynomial-time algorithm that we introduce within the formal framework of graph theory. We numerically quantify the performance of the aro algorithm in the presence and in the absence of loss, and show that it outperforms the exact, approximation, and heuristic algorithms that we use as benchmarks. Our results are useful for assembling large configurations of atoms with high success probability and fast preparation time, as well as for designing and benchmarking novel atom reconfiguration algorithms.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Efficient algorithms to solve atom reconfiguration problems. I. The redistribution-reconfiguration (red-rec) algorithm

We propose the redistribution-reconfiguration (red-rec) algorithm to prepare large configurations of atoms using arrays of dynamic optical traps. Red-rec exploits simple heuristics and exact subroutines to solve atom reconfiguration problems on grids. It admits a fast and efficient implementation suitable for real-time operation. We numerically quantify its performance using realistic physical parameters and operational constraints, both in the absence and presence of loss. Red-rec enables assembling large configurations of atoms with high mean success probability. Fast preparation times are achieved by harnessing parallel control operations that actuate multiple traps simultaneously. Faster preparation times are achieved by rejecting configurations of atoms containing fewer atoms than a given threshold. However, the number of traps required to prepare a compact-centered configuration of atoms on a grid with a probability of 0.5 scales as the 3/2 power of the number of desired atoms. This finding highlights some of the challenges associated with scaling up configurations of atoms beyond tens of thousands of atoms.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Parameterized complexity of reconfiguration of atoms

Our work is motivated by the challenges presented in preparing arrays of atoms for use in quantum simulation. The recently-developed process of loading atoms into traps results in approximately half of the traps being filled. To consolidate the atoms so that they form a dense and regular arrangement, such as all locations in a grid, atoms are rearranged using moving optical tweezers. Time is of the essence, as the longer that the process takes and the more that atoms are moved, the higher the chance that atoms will be lost in the process. Viewed as a problem on graphs, we wish to solve the problem of reconfiguring one arrangement of tokens (representing atoms) to another using as few moves as possible. Because the problem is NP-complete on general graphs as well as on grids, we focus on the parameterized complexity for various parameters, considering both undirected and directed graphs, and tokens with and without labels. For unlabelled tokens, the problem is in FPT when parameterizing by the number of tokens, the number of moves, or the number of moves plus the number of vertices without tokens in either the source or target configuration, but intractable when parameterizing by the difference between the number of moves and the number of differences in the placement of tokens in the source and target configurations. When labels are added to tokens, however, most of the tractability results are replaced by hardness results.

cs.CC↗