You're Gonna Need a Bigger Core: Calibrating Massive Star Models against Galactic OB-type Stars
The evolution of massive stars above 8 M$_\odot$ depends critically on the amount of mixing above the convective core during the main sequence. However, current models typically extrapolate results from lower-mass stars, where constraints from asteroseismology and eclipsing binary systems are more readily available. A new opportunity to study the evolution of massive stars and their distribution in the Hertzsprung--Russell diagram arises by combining the IACOB spectroscopic sample of over 900 Galactic OB-type stars with Gaia distances. We use this homogeneously analyzed sample to place population-level constraints on main-sequence evolution. We analyze the data by forward modeling stellar evolution tracks with MESA and applying Bayesian inference. This enables us to 1) determine a physically-motivated, data-driven location of the terminal-age main sequence, 2) constrain convective boundary mixing and resulting core masses, and 3) provide a set of massive star models calibrated against modern data. We explore how boundary mixing depends on mass and find that it is well described by a constant overshooting parameter in the mass range of 12 to 40 M$_\odot$, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{ov}} = 0.33 \pm 0.02$, or $f_{\mathrm{ov}} = 0.028 \pm 0.003$ in the step and exponential overshooting schemes respectively. We find evidence against a continuation of the trend to increase with mass that is found at lower masses. Instead, the data does not exclude a decreasing trend at the high mass end. We find that the resulting helium core masses are 10 to 40% larger than other commonly used overshooting prescriptions. Combining our findings with existing observational constraints for low- and intermediate-mass stars, we propose a new mass-dependent overshooting prescription for a wide range of masses. Our calibration and model set are particularly useful for population and spectral synthesis applications.